TREATMENT OF SEPTIC SHOCK WITH A PROTEASE INHIBITOR IN A CANINE MODEL - A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIAL

被引:42
|
作者
TANI, T
AOKI, H
YOSHIOKA, T
LIN, KJ
KODAMA, M
机构
[1] First Department of Surgery, Shiga University of Medical Science, Seta Otsu-shi
关键词
SHOCK; ENDOTOXIC; SEPTICEMIA; BACTEREMIA; PROTEASE INHIBITOR; SUPEROXIDE; CYTOKINE; SWAN-GANZ CATHETERIZATION; PHAGOCYTOSIS; LACTIC ACIDOSIS; ESCHERICHIA-COLI;
D O I
10.1097/00003246-199306000-00023
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and mechanism of action of a protease inhibitor (ulinastatin) in septic shock. Design: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Setting. A university laboratory. Subjects: Twelve mongrel dogs. Interventions. One of the protease inhibitors, ulinastatin, a glycoprotein (molecular weight 67,000 daltons) detected in human urine was estimated. We used Escherichia coli to obtain a model of septic shock in dogs in vivo study. Human neutrophils were used as an activating target in vitro. Measurements and Main Results: The final concentration of E. coli was 1.9 x 10(6) colony-forming units/mL. There was no significant difference in E. coli concentration between ulinastatin-treated and control groups. Human neutrophils treated with 100 U/mL of ulinastatin showed 70.5 % to 78.7 % of the superoxide production or untreated neutrophils. Phagocytic activity was enhanced in a dose-dependently manner by ulinastatin. At a ulinastatin concentration of 100 U/mL, an approximate two-fold increase in activation was found. In the ulinastatin-treated group, cardiac index, blood pressure, lactic acid, blood glucose, and blood base values significantly improved 60 mins after ulinastatin administration, and the bacterial count was significantly decreased, while the endotoxin concentration in the control group showed a continuous increase of endotoxin concentration. The improvement in the monitored factors observed 60 mins after initiation of treatment persisted after the end of treatment. The survival rate after 1 wk in the ulinastatin-treated group was 84% (five of six dogs survived), while it was 16% (one of six dogs survived) in the control group (p = .04). Conclusions: Ulinastatin does not have antimicrobial activity, and it does not sufficiently activate phagocytes. It is suggested that the efficacy of this agent in experimental septic shock is due to a mechanism that activates the reticuloendothelial system and septic reactions.
引用
收藏
页码:925 / 930
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Successful Treatment With Continuous Enteral Protease Inhibitor in a Patient With Severe Septic Shock
    Lee, Y. -T.
    Wei, J.
    Chuang, Y. -C.
    Chang, C. -Y.
    Chen, I. -C.
    Weng, C. -F.
    Schmid-Schoenbein, G. W.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2012, 44 (03) : 817 - 819
  • [22] The Interaction of Vasopressin and Corticosteroids in Septic Shock: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
    Gordon, Anthony C.
    Mason, Alexina J.
    Perkins, Gavin D.
    Stotz, Martin
    Terblanche, Marius
    Ashby, Deborah
    Brett, Stephen J.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2014, 42 (06) : 1325 - 1333
  • [23] ESMOLOL TO TREAT THE HEMODYNAMIC EFFECTS OF SEPTIC SHOCK: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Cocchi, Michael N.
    Dargin, James
    Chase, Maureen
    Patel, Parth, V
    Grossestreuer, Anne
    Balaji, Lakshman
    Liu, Xiaowen
    Moskowitz, Ari
    Berg, Katherine
    Donnino, Michael W.
    SHOCK, 2022, 57 (04): : 508 - 517
  • [24] Vasopressin infusion in SIRS find septic shock: A randomized controlled trial
    Patel, B
    Chittock, D
    Walley, K
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1999, 159 (03) : A608 - A608
  • [25] HEART RATE CONTROL WITH ESMOLOL SEPTIC SHOCK: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Morelli, A.
    Ertmer, C.
    Rehberg, S.
    Orecchioni, A.
    Cecchini, V.
    Di Russo, A.
    Guarracino, F.
    DFCOEEgidio, A.
    Pietropaoli, P.
    Westphal, M.
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 37 : S104 - S104
  • [26] TREATMENT OF GRAM-NEGATIVE SEPTIC SHOCK WITH AN IMMUNOGLOBULIN PREPARATION - A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL
    SCHEDEL, I
    DREIKHAUSEN, U
    NENTWIG, B
    HOCKENSCHNIEDER, M
    RAUTHMANN, D
    BALIKCIOGLU, S
    COLDEWEY, R
    DEICHER, H
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1991, 19 (09) : 1104 - 1113
  • [27] TREATMENT OF GRAM-NEGATIVE SEPTIC SHOCK WITH AN IMMUNOGLOBULIN PREPARATION - A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL
    WORTEL, CH
    DELLINGER, RP
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1993, 21 (01) : 163 - 164
  • [28] Metabolic resuscitation therapy in critically ill patients with sepsis and septic shock: A pilot prospective randomized controlled trial
    Feng, Fang
    Yang, Huyong
    Yang, Weiwei
    Chen, Yu
    OPEN MEDICINE, 2023, 18 (01):
  • [29] ENDOTOXEMIA DURING ANTIBIOTIC-TREATMENT IN A CANINE MODEL OF SEPTIC SHOCK
    DANNER, RL
    NATANSON, C
    AKIN, GL
    HOSSEINI, JM
    WALKER, RI
    MACVITTIE, TJ
    ELIN, R
    PARRILLO, JE
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1987, 15 (04) : 441 - 441
  • [30] Role of echocardiography in reducing shock reversal time in pediatric septic shock: a randomized controlled trial
    EL-Nawawy, Ahmed A.
    Abdelmohsen, Aly M.
    Hassouna, Hadir M.
    JORNAL DE PEDIATRIA, 2018, 94 (01) : 31 - 39