COMPARISON BETWEEN HIGH-FIELD-STRENGTH MR IMAGING AND CT FOR SCREENING OF HEPATIC METASTASES - A RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC ANALYSIS

被引:80
|
作者
RUMMENY, EJ [1 ]
WERNECKE, K [1 ]
SAINI, S [1 ]
VASSALLO, P [1 ]
WIESMANN, W [1 ]
OESTMANN, JW [1 ]
KIVELITZ, D [1 ]
REERS, B [1 ]
REISER, MF [1 ]
PETERS, PE [1 ]
机构
[1] MASSACHUSETTS GEN HOSP,DEPT RADIOL,BOSTON,MA 02114
关键词
COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (CT); COMPARATIVE STUDIES; GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT; NEOPLASMS; LIVER NEOPLASMS; CT; MR; SECONDARY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE (MR);
D O I
10.1148/radiology.182.3.1535912
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The diagnostic performance of high-field-strength magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (1.5 T) for detection of liver metastases was compared with that of computed tomography (CT). All patients (n = 52) underwent preoperative screening for metastases by means of MR imaging with T1-weighted, proton-density-weighted, and T2-weighted pulse sequences and CT scanning with unenhanced, incremental dynamic bolus-enhanced, and delayed contrast medium-enhanced techniques. Diagnostic performance was evaluated by means of receiver operating characteristic analysis in which 800 images (400 with and 400 without lesions) and five readers (4,000 observations) were used; images were obtained from patients (n = 39) in whom the same anatomic levels were available for all MR imaging and CT studies. Direct comparison between the best MR imaging technique (T2-weighted spin-echo imaging [repetition time, 2,000 msec; echo time, 70 msec]) and the best CT technique (incremental dynamic bolus CT) showed a strong trend of superiority of T2-weighted MR imaging over incremental dynamic bolus CT. No highly statistically significant difference (P greater-than-or-equal-to .01), however, was found between these two techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:879 / 886
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMPARISON OF CT, LOW-FIELD-STRENGTH MR IMAGING, AND HIGH-FIELD-STRENGTH MR IMAGING - WORK IN PROGRESS
    ORRISON, WW
    STIMAC, GK
    STEVENS, EA
    LAMASTERS, DL
    ESPINOSA, MC
    COBB, L
    METTLER, FA
    RADIOLOGY, 1991, 181 (01) : 121 - 127
  • [2] The promise of high-field-strength MR imaging
    Helpern, JA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2003, 24 (09) : 1738 - 1739
  • [3] HEATING OF THE SCROTUM BY HIGH-FIELD-STRENGTH MR IMAGING
    SHELLOCK, FG
    ROTHMAN, B
    SARTI, D
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1990, 154 (06) : 1229 - 1232
  • [4] INFECTIONS OF THE MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM - HIGH-FIELD-STRENGTH MR IMAGING
    BELTRAN, J
    NOTO, AM
    MCGHEE, RB
    FREEDY, RM
    MCCALLA, MS
    RADIOLOGY, 1987, 164 (02) : 449 - 454
  • [5] TENDONS - HIGH-FIELD-STRENGTH, SURFACE COIL MR IMAGING
    BELTRAN, J
    NOTO, AM
    HERMAN, LJ
    LUBBERS, LM
    RADIOLOGY, 1987, 162 (03) : 735 - 740
  • [6] INTRACEREBRAL MALIGNANT-MELANOMA - HIGH-FIELD-STRENGTH MR IMAGING
    WOODRUFF, WW
    DJANG, WT
    MCLENDON, RE
    HEINZ, ER
    VOORHEES, DR
    RADIOLOGY, 1987, 165 (01) : 209 - 213
  • [7] DEVELOPMENT OF THE HUMAN CEREBELLUM OBSERVED WITH HIGH-FIELD-STRENGTH MR IMAGING
    STRICKER, T
    MARTIN, E
    BOESCH, C
    RADIOLOGY, 1990, 177 (02) : 431 - 435
  • [8] THYROID IMAGING WITH HIGH-FIELD-STRENGTH SURFACE-COIL MR
    GEFTER, WB
    SPRITZER, CE
    EISENBERG, B
    LIVOLSI, VA
    AXEL, L
    VELCHIK, M
    ALAVI, A
    SCHENCK, J
    KRESSEL, HY
    RADIOLOGY, 1987, 164 (02) : 483 - 490
  • [9] Overcoming artifacts from metallic orthopedic implants at high-field-strength MR imaging and multidetector CT
    Lee, Mi-Jung
    Kim, Sungjun
    Lee, Sung-Ah
    Song, Ho-Taek
    Huh, Yong-Min
    Kim, Dae-Hong
    Han, Seung Hwan
    Suh, Jin-Suck
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2007, 27 (03) : 791 - 803
  • [10] Chronic Multiple Sclerosis Lesions: Characterization with High-Field-Strength MR Imaging
    Yao, Bing
    Bagnato, Francesca
    Matsuura, Eiji
    Merkle, Hellmut
    van Gelderen, Peter
    Cantor, Fredric K.
    Duyn, Jeff H.
    RADIOLOGY, 2012, 262 (01) : 206 - 215