HYLIFE-II INERTIAL FUSION ENERGY POWER-PLANT DESIGN

被引:19
|
作者
MOIR, RW
机构
来源
FUSION TECHNOLOGY | 1992年 / 21卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.13182/FST92-A29929
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
The HYLIFE-II inertial fusion power plant design study uses a liquid fall, in the form of jets, to protect the first structural wall from neutron damage, x rays, and blast to provide a 30-y lifetime. HYLIFE-I used liquid lithium. HYLIFE-II avoids the fire hazard of lithium by using a molten salt composed of fluorine, lithium, and beryllium (Li2BeF4) called Flibe. Access for heavy-ion beams is provided. Calculations for assumed heavy-ion beam performance show a nominal gain of 70 at 5 MJ producing 350 MJ, about 5.2 times less yield than the 1.8 GJ from a driver energy of 4.5 MJ with gain of 400 for HYLIFE-I. The nominal 1 GWe of power can be maintained by increasing the repetition rate by a factor of about 5.2, from 1.5 to 8 Hz. A higher repetition rate requires faster re-establishment of the jets after a shot, which can be accomplished in part by decreasing the jet fall height and increasing the jet flow velocity. In addition, although not adequately considered for HYLIFE-I, there is liquid splash that must be forcibly cleared because gravity is too slow, at higher repetition rates than 1 Hz. Splash removal is accomplished in the central region by oscillating jet flows. The cost of electricity is estimated to be 0.09 $/kW.h in constant 1988 dollars, about twice that of future coal and light water reactor nuclear power. The driver beam cost is about one-half the total cost, that is, a zero cost driver would give a calculated cost of electricity of 0.045 $/kWh.
引用
收藏
页码:1475 / 1486
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] THERMAL-CONVERSION SYSTEM FOR THE PROMETHEUS-L INERTIAL FUSION ENERGY POWER-PLANT
    ESTREICH, PJ
    OSTROW, SL
    HALLER, K
    FUSION TECHNOLOGY, 1992, 21 (03): : 1506 - 1513
  • [32] Uncertainty analysis in fusion activation calculations: Application to the waste disposal assessment of HYLIFE-II structure
    Sanz, J
    Juan, J
    Latkowski, JF
    FUSION TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 30 (03): : 1557 - 1563
  • [33] HIBALL - A CONCEPTUAL DESIGN STUDY OF A HEAVY-ION DRIVEN INERTIAL CONFINEMENT FUSION POWER-PLANT
    BOHNE, D
    HOFMANN, I
    KESSLER, G
    KULCINSKI, GL
    MEYERTERVEHN, J
    VONMOLLENDORFF, U
    MOSES, GA
    MULLER, RW
    SVIATOSLAVSKY, IN
    SZE, DK
    VOGELSANG, W
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 1982, 73 (02) : 195 - 200
  • [34] Power plant design and accelerator technology for heavy ion inertial fusion energy
    Sharkov, BY
    Alexeev, NN
    Basko, MM
    Churazov, MD
    Koshkarev, DG
    Medin, SA
    Orlov, YN
    Suslin, VM
    NUCLEAR FUSION, 2005, 45 (10) : S291 - S297
  • [35] Accident doses analysis of the SOMBRERO inertial fusion energy power plant design
    Reyes, S
    Latkowski, JF
    del Rio, JG
    Sanz, J
    FUSION TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 39 (02): : 941 - 945
  • [36] OSIRIS AND SOMBRERO INERTIAL FUSION POWER-PLANT DESIGNS - SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
    MEIER, WR
    FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 1994, 25 (1-3) : 145 - 157
  • [37] PARAMETRIC DESIGN STUDY OF A NUCLEAR-PUMPED LASER-DRIVEN INERTIAL CONFINEMENT FUSION POWER-PLANT
    BELLER, DE
    JACOBSON, JM
    MILEY, GH
    PETRA, M
    SHABAN, Y
    LASER AND PARTICLE BEAMS, 1993, 11 (03) : 537 - 548
  • [38] POWER-PLANT DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS FOR ENERGY-CONSERVATION
    DECKER, GL
    COMBUSTION, 1976, 48 (01): : 20 - 21
  • [39] COST COMPONENTS OF FUSION POWER-PLANT
    ARONSTEIN, RE
    GHOSE, SK
    JOURNAL OF THE INSTITUTION OF NUCLEAR ENGINEERS, 1978, 19 (05): : 142 - 149
  • [40] POWER-PLANT ENERGY CONSERVATION
    ROBERTSON, JC
    COMBUSTION, 1975, 47 (02): : 8 - 8