Safety and effectiveness of different dosage of mifepristone for the treatment of uterine fibroids: a double-blind randomized clinical trial

被引:13
|
作者
Carbonell, Josep Ll [1 ]
Acosta, Rita [2 ]
P, Yasmiriam Rez [2 ]
Marrero, Ana G. [2 ]
Trellez, Edilia [2 ]
Sanchez, Carlos [2 ]
Tomasi, Giuseppe [3 ]
机构
[1] Mediterranea Med Clin, C-14 Salvador Guinot, Valencia 46017, Spain
[2] Eusebio Hernandez Gynecol & Obstet Teaching Hosp, Havana, Cuba
[3] Univ Basque Country, San Sebastian, Spain
关键词
mifepristone; leiomyoma; fibroid; antiprogestins;
D O I
10.2147/IJWH.S33125
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and improvement in quality of life using 10 mg and 5 mg daily doses of mifepristone for the treatment of uterine fibroids. Design: The research was a randomized double- blind clinical study undertaken at the Eusebio Hernandez Hospital in Havana, Cuba. Subjects and methods: Seventy subjects with symptomatic uterine fibroids took one daily capsule of 10 mg or 5 mg mifepristone orally for 9 months. One to three endometrial biopsies were performed. In evaluating safety, the variables studied were endometrial changes associated with mifepristone, elevation of hepatic transaminases, side effects of mifepristone, and instances and duration of irregular bleeding. Results: There were 30/49 (61.2%) and 13/24 (54.2%) diagnoses of endometrial changes associated with mifepristone in the 10 mg and 5 mg groups, respectively (P = 0.282). At every evaluation visit the average endometrial thickness was significantly greater in the 10 mg group than in the 5 mg group (P = 0.013, P = 0.002, and P = 0.013, respectively). Only five subjects had slight elevations in their hepatic transaminases after 9 months' treatment. Sixteen of 35 (45.7%) and eight of 33 (24.2%) subjects had the occasional hot flush in the 10 mg and 5 mg groups, respectively (P= 0.032). In total, there were 12.9 +/- 4.6 (n = 21) and 9.1 +/- 3.9 (n = 18) days of irregular bleeding in the 10 mg and 5 mg groups, respectively (P = 0.009). Conclusion: According to the study findings, a 5 mg daily dose over 9 months has a relatively better safety profile than the 10 mg dose.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 124
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] The Role of Probiotics in the Treatment of Dysentery: a Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial
    Alireza Sharif
    Hamed Haddad Kashani
    Elahe Nasri
    Zahra Soleimani
    Mohammad Reza Sharif
    Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins, 2017, 9 : 380 - 385
  • [12] Mifepristone 5 mg versus 10 mg for emergency contraception: double-blind randomized clinical trial
    Lluis Carbonell, Josep
    Garcia, Ramon
    Gonzalez, Adriana
    Breto, Andres
    Sanchez, Carlos
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2015, 7 : 95 - 102
  • [13] THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SAFFRON PILL IN TREATMENT OF OSTEOARTHRITIS: A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Firoozabadi, M.
    Aghei, M.
    Mirfeizi, S. Z.
    Roshandel, G. R.
    Ahi, N. Abdol
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2018, 36 (01) : S62 - S62
  • [14] Double-blind, randomized clinical trial for safety and efficacy of norfloxacin for shigellosis in children
    Bhattacharya, SK
    Bhattacharya, MK
    Dutta, D
    Dutta, S
    Deb, M
    Deb, A
    Das, KP
    Koley, H
    Nair, GB
    ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 1997, 86 (03) : 319 - 320
  • [15] A double-blind randomized clinical trial on the effectiveness of a daily glycolic acid 5% formulation in the treatment of photoaging
    Thibault, PK
    Wlodarczyk, J
    Wenck, A
    DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 1998, 24 (05) : 573 - 577
  • [16] Efficacy and Safety of the Two Ayurveda Drug Regimens in Uterine Fibroids: A Randomized Single-Blind Clinical Trial
    Karunagoda, K. P. K. R.
    Perera, P. K.
    Senanayake, H.
    Weliange, S. De Silva
    EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 2021
  • [17] Efficacy and safety of venlafaxine versus nortriptyline for the preventive treatment of migraine: A double-blind randomized clinical trial
    Roghani, Mehrdad
    Ghaedi, Gholamhossein
    Iranzadeh, Saeid
    Golezar, Mohammad Hossein
    Afshinmajd, Siamak
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 243
  • [18] Value and Safety of High Flow Oxygenation in the Treatment of Inpatient Asthma, a Randomized, Double-Blind, Clinical Trial
    Fakharian, A.
    Raeisi, S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 199
  • [19] Double-blind, randomized, controlled trial of atosiban and ritodrine in the treatment of preterm labor: A multicenter effectiveness and safety study
    Moutquin, JM
    Sherman, D
    Cohen, H
    Mohide, PT
    Hochner-Celnikier, D
    Fejgin, M
    Liston, RM
    Dansereau, J
    Mazor, M
    Shalev, E
    Boucher, M
    Glezerman, M
    Zimmer, EZ
    Rabinovici, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 182 (05) : 1191 - 1199
  • [20] Clinical Trial of Ozonated Water Enema for the Treatment of Fibromyalgia: A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial
    Hou, Qianhao
    Zhang, Jinyuan
    Su, Zehua
    Wang, Xiaomei
    Fang, Hongwei
    Qian, Shuwen
    Shi, Haobing
    Wang, Qing
    Li, Yuling
    Lin, Jiaqi
    Wang, Xiangrui
    Wang, Zetian
    Liao, Lijun
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2025, 28 (01) : e13 - e22