Technology assessment for wastewater treatment using multiple-attribute decision-making

被引:63
|
作者
Kalbar, Pradip P. [1 ]
Karmakar, Subhankar [1 ]
Asolekar, Shyam R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Ctr Environm Sci & Engn, Bombay 400076, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Technology assessment; Multiple-attribute decision-making; Wastewater treatment; Sustainability assessment; Appropriate technology;
D O I
10.1016/j.techsoc.2012.10.001
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
A framework for technology assessment for wastewater treatment is proposed in this work. A case study of technology selection for high rise buildings in urban centres of India is used for evaluation and to test this framework. The multiple-attribute decision-making technique is used for ranking the alternatives. The three most commonly used wastewater treatment technologies viz., activated sludge process (ASP), sequencing batch reactors (SBR) and membrane bio-reactor (MBR) are evaluated. Seven criteria having indicators derived from life cycle assessment (LCA), life cycle costing (LCC) and criteria accounting for resource constraints, robustness of the system and sustainability are used for the evaluations. The technology assessment framework used in this work will help identify appropriate wastewater treatment technologies for various decision-making situations encountered while managing wastewaters. Importantly, this study validates the theory that it is the decision situation which decides the appropriateness of the technology and not the technology itself. Hence, the definition of appropriate technology given by Murphy et al. [4] is more convincing for water and sanitation technologies. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 302
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Selection of the best well control system by using fuzzy multiple-attribute decision-making methods
    Mokhtari, S. Mostafa
    Alinejad-Rokny, Hamid
    Jalalifar, Hossein
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2014, 41 (05) : 1105 - 1121
  • [22] A hesitant fuzzy multiple-attribute decision-making method considering rank relation
    Xiao, Huimin
    Yang, Peng
    Ma, Xifeng
    Wei, Meng
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2023, 45 (02) : 3109 - 3121
  • [23] MULTIPLE-ATTRIBUTE DECISION-MAKING WITH PARTIAL INFORMATION - EXPECTED-VALUE CRITERION
    CHARNETSKI, JR
    SOLAND, RM
    NAVAL RESEARCH LOGISTICS, 1979, 26 (02) : 249 - 256
  • [24] Multiple-Attribute Group Decision-Making Method under a Neutrosophic Number Environment
    Ye, Jun
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2016, 25 (03) : 377 - 386
  • [25] Finding Missing Links in Complex Networks: A Multiple-Attribute Decision-Making Method
    Li, Longjie
    Bai, Shenshen
    Leng, Mingwei
    Wang, Lu
    Chen, Xiaoyun
    COMPLEXITY, 2018,
  • [26] Diophantine spherical vague sets and their applications for micro-technology robots based on multiple-attribute decision-making
    Palanikumar, Murugan
    Kausar, Nasreen
    Stevic, Zeljko
    Zolfani, Sarfaraz Hashemkhani
    ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2025, 139
  • [27] Multiple-Attribute Decision-Making Problem Using TOPSIS and Choquet Integral with Hesitant Fuzzy Number Information
    Garg, Harish
    Keikha, Abazar
    Nehi, Hassan Mishmast
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2020, 2020
  • [28] INTERACTIVE WEIGHT ASSESSMENT IN MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE DECISION-MAKING
    MOND, B
    ROSINGER, EE
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1985, 22 (01) : 19 - 25
  • [29] Multiple-attribute group decision-making method based on intuitionistic multiplicative linguistic information
    Li, Tao
    Zhang, Liyuan
    COMPUTATIONAL & APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2022, 41 (05):
  • [30] Multiple-attribute decision-making approach for an energy-efficient facility layout design
    Yang, Lei
    Deuse, Jochen
    Jiang, Pingyu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 66 (5-8): : 795 - 807