Clinical comparison of two initial arch wires (A-NiTi and Heat Activated NiTi) for amount of tooth alignment and perception of pain: A randomized clinical trial

被引:1
|
作者
Mahmoudzadeh, Majid [1 ]
Farhadian, Maryam [2 ]
Alijani, Sara [1 ]
Azizi, Fatemeh [3 ]
机构
[1] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Dent Fac, Orthodont Dept, Hamadan, Iran
[2] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Biostat Modeling Noncommunicable Dis Res Ctr, Hamadan, Iran
[3] Kermanshah Univ Med Sci, Dent Fac, Orthodont Dept, Kermanshah, Iran
关键词
Orthodontic wire; Alignment; Pain;
D O I
10.1016/j.ortho.2018.01.007
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare two initial arch wires, 0.014 '' A-NiTi and 0.016 '' Heat Activated NiTi (HANT), for amount of tooth alignment and perception of pain. Materials and methods: In total, 59 orthodontic patients (21 males and 38 females) from three orthodontic clinics participated in this 2-arm, parallel-group clinical trial and were randomized to 0.014 '' A-NiTi (n = 30) or 0.016 '' HANT groups (n = 29). Patient recruitment commenced in April 2016 and ended in December 2016. Age of the patients was between 12 to 25 years with an average of 17.92 +/- 3.74 years. Eligibility criteria included permanent dentition, non-extraction treatment plan in lower arch, Irregularity Index > 2 in lower arch, no systemic disease influencing pain, no chronic Non Steroid Anti Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) therapy, and no history of dental pain, mucosal ulcers or temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Blinding was applicable to the patients and outcome assessment. The primary outcome was to compare the reduction of the Irregularity Index mean from bonding sessions to 4 weeks later in these groups and the secondary outcome was evaluation of the pain according to the modified McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) with Visual Analogue Scale questionnaire (VAS). Results: The mean differences of irregularity indices between the two groups are not statistically significant (95% CI: 0.39-1.03; P = 0.36) and according to the questionnaire, there was no significant difference between the two groups in trigger, site, description, duration, beginning, medication, and pain reduction over time. However, the VAS scale of HANT group was significantly higher than that of A-NiTi (P = 0.04). Conclusion: Results from this investigation suggested that there was no clinical difference in amount of tooth alignment and perception of pain between 0.0140 '' A-NiTi and 0.016 '' HANT wires. (C) 2018 CEO. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 72
页数:13
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [21] A comparison between two orthodontic archwire sequences in terms of speed of alignment and root resorption: a randomized controlled clinical trial
    Mutaz Z. Elhanouty
    Kazem S. Al-Nimri
    Sawsan A. Alomari
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2023, 27 : 5671 - 5678
  • [22] A comparison between two orthodontic archwire sequences in terms of speed of alignment and root resorption: a randomized controlled clinical trial
    Elhanouty, Mutaz Z. Z.
    Al-Nimri, Kazem S. S.
    Alomari, Sawsan A. A.
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2023, 27 (09) : 5671 - 5678
  • [23] Tooth and bone changes after initial anterior dental alignment using preformed vs customized nickel titanium archwires in adults: A randomized clinical trial
    Phermsang-ngarm, Papatpong
    Charoemratrote, Chairat
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2018, 88 (04) : 425 - 434
  • [24] Comparison of alignment efficacy and arch dimensions changes with superelastic-, heat-activated-, and seven stranded coaxial nickel-titanium archwires during fixed orthodontic treatment - A double-blind randomized clinical trial
    Sharma, Shivani
    Verma, Sanjeev
    Kumar, Vinay
    Verma, Raj Kumar
    Singh, Satinder Pal
    APOS TRENDS IN ORTHODONTICS, 2024, 14 (03) : 148 - 155
  • [25] Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing the effects of a masticatory bite wafer and avoidance of hard food on pain associated with initial orthodontic tooth movement
    Otasevic, Mladen
    Naini, Farhad B.
    Gill, Daljit S.
    Lee, Robert T.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2006, 130 (01) : 6.e9 - 6.e15
  • [26] Comparison of the efficiency of initial dental alignment with Invisalign® aligners changed every 7 or 14 days in mature adults: Randomized clinical trial
    Fialho, Tiago
    de Freitas, Karina Maria Salvatore
    Ohira, Eduardo Terumi Blatt
    de Souza, Jose Eduardo Prado
    de Oliveira, Renata Cristina Gobbi
    de Oliveira, Ricardo Cesar Gobbi
    Valarelli, Fabricio Pinelli
    Pinzan-Vercelino, Celia Regina Maio
    Cotrin, Paula
    ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2024, 27 (04) : 544 - 551
  • [27] Comparison of efficacy and pain perception using 0.5% Bupivacaine and 2% Lidocaine in periodontal Surgery - A split mouth randomized clinical trial
    Tirumalasetty, Shanmukha Srinivas Manikanta
    Doraisami, Dwarakanath Chinniswami
    Ramesh, Konathala S., V
    Penmetsa, Gautami S.
    Sruthima, N. V. S. G.
    EUROPEAN ORAL RESEARCH, 2021, 55 (03) : 139 - 145
  • [28] Comparison of preemptive ibuprofen, acetaminophen, and placebo administration in reducing peri- and postoperative pain in primary tooth extraction: A randomized clinical trial
    Raslan, Nabih
    Zouzou, Toufic
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DENTAL RESEARCH, 2021, 7 (06): : 1045 - 1052
  • [29] Comparison of Hypnotic Suggestion and Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation Effects on Pain Perception and the Descending Pain Modulating System: A Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial
    Serrano, Gerardo Beltran
    Rodrigues, Laura Pooch
    Schein, Bruno
    Souza, Andressa
    Torres, Iraci L. S.
    Antunes, Luciana da Conceicao
    Fregni, Felipe
    Caumo, Wolnei
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 13
  • [30] Comparison of two different manual techniques for an exercise program for the management of chronic neck pain: A randomized clinical trial study
    Lytras, Dimitrios
    Sykaras, Evaggelos
    Iakovidis, Paris
    Kasimis, Konstantinos
    Kottaras, Anastasios
    Mouratidou, Charikleia
    JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION, 2023, 36 (01) : 199 - 216