RESPONSE COMPETITION - A MAJOR SOURCE OF INTERFERENCE IN A TACTILE IDENTIFICATION TASK

被引:34
|
作者
EVANS, PM [1 ]
CRAIG, JC [1 ]
机构
[1] INDIANA UNIV,BLOOMINGTON,IN 47401
来源
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS | 1992年 / 51卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.3758/BF03212244
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Two experiments investigated the ability of subjects to identify a moving, tactile stimulus. In both experiments, the subjects were presented with a target to their left index fingerpad and a nontarget (also moving) to their left middle fingerpad. Subjects were instructed to attend only to the target location and to respond "1" if the stimulus moved either to the left or up the finger, and to respond "2" if the stimulus moved either right or down the finger. The results showed that accuracy was better and reaction times were faster when the target and nontarget moved in the same direction than when they moved in different directions. When the target and nontarget moved in different directions, accuracy was significantly better and reaction times were significantly faster when the two stimuli had the same assigned response than when they had different responses. The results provide support for the conclusion that movement information is processed across adjacent fingers to the level of incipient response activation, even when subjects attempt to focus their attention on one location on the skin.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 206
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Interference in identifying tactile patterns: Response competition and temporal integration
    Craig, JC
    SOMATOSENSORY AND MOTOR RESEARCH, 1996, 13 (3-4): : 199 - 213
  • [2] Tactile pattern perception by two fingers: Temporal interference and response competition
    James C. Craig
    Xiuying Qian
    Perception & Psychophysics, 1997, 59 : 252 - 265
  • [3] Tactile pattern perception by two fingers: Temporal interference and response competition
    Craig, JC
    Qian, XY
    PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1997, 59 (02): : 252 - 265
  • [4] TACTILE ATTENTION AND RESPONSE COMPETITION
    EVANS, PM
    CRAIG, JC
    BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY, 1991, 29 (06) : 499 - 499
  • [5] Neural basis of the Stroop interference task: Response competition or selective attention?
    Mead, LA
    Mayer, AR
    Bobholz, JA
    Woodley, SJ
    Cunningham, JM
    Hammeke, TA
    Rao, SM
    JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2002, 8 (06) : 735 - 742
  • [6] SEMANTIC NATURE OF RESPONSE COMPETITION IN THE PICTURE-WORD INTERFERENCE TASK
    LUPKER, SJ
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 1979, 7 (06) : 485 - 495
  • [7] Microsaccadic and Pupillary Response to Tactile Task Difficulty
    Zurawska, Justyna
    ETRA 2019: 2019 ACM SYMPOSIUM ON EYE TRACKING RESEARCH & APPLICATIONS, 2019,
  • [8] Sensory and response interference by ipsilesional stimuli in tactile extinction
    Vaishnavi, S
    Calhoun, J
    Southwood, MH
    Chatterjee, A
    CORTEX, 2000, 36 (01) : 81 - 92
  • [9] The Source of Execution-Related Dual-Task Interference: Motor Bottleneck or Response Monitoring?
    Bratzke, Daniel
    Rolke, Bettina
    Ulrich, Rolf
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2009, 35 (05) : 1413 - 1426
  • [10] The multi-source interference task: The effect of randomization
    Stins, JF
    Van Leeuwen, WMA
    de Geus, EJC
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 27 (06) : 711 - 717