Economic Potential for Energy Cane Production as a Cellulosic Biofuel Feedstock in the Southeastern United States

被引:1
|
作者
Salassi, Michael E. [1 ]
Falconer, Lawrence L. [2 ]
Mark, Tyler B. [3 ]
Deliberto, Michael A. [1 ]
Hilbun, Brian M. [1 ]
Cooper, Todd L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Agr Ctr, Dept Agr Econ & Agribusiness, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[2] Mississippi State Univ, Delta Res & Extens Ctr, Stoneville, MS USA
[3] Univ Kentucky, Dept Agr Econ, Lexington, KY USA
关键词
cellulosic biofuel; energy cane; biofuel feedstock production cost;
D O I
10.3934/energy.2015.1.25
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 established the Renewable Fuels Standard which set forth goals for domestic renewable fuel production of cellulosic and advanced biofuels in the United States. A major issue confronting the achievement of these biofuel utilization goals is the probability that the eventual expansion of advanced cellulosic biofuel production would be sufficient to meet the stated goals. Current long range projections of cellulosic biofuel production are expected to remain significantly below statutory targets due to the limited supply and expected development of cellulosic biofuel production. The production capacity expansion of advanced cellulosic biofuel has been identified as a major challenge in meeting the Renewable Fuels Standard. Energy cane has been identified as a crop with having significant potential to be developed as a biofuel feedstock crop. The greatest challenge currently facing the production of energy cane is the ability to expand production of the crop outside temperate zones. Within the six-state study area, approximately 1.15 million hectares were identified as idle cropland having the greatest potential for energy cane production. With a low seed cane expansion planting ratio and harvest through a fourth stubble crop, total energy cane production costs were estimated to be $113 per dry metric ton of feedstock. At higher planting ratios, projected total energy cane production costs were below $70 per metric ton.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 40
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Integrated Economic and Environmental Assessment of Cellulosic Biofuel Production in an Agricultural Watershed
    Jingyu Song
    Benjamin M. Gramig
    Raj Cibin
    Indrajeet Chaubey
    BioEnergy Research, 2017, 10 : 509 - 524
  • [42] PEANUT PRODUCTION IN SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
    Stephan, L. LeMar
    ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, 1945, 21 (03) : 183 - 191
  • [43] An integrated renewable energy park approach for algal biofuel production in United States
    Subhadra, Bobban
    Edwards, Mark
    ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (09) : 4897 - 4902
  • [44] Economic evaluation of methyl bromide alternatives for the production of strawberries in the southeastern United States
    Sydorovych, O
    Safley, CD
    Ferguson, LM
    Poling, EB
    Fernandez, GE
    Brannen, PA
    Monks, DM
    Louws, FJ
    HORTTECHNOLOGY, 2006, 16 (01) : 118 - 128
  • [45] Municipal Solid Waste as a Cellulosic Feedstock: A Largely Overlooked Opportunity in the United States
    Bransby, David
    BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2015, 9 (04): : 335 - 336
  • [46] Global Potential of Rice Husk as a Renewable Feedstock for Ethanol Biofuel Production
    Abbas, Ali
    Ansumali, Santosh
    BIOENERGY RESEARCH, 2010, 3 (04) : 328 - 334
  • [47] Global Potential of Rice Husk as a Renewable Feedstock for Ethanol Biofuel Production
    Ali Abbas
    Santosh Ansumali
    BioEnergy Research, 2010, 3 : 328 - 334
  • [48] Potential of Napier grass Pak Chong 1 as feedstock for biofuel production
    Sawasdee, Vanatpornratt
    Pisutpaisal, Nipon
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2021, 7 : 519 - 526
  • [49] Process energy comparison for the production and harvesting of algal biomass as a biofuel feedstock
    Weschler, Matthew K.
    Barr, William J.
    Harper, Willie F.
    Landis, Amy E.
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 153 : 108 - 115
  • [50] Carbon balance and economic performance of pine plantations for bioenergy production in the Southeastern United States
    Jonker, J. G. G.
    van der Hilst, F.
    Markewitz, D.
    Faaij, A. P. C.
    Junginger, H. M.
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2018, 117 : 44 - 55