HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE TO TRICHLOROETHYLENE

被引:19
|
作者
BROWN, LP
FARRAR, DG
DEROOIJ, CG
机构
[1] ICI PLC,EPIDEMIOL UNIT,MACCLESFIELD SK10 4TJ,CHESHIRE,ENGLAND
[2] SOLVAY & CIE SA,B-1120 BRUSSELS,BELGIUM
[3] ICI CHEM & POLYMERS LTD,RUNCORN WA7 4QF,CHESHIRE,ENGLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0273-2300(90)90005-V
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
A review of the animal data showed trichloroethylene (TRI) to be of low acute toxicity. Repeated exposure showed that the target organs were the liver and, to a lesser extent, the kidney. TRI is not mutagenic or only marginally mutagenic. There is no evidence of fetotoxicity or teratogenicity. TRI is judged not to exhibit chronic neurotoxicity. Lifetime bioassays resulted in tumors in both the mouse and the rat. However, because of qualitative and quantitative metabolic differences between rodent and human, no one suitable tumor site can be chosen for human health risk assessment. In addition, of the several epidemiology studies, none has demonstrated a positive association for increased tumor incidence. A review of the health effects in humans shows TRI to be of low acute toxicity and, following chronic high doses, to be hepatotoxic. Environmental exposure to TRI is mainly via the atmosphere, while the contribution from exposure to drinking water and foodstuffs is negligible. The total body burden was calculated as 22 μg/day. The safety margin approach based on human health effects showed that TRI levels are well within the safety margin for the human no-observable-effect level (10,000 times lower). The total body burden represents a risk of 1.4 × 10-5 by linearized multistage modeling. Therefore, by either methodological approach to risk assessment, the environmental occurrence of TRI does not represent a significant health risk to the general population or to the population in areas close to industrial activities. © 1990.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 41
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Health risk assessment of chemical exposure
    Hall, S.K.
    Pollution Engineering, 1988, 20 (12) : 92 - 97
  • [22] Environmental exposure, species differences and risk assessment
    Miyamoto, J
    Klein, W
    PURE AND APPLIED CHEMISTRY, 1998, 70 (09) : 1829 - 1845
  • [23] Assessment of Environmental Risk for Exposure to Industrial Emissions
    Villanova, Martina
    Orcellet, Emiliana
    Retamar, Soledad
    Diez, Sebastian
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2021, 38 (01) : 24 - 30
  • [24] Methods for health risk assessment related to arsenic environmental exposure and possible areas for improvement
    Le Prieur, E.
    Arnaud, C.
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2011, 205 : S264 - S265
  • [25] Risk assessment and management in environmental health
    Carrier, G
    SUMMER CONFERENCE ON TECHNOLOGY 1999, 1999, : 3 - 3
  • [26] RISK ASSESSMENT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL-HEALTH
    SOMERS, E
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SANTE PUBLIQUE, 1979, 70 (06): : 388 - 392
  • [27] Environmental health, risk assessment, and democracy
    Kamrin, MA
    ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 1998, 106 (05) : A216 - A216
  • [28] Environmental and human health risk assessment
    Lahaniatis, MR
    Pakalin, S
    Kettrup, A
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2002, 11 (10A): : 713 - 735
  • [29] Mutagenicity of trichloroethylene and its metabolites: Implications for the risk assessment of trichloroethylene
    Moore, MM
    Harrington-Brock, K
    ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2000, 108 : 215 - 223
  • [30] ASSESSMENT OF INTERMITTENT TRICHLOROETHYLENE EXPOSURE IN VAPOR DEGREASING
    ULANDER, A
    SELDEN, A
    AHLBORG, G
    AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1992, 53 (11): : 742 - 743