LOW-DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN PARTICLE-SIZE AND CORONARY-ARTERY DISEASE

被引:470
|
作者
CAMPOS, H
GENEST, JJ
BLIJLEVENS, E
MCNAMARA, JR
JENNER, JL
ORDOVAS, JM
WILSON, PWF
SCHAEFER, EJ
机构
[1] TUFTS UNIV,USDA,HUMAN NUTR RES CTR AGING,LIPID METAB LAB,711 WASHINGTON ST,BOSTON,MA 02111
[2] NEW ENGLAND MED CTR HOSP,DEPT MED,DIV CARDIOL,BOSTON,MA
[3] NHLBI,FRAMINGHAM HEART STUDY,FRAMINGHAM,MA
来源
ARTERIOSCLEROSIS AND THROMBOSIS | 1992年 / 12卷 / 02期
关键词
LOW DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN PARTICLE SIZE; GRADIENT GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; PLASMA LIPOPROTEINS; TRIGLYCERIDES; CHOLESTEROL; APOLIPOPROTEINS; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE;
D O I
10.1161/01.ATV.12.2.187
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Decreased plasma low density lipoprotein (LDL) particle size has been associated with premature coronary artery disease (CAD). We examined LDL particle size by 2-16% gradient gel electrophoresis in 275 men with CAD (> 75% cross-sectional-area stenosis) and 822 controls. Seven major LDL size bands (with LDL-1 [d = 1.025-1.033 g/ml] being the largest and LDL-7 [d = 1.050-1.063 g/ml, the smallest]) were identified. Because most subjects had two or more adjacent LDL bands, an LDL score was calculated for each subject, with the relative area in each band taken into consideration. Four major LDL particle size groups were classified in the present studies: large LDL, intermediate LDL, small LDL, and very small LDL. The use of beta-blockers was significantly associated with smaller LDL particles. After adjusting for use of this medication, small LDL particles were still more prevalent in CAD patients (39%) compared with controls (27%). The prevalence of large LDL particles was lower in CAD patients (3%) than in controls (24%). Intermediate LDL particles were the most prevalent in both groups, 49% in CAD patients and 46% in controls. The difference in LDL particle size between CAD patients and controls was not independent but was highly associated (p < 0.0001) with elevated triglyceride levels and decreased high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels. Significantly higher LDL cholesterol levels were found in subjects with intermediate and small LDL particles than in those with large or very small LDL particles. In addition, CAD patients with intermediate or small LDL particles had significantly (p < 0.01) lower HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein A-I levels and higher LDL cholesterol levels than did controls in the same group. Smoking, hypertension, diabetes, and HDL and LDL cholesterol levels were strong discriminators between CAD patients and controls, while triglycerides and LDL particle size did not add significant information to the model. These data indicate that small LDL particle size is not an independent discriminator for CAD after conventional risk factors and lipoprotein parameters such as LDL and HDL cholesterol have been taken into account.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 195
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Racial differences in low density lipoprotein particle size in families with premature coronary heart disease
    Kral, BG
    Blumenthal, RS
    Kwiterovich, PO
    Yook, RM
    Becker, LC
    Becker, DM
    CIRCULATION, 1997, 96 (08) : 3671 - 3671
  • [42] Lipoprotein(a) and LDL particle size are related to the severity of coronary artery disease
    Moon, Jae-Youn
    Kwon, Hyuck Moon
    Kwon, Sung Woo
    Yoon, Se-Jung
    Kim, Jung-Sun
    Lee, Sung-Ju
    Park, Jong Kwan
    Rhee, Ji-Hyuck
    Yoon, Young Won
    Hong, Bum-Kee
    Rim, Se-Joong
    Kim, Hyun Seung
    CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 108 (04) : 282 - 289
  • [43] TARGET LEVELS FOR LOW-DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN IN PATIENTS WITH CORONARY HEART-DISEASE
    RUBINS, HB
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 271 (02): : 100 - 100
  • [44] Lipoprotein particle size and coronary artery calcification
    Wolfe, ML
    Rader, DJ
    Reilly, MP
    ARTERIOSCLEROSIS THROMBOSIS AND VASCULAR BIOLOGY, 2003, 23 (05) : A79 - A79
  • [45] LOW-DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN PARTICLE-SIZE DISTRIBUTION IN THE FRAMINGHAM OFFSPRING CYCLE - RELATION TO PLASMA-LIPOPROTEINS AND DIETARY-FAT INTAKE
    CAMPOS, H
    BLIJLEVENS, E
    MCNAMARA, J
    ORDOVAS, JM
    POSNER, BM
    WILSON, PW
    CASTELLI, WP
    SCHAEFER, EJ
    CIRCULATION, 1992, 86 (04) : 811 - 811
  • [46] Is low density lipoprotein apheresis effective for coronary artery disease?
    Kutsumi, Y
    Tada, H
    Iwamuro, A
    Kabuto, H
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 1998, 44 (05) : M666 - M669
  • [47] Is low density lipoprotein apheresis effective for coronary artery disease?
    Kutsumi, Yasunori
    Tada, Hiroshi
    Iwamuro, Ayumi
    Kabuto, Hiroko
    ASAIO Journal, 44 (05):
  • [48] TRIGLYCERIDE-RICH LOW-DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN - ROLE IN THE HYPERAPOBETALIPOPROTEINEMIA ASSOCIATED WITH CORONARY-ARTERY DISEASE
    CROUSE, JR
    PARKS, JS
    KAHL, FR
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1983, 31 (02): : A383 - A383
  • [49] LOW-DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN INTERACTION WITH ARTERY DERIVED PROTEOGLYCAN - THE INFLUENCE OF LDL PARTICLE-SIZE AND THE RELATIONSHIP TO ATHEROSCLEROSIS SUSCEPTIBILITY
    WAGNER, WD
    EDWARDS, IJ
    STCLAIR, RW
    BARAKAT, H
    ATHEROSCLEROSIS, 1989, 75 (01) : 49 - 59
  • [50] RATIONALE AND DESIGN OF THE DEPARTMENT-OF-VETERANS-AFFAIRS HIGH-DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL INTERVENTION TRIAL (HIT) FOR SECONDARY PREVENTION OF CORONARY-ARTERY DISEASE IN MEN WITH LOW HIGH-DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL AND DESIRABLE LOW-DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL
    RUBINS, HB
    ROBINS, SJ
    IWANE, MK
    BODEN, WE
    ELAM, MB
    FYE, CL
    GORDON, DJ
    SCHAEFER, EJ
    SCHECTMAN, G
    WITTES, JT
    KARVONEN, J
    COLLINS, D
    BARTOZZI, R
    CUSHING, C
    DERRICO, J
    NEWVINE, K
    SATHER, MR
    DRAGO, M
    FETTER, R
    GAGNE, W
    MCNAMARA, JR
    CROW, RS
    SWANSON, C
    SMITH, K
    PEARSON, TA
    GOTTO, AM
    BAILEY, KR
    DAVIS, BR
    PARISI, AF
    RIFKIND, BM
    ZELIS, R
    WILT, TJ
    CROW, R
    DEMOTS, H
    LINARES, E
    RUTAN, G
    LAKSHMAN, R
    KOU, W
    MANCINI, GBJ
    SAMPLE, S
    CHAMPAGNE, N
    CHAPIN, C
    GILROY, D
    AICARDI, N
    PAPP, MA
    STANFORD, S
    MONREAL, S
    WEXLER, LF
    SHAFFER, J
    SNOW, E
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1993, 71 (01): : 45 - 52