Comparative Study of Intra-cervical Foley's Catheter and PGE(2) Gel for Pre-induction Ripening (Cervical)

被引:9
|
作者
Deshmukh, V. L. [1 ]
Yelikar, K. A. [1 ]
Deshmukh, A. B. [1 ]
机构
[1] GMCH, Dept OBGY, 120,Samarthnagar, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India
来源
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF INDIA | 2011年 / 61卷 / 04期
关键词
Cervical ripening; PGE(2); Foley's catheter;
D O I
10.1007/s13224-011-0063-2
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Aim The success of induction of labor depends on the cervical status at the time of induction. Objective For effective cervical ripening both Foley's catheter and PGE(2) gel are used. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of intra cervical Foley's catheter and intra cervical PGE(2) gel in cervical ripening for the successful induction of labor. Study Design A randomized, prospective study was conducted in the Dept of OBGY, GMCH, Aurangabad from July 2005-January 2008. 400 patients at term with a Bishop's score <= 3 with various indications for induction were randomly allocated to receive (200 pts) intra-cervical Foley's catheter or PGE(2) gel (200 pts). After 6 h post induction, Bishop's score was noted labor was augmented if required. Statistical analysis was done using Chi square test and t test. Result The groups were comparable with respect to maternal age, gestation age, indication of induction and initial Bishop's score. Both the groups showed significant change in the Bishop's score, 5.56 +/- 1.89 and 5.49 +/- 1.82 for Foley's catheter and PGE2 gel, respectively, P < 0.001; However there was no significant difference between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the side effects. Twenty eight cesarean sections (14%) were performed in Group A and 37 (18.5%) were performed in Group B (not significant). The induction to delivery interval was 15.32 +/- 5.24 h in Group A and 14.2 +/- 5.14 h in Group B (P = 0.291). Apgar scores, birth weights and NICU admissions showed no difference between the two groups. Conclusion This study shows that both Foley's Catheter and PGE(2) gel are equally effective in pre induction cervical ripening.
引用
收藏
页码:418 / 421
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Retrospective Comparison of PGE2 Vaginal Insert and Foley Catheter for Outpatient Cervical Ripening
    Blair, Rachel
    Harvey, Marie-Andree
    Pudwell, Jessica
    Bougie, Olga
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2020, 42 (09) : 1103 - 1110
  • [22] Combined Foley Catheter and Prepidil Gel for Cervical Ripening: A Randomized Trial
    Hill, Meg
    Gregg, Anthony
    Brown, Stanette
    Burgis, Judith
    Browne, Paul
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2013, 20 (S3) : 126A - 126A
  • [23] A randomized controlled trial of pre-induction cervical ripening comparing dilapan-s versus foley balloon (DILAFOL trial)
    Saad, Antonio
    Villareal, Josephine
    Eid, Joe
    Spencer, Nicholas
    Ellis, Viviana
    Hankins, Gary D.
    Saade, George
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (01) : S18 - S19
  • [24] Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labor
    Afolabi, BB
    Oyeneyin, OL
    Ogedengbe, OK
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2005, 89 (03) : 263 - 267
  • [25] Intracervical Foley balloon catheter for cervical ripening and labor induction: A review
    Greenberg, Victoria
    Khalifeh, Adeeb
    SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2015, 39 (06) : 441 - 443
  • [26] Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol with Foley Catheter for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
    Roudsari, Fatemeh Vahid
    Ayati, Sedigheh
    Ghasemi, Marzieh
    Mofrad, Maliheh Hasanzadeh
    Shakeri, Mohamad Taghi
    Farshidi, Farnoush
    Shahabian, Masoud
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2011, 10 (01): : 149 - 154
  • [27] USE OF THE FOLEY CATHETER AS A CERVICAL RIPENING AGENT PRIOR TO INDUCTION OF LABOR
    JAMES, C
    PEEDICAYIL, A
    SESHADRI, L
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1994, 47 (03) : 229 - 232
  • [28] Predictors of cesarean delivery in cervical ripening and labor induction with Foley catheter
    Marciniak, Beata
    Patro-Malysza, Jolanta
    Kimber-Trojnar, Zaneta
    Oleszczuk, Jan
    Leszczynska-Gorzelak, Bozena
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2020, 33 (01): : 62 - 67
  • [29] Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient Prostin gel for cervical ripening: the FOG (Foley or Gel) trial
    Henry, A.
    Madan, A.
    Reid, R.
    Tracy, S.
    Sharpe, V
    Austin, K.
    Welsh, A.
    Challis, D.
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2011, 51 (05): : 473 - 474
  • [30] Cervical ripening with Foley catheter for induction of labor after cesarean section: a cohort study
    Jozwiak, Marta
    van de Lest, Hilde A.
    Burger, Nicole B.
    Dijksterhuis, Marja G. K.
    De Leeuw, Jan Willem
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2014, 93 (03) : 296 - 301