COMPARISON BETWEEN HIGH-FIELD-STRENGTH MR IMAGING AND CT FOR SCREENING OF HEPATIC METASTASES - A RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC ANALYSIS

被引:80
|
作者
RUMMENY, EJ [1 ]
WERNECKE, K [1 ]
SAINI, S [1 ]
VASSALLO, P [1 ]
WIESMANN, W [1 ]
OESTMANN, JW [1 ]
KIVELITZ, D [1 ]
REERS, B [1 ]
REISER, MF [1 ]
PETERS, PE [1 ]
机构
[1] MASSACHUSETTS GEN HOSP,DEPT RADIOL,BOSTON,MA 02114
关键词
COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (CT); COMPARATIVE STUDIES; GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT; NEOPLASMS; LIVER NEOPLASMS; CT; MR; SECONDARY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE (MR);
D O I
10.1148/radiology.182.3.1535912
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The diagnostic performance of high-field-strength magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (1.5 T) for detection of liver metastases was compared with that of computed tomography (CT). All patients (n = 52) underwent preoperative screening for metastases by means of MR imaging with T1-weighted, proton-density-weighted, and T2-weighted pulse sequences and CT scanning with unenhanced, incremental dynamic bolus-enhanced, and delayed contrast medium-enhanced techniques. Diagnostic performance was evaluated by means of receiver operating characteristic analysis in which 800 images (400 with and 400 without lesions) and five readers (4,000 observations) were used; images were obtained from patients (n = 39) in whom the same anatomic levels were available for all MR imaging and CT studies. Direct comparison between the best MR imaging technique (T2-weighted spin-echo imaging [repetition time, 2,000 msec; echo time, 70 msec]) and the best CT technique (incremental dynamic bolus CT) showed a strong trend of superiority of T2-weighted MR imaging over incremental dynamic bolus CT. No highly statistically significant difference (P greater-than-or-equal-to .01), however, was found between these two techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:879 / 886
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Acute and subacute ischemic stroke at high-field-strength (3.0-T) diffusion-weighted MR imaging: Intraindividual comparative study
    Kuhl, CK
    Textor, J
    Gieseke, I
    von Falkenhausen, M
    Gernert, S
    Urbach, H
    Schild, HH
    RADIOLOGY, 2005, 234 (02) : 509 - 516
  • [42] Is T2-weighted MR imaging necessary for detection of malignant hepatic tumors?: Evaluation with alternative-free response receiver-operating-characteristic (AFROC) analysis
    Matuo, M
    Kanematsu, M
    Itoh, K
    Ito, K
    Maetani, Y
    Hoshi, H
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 634 - 634
  • [43] Detection and characterization of malignant hepatic tumors: Comparison of gadolinium- and ferumoxides-enhanced MR images by using receiver-operating-characteristic curve
    Matsuo, M
    Kanematsu, M
    Itoh, K
    Ito, K
    Maetani, Y
    Hoshi, H
    RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 : 279 - 279
  • [44] Comparison between CT and MR in perfusion imaging assessment of high-grade gliomas
    De Simone, M.
    Muccio, C. F.
    Pagnotta, S. M.
    Esposito, G.
    Cianfoni, A.
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2013, 118 (01): : 140 - 151
  • [45] Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and dual-phase helical CT in the preoperative assessment of suspected pancreatic cancer: A comparative study with receiver operating characteristic analysis
    Sheridan, MB
    Ward, J
    Guthrie, JA
    Spencer, JA
    Craven, CM
    Wilson, D
    Guillou, PJ
    Robinson, PJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 173 (03) : 583 - 590
  • [47] Receiver operating characteristic analysis in preoperative staging of uterine endometrial carcinoma with MR imaging: Diagnostic impact of high-resolution T2-weighted images
    Takahashi, S
    Murakami, T
    Tsuda, K
    Narumi, Y
    Kim, T
    Nakamura, H
    RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 : 594 - 594
  • [48] DIAGNOSIS OF ABDOMINAL VENOUS THROMBOSIS BY MEANS OF SPIN-ECHO AND GRADIENT-ECHO MR IMAGING - ANALYSIS WITH RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES
    ARRIVE, L
    MENU, Y
    DESSARTS, I
    DUBRAY, B
    VULLIERME, MP
    VILGRAIN, V
    NAJMARK, D
    NAHUM, H
    RADIOLOGY, 1991, 181 (03) : 661 - 668
  • [49] Whole-body high-field-strength (3.0-T) MR imaging in clinical practice -: Part II.: Technical considerations and clinical applications
    Kuhl, Christiane K.
    Traeber, Frank
    Gieseke, Juergen
    Drahanowsky, Wolfgang
    Morakkabati-Spitz, Nuschin
    Willinek, Winfried
    Von Falkenhausen, Marcus
    Manka, Christoph
    Schild, Hans H.
    RADIOLOGY, 2008, 247 (01) : 16 - 35
  • [50] COMPARISON OF 3 PSYCHIATRIC SCREENING-TESTS USING RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (ROC) ANALYSIS - NEW METHODS FOR USING STRATIFIED SAMPLES
    WEINSTEIN, MC
    BERWICK, DM
    GOLDMAN, P
    MURPHY, JM
    BARSKY, AJ
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1988, 8 (04) : 332 - 332