A COMPARISON OF 4 FIELD METHODS FOR MEASURING SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

被引：0
|
作者：
DORSEY, JD
WARD, AD
FAUSEY, NR
BAIR, ES
机构：
[1] USDA ARS, SOIL DRAINAGE RES UNIT, WASHINGTON, DC 20250 USA
[2] OHIO STATE UNIV, DEPT GEOL & MINERAL, COLUMBUS, OH 43210 USA
来源：
TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE | 1990年 / 33卷 / 06期
关键词：
SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY MEASUREMENT; AUGER HOLE METHOD; GUELPH PERMEAMETER; PUMPING TEST METHOD; VELOCITY PERMEAMETER;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号：
0828 ;
摘要：
A comparison was made of the Guelph permeameter, the velocity permeameter, a pumping test procedure, and the auger hole method for measuring saturated hydraulic conductivity. The methods were compared on a Ravenna silt loam and a Hoytville silty clay loam. The evaluations were conducted during high water table conditions established by subirrigation. All the methods showed a wide variability in saturated hydraulic conductivity within each research plot. The pumping test, auger hole, and velocity permeameter methods provided results within similar ranges whereas the Guelph permeameter provided significantly lower estimates. Saturated hydraulic conductivity estimates for the Ravenna silt loam ranged from 0.03 to 35 mm/h with an average value of 3.4 mm/h. Estimates for the Hoytville silty clay loam ranged from 0.01 to 260 mm/h with an average value of 2.2 mm/h.
引用
收藏
页码：1925 / 1931
页数：7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] CENTRIFUGAL TECHNIQUES FOR MEASURING SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
    NIMMO, JR
    MELLO, KA
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1991, 27 (06) : 1263 - 1269
  • [12] Comparison of Methods to Estimate Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity in Texas Soils with Grass
    Duan, Runbin
    Fedler, Clifford B.
    Borrelli, John
    JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 2012, 138 (04) : 322 - 327
  • [13] Comparison of determination methods for saturated soil hydraulic conductivity with Guelph infiltrometer
    Wang, Honglan
    Song, Songbai
    Tang, Xiangyu
    Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2012, 28 (24): : 99 - 104
  • [14] Comparison of instream methods for measuring hydraulic conductivity in sandy streambeds
    Landon, MK
    Rus, DL
    Harvey, FE
    GROUND WATER, 2001, 39 (06) : 870 - 885
  • [15] Comparison of Field and Laboratory Methods for Measuring Hydraulic Conductivity in the Unsaturated Zone in Engineered and Native Soils
    Garza, Pablo R.
    Zukowski, Zachary
    Welker, Andrea
    LaBrake, Derron
    Nalbandia, Richard
    GEOTECHNICAL FRONTIERS 2017: GEOTECHNICAL MATERIALS, MODELING, AND TESTING, 2017, (280): : 709 - 718
  • [16] Determining wildfire ash saturated hydraulic conductivity and sorptivity with laboratory and field methods
    Balfour, Victoria N.
    CATENA, 2015, 135 : 358 - 368
  • [17] Analytical methods for estimating saturated hydraulic conductivity in a tile-drained field
    Rupp, DE
    Owens, JM
    Warren, KL
    Selker, JS
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2004, 289 (1-4) : 111 - 127
  • [18] Field evaluation of the new Philip-Dunne permeameter for measuring saturated hydraulic conductivity
    Muñoz-Carpena, R
    Regalado, CM
    Alvarez-Benedi, J
    Bartoli, F
    SOIL SCIENCE, 2002, 167 (01) : 9 - 24
  • [19] A Method for Measuring Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity in Anisotropic Soils
    Iwanek, Malgorzata
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2008, 72 (06) : 1527 - 1531
  • [20] COMPARISON OF SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY MEASUREMENT METHODS FOR A GLACIAL-TILL SOIL
    MOHANTY, BP
    KANWAR, RS
    EVERTS, CJ
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1994, 58 (03) : 672 - 677
12345