A COMPARISON OF 4 FIELD METHODS FOR MEASURING SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

被引：0
|
作者：
DORSEY, JD
WARD, AD
FAUSEY, NR
BAIR, ES
机构：
[1] USDA ARS, SOIL DRAINAGE RES UNIT, WASHINGTON, DC 20250 USA
[2] OHIO STATE UNIV, DEPT GEOL & MINERAL, COLUMBUS, OH 43210 USA
来源：
TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE | 1990年 / 33卷 / 06期
关键词：
SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY MEASUREMENT; AUGER HOLE METHOD; GUELPH PERMEAMETER; PUMPING TEST METHOD; VELOCITY PERMEAMETER;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号：
0828 ;
摘要：
A comparison was made of the Guelph permeameter, the velocity permeameter, a pumping test procedure, and the auger hole method for measuring saturated hydraulic conductivity. The methods were compared on a Ravenna silt loam and a Hoytville silty clay loam. The evaluations were conducted during high water table conditions established by subirrigation. All the methods showed a wide variability in saturated hydraulic conductivity within each research plot. The pumping test, auger hole, and velocity permeameter methods provided results within similar ranges whereas the Guelph permeameter provided significantly lower estimates. Saturated hydraulic conductivity estimates for the Ravenna silt loam ranged from 0.03 to 35 mm/h with an average value of 3.4 mm/h. Estimates for the Hoytville silty clay loam ranged from 0.01 to 260 mm/h with an average value of 2.2 mm/h.
引用
收藏
页码：1925 / 1931
页数：7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A COMPARISON OF 3 FIELD METHODS FOR MEASURING SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
    LEE, DM
    REYNOLDS, WD
    ELRICK, DE
    CLOTHIER, BE
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1985, 65 (03) : 563 - 573
  • [2] Methods for measuring field-saturated hydraulic conductivity
    Luna-Sáez, D
    Sánchez-Reyes, C
    Muñoz-Pardo, J
    INGENIERIA HIDRAULICA EN MEXICO, 2005, 20 (02): : 95 - 107
  • [3] COMPARISON OF 3 FIELD METHODS FOR DETERMINING SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
    DEBOER, DW
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 1979, 22 (03): : 569 - 572
  • [4] COMPARISON OF SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY MEASURED BY VARIOUS FIELD METHODS
    GUPTA, RK
    RUDRA, RP
    DICKINSON, WT
    PATNI, NK
    WALL, GJ
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 1993, 36 (01): : 51 - 55
  • [5] METHODS FOR MEASURING THE SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY OF TILLS
    JENSSEN, PD
    NORDIC HYDROLOGY, 1990, 21 (02) : 95 - 106
  • [6] COMPARISON OF TWO FIELD METHODS FOR MEASURING SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY IN THE MID SINU VALLEY SOILS (CORDOBA, COLOMBIA)
    Prieto, Bernardo
    Tamara, Ricardo E.
    Peroza, Jose A.
    TEMAS AGRARIOS, 2006, 11 (02): : 36 - 44
  • [7] Comparison of Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity Estimated by Three Different Methods
    Hwang, Hyoun-Tae
    Jeen, Sung-Wook
    Suleiman, Ayman A.
    Lee, Kang-Kun
    WATER, 2017, 9 (12):
  • [8] AN INFILTRATION METHOD FOR MEASURING THE SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS
    STGATH
    FREDE, HG
    MEYER, B
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PFLANZENERNAHRUNG UND BODENKUNDE, 1990, 153 (01): : 1 - 4
  • [9] Evaluation of Different Methods for Measuring Field Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity under High and Low Water Table
    Noshadi, Masoud
    Parvizi, Hossein
    Sepaskhah, Ali Reza
    VADOSE ZONE JOURNAL, 2012, 11 (01):
  • [10] A comparison of three measuring methods for estimating the saturated hydraulic conductivity in the shallow subsurface layer of mountain podzols
    Jacka, Lukas
    Pavlasek, Jirka
    Kuraz, Vaclav
    Pech, Pavel
    GEODERMA, 2014, 219 : 82 - 88
12345