Risk management system implemented at the US Army Medical Command

被引:2
|
作者
Kashiwagi, Jacob [1 ]
Sullivan, Kenneth [1 ]
Kashiwagi, Dean [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, PBSRG, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA
关键词
Risk management; Quality assurance; Performance measures; Armed forces; United States of America;
D O I
10.1108/14725960910971496
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - To describe the implementation of the Performance Information Risk Management System (PIRMS) to indefinite delivery indefinite quantity (IDIQ) general contractors in the US Army Medical Command (MEDCOM) 26 sites, 150 projects/year, and $250m/year maintenance and repair construction program. Design/methodology/approach - To test the hypothesis that facility owner management, control, and decision making is a source of risk, and that the transfer of risk and control to the contractors will minimise the risk. Findings - Include minimising construction management by 33 percent, motivated contractors to regulate their own contracts, minimised unresolved issues by 50 percent, minimised contractor generated change orders by 20 percent, and moving from doing quality control to quality assurance. Research limitations/implications - The authors see no constraints in the implementation of PIRMS in other organisations. This paper reflects the perceptions of the Arizona State University research team, and publicly available test results, and not the views or policy of the USA Medical Command. Originality/value - Includes the use of dominant performance/risk information from the contractor's weekly risk reports to create accurate performance and risk information on all ongoing projects, the IDIQ contractors, and on the client's/buyer's personnel. Risk information is being used to streamline a large organisation's organisational structure, minimising decision making and transactions, and transferring risk and control to the party who can minimise the technical risk.
引用
收藏
页码:224 / +
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Advancements in dynamic scene projection technologies at the US Army Aviation and Missile Command
    Beasley, DB
    Saylor, DA
    TECHNOLOGIES FOR SYNTHETIC ENVIRONMENTS: HARDWARE-IN-THE-LOOP TESTING V, 2000, 4027 : 278 - 289
  • [32] Allies at War: British and US Army Command Culture in the Italian Campaign, 19431944
    Rose, Patrick
    JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC STUDIES, 2013, 36 (01) : 42 - 75
  • [33] Battlespace awareness and the Australian Army battlefield command support system
    Gaertner, P
    Slade, M
    Bowden, F
    Stagg, B
    Huf, S
    DIGITIZATION OF THE BATTLESPACE V AND BATTLEFIELD BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES II, 2000, 4037 : 23 - 34
  • [34] Graphical User Interface for a Remote Medical Monitoring System: US Army Medic Recommendations
    Kaushik, Sangeeta
    Tharion, William J.
    MILITARY MEDICINE, 2009, 174 (11) : 1190 - 1195
  • [35] A risk management initiative implemented in Canada
    Lacoursiere, JP
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2006, 130 (03) : 311 - 320
  • [36] US Army Casualty Assistance System
    Gutierrez, Thomas A.
    Stramara, Kevin P.
    Tanner, Christopher H.
    Wells, Caleb K.
    Sperling, Brian
    2006 IEEE SYSTEMS AND INFORMATION ENGINEERING DESIGN SYMPOSIUM, 2006, : 180 - +
  • [37] Relative Risk of All-Cause Medical Evacuation for Behavioral Health Conditions in US Central Command
    Hall, Andrew
    Olsen, Cara
    Gomes, Jennifer
    Bajjani-Gebara, Jouhayna
    Meyers, Eric
    Wilson, Ramey
    MILITARY MEDICINE, 2024, 189 (1-2) : e279 - e284
  • [38] The history of the US Army Medical Service Corps.
    Gillett, MC
    BULLETIN OF THE HISTORY OF MEDICINE, 1999, 73 (02) : 348 - 350
  • [39] The US Army Medical Department Commitment to Injury Reduction
    Schoomaker, Eric B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (01) : S217 - S217
  • [40] US army MEDEVAC in the new millennium: A medical perspective
    Gerhardt, RT
    McGhee, JS
    Cloonan, C
    Pfaff, JA
    De Lorenzo, RA
    AVIATION SPACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2001, 72 (07): : 659 - 664