RESPONSE COMPETITION - A MAJOR SOURCE OF INTERFERENCE IN A TACTILE IDENTIFICATION TASK

被引:34
|
作者
EVANS, PM [1 ]
CRAIG, JC [1 ]
机构
[1] INDIANA UNIV,BLOOMINGTON,IN 47401
来源
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS | 1992年 / 51卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.3758/BF03212244
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Two experiments investigated the ability of subjects to identify a moving, tactile stimulus. In both experiments, the subjects were presented with a target to their left index fingerpad and a nontarget (also moving) to their left middle fingerpad. Subjects were instructed to attend only to the target location and to respond "1" if the stimulus moved either to the left or up the finger, and to respond "2" if the stimulus moved either right or down the finger. The results showed that accuracy was better and reaction times were faster when the target and nontarget moved in the same direction than when they moved in different directions. When the target and nontarget moved in different directions, accuracy was significantly better and reaction times were significantly faster when the two stimuli had the same assigned response than when they had different responses. The results provide support for the conclusion that movement information is processed across adjacent fingers to the level of incipient response activation, even when subjects attempt to focus their attention on one location on the skin.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 206
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Multi-Source Interference Task: validation study with fMRI in individual subjects
    Bush, G
    Shin, LM
    Holmes, J
    Rosen, BR
    Vogt, BA
    MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 8 (01) : 60 - 70
  • [42] Sensitivity evaluation of the visual, tactile, and auditory detection response task method while driving
    Stojmenova, Kristina
    Jakus, Grega
    Sodnik, Jaka
    TRAFFIC INJURY PREVENTION, 2017, 18 (04) : 431 - 436
  • [43] Competition Task Development for Response Robot Innovation in World Robot Summit
    Kimura, T.
    Okugawa, M.
    Oogane, K.
    Ohtsubo, Y.
    Shimizu, M.
    Takahashi, T.
    Tadokoro, S.
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SAFETY, SECURITY AND RESCUE ROBOTICS (SSRR), 2017, : 129 - 130
  • [44] Dual-task interference during initial learning of a new motor task results from competition for the same brain areas
    Remy, Florence
    Wenderoth, Nicole
    Lipkens, Karen
    Swinnen, Stephan P.
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2010, 48 (09) : 2517 - 2527
  • [45] Differential maintenance of auditory and tactile working memory: evidence from the cross-modal selective interference task
    Li, Shuting
    Yang, Xinyue
    Zhang, Yiyue
    Wang, Chundi
    CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, : 31195 - 31205
  • [46] Stroop-like interference in a match-to-sample task: Further evidence for semantic competition?
    Green, Marshall L.
    Locker, Lawrence, Jr.
    Boyer, Ty W.
    Sturz, Bradley R.
    LEARNING AND MOTIVATION, 2016, 56 : 53 - 64
  • [47] Conscious error perception: The impact of response interference from a secondary task
    Robinson, Maria M.
    Irwin, David E.
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2017, 79 (03) : 863 - 877
  • [48] Specificity of Practice Effects on Response Interference in a Two-Choice Task
    Hart, M. A.
    Reeve, T. G.
    JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 19 : S61 - S61
  • [49] Conscious error perception: The impact of response interference from a secondary task
    Maria M. Robinson
    David E. Irwin
    Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2017, 79 : 863 - 877
  • [50] Semantic interference in a delayed naming task: Evidence for the response exclusion hypothesis
    Janssen, Niels
    Schirm, Walter
    Mahon, Bradford Z.
    Caramazza, Alfonso
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2008, 34 (01) : 249 - 256