MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING FOR REVERSE LOGISTIC CONTRACTOR SELECTION IN E-WASTE RECYCLING INDUSTRY USING POLYTOMOUS RASCH MODEL

被引:0
|
作者
Sabtu, Muhammad Idham [1 ]
Saibani, Nizaroyani [1 ]
Ramli, Rizauddin [1 ]
Ab. Rahman, Mohd Nizam [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Dept Mech & Mat Engn, Bangi, Malaysia
来源
JURNAL TEKNOLOGI | 2015年 / 77卷 / 27期
关键词
Reverse supply chain; reverse logistic; third party logistic; rasch model; e-waste; decision making;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
E-waste recycling is a growing sector in the reverse supply chain and the main purpose of recycling is to recover precious materials making these recycling activities economically interesting. To increase vibrancy of this activity, third party logistic (3PLs) are used to carry out most of the logistic functions that contribute to the competitive advantages. Thus, this study attempts to ascertain the attributes that influence the selection and evaluation of 3PLs the most. Survey based approach were carried out on experts from recycling companies in Malaysia via questionnaire, the results were evaluated using rasch model analysis for evaluating and prioritizing the attributes according to the scores. Previous studies have proposed their multiple dimensions and criterias for selection on 3PLs with different types of industries and methods. The criterias play a vital role in the selection of the best on 3PLs. There are 10 criterias with 38 sub-items were identified and constructed used in screening the best reverse logistic contractor. The results shows that organisation role attribute is the most critical attributes that must be considered. The results of this study are usefull in focusing on several vital attributes for selecting the best 3PLs provider that can intensify total firm performance.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 125
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Development of multi-criteria decision making model for remanufacturing technology portfolio selection
    Jiang, Zhigang
    Zhang, Hua
    Sutherland, John W.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2011, 19 (17-18) : 1939 - 1945
  • [42] Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making to optimise solid waste management
    Garcia-Garcia G.
    Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 2022, 37
  • [43] A Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Employee Selection Using SAW and Profile Matching
    Briscilla, S. Jenifer
    Sundarrajan, R.
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND INTELLIGENT INFORMATICS, 2024, 28 (05) : 1117 - 1125
  • [44] Service selection using fuzzy multi-criteria decision making: a comprehensive review
    Masdari, Mohammad
    Khezri, Hemn
    JOURNAL OF AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE AND HUMANIZED COMPUTING, 2021, 12 (02) : 2803 - 2834
  • [45] Multi-criteria decision making for supplier selection using fuzzy AHP approach
    Yadav, Vinod
    Sharma, Milind Kumar
    BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2015, 22 (06) : 1158 - 1174
  • [46] Selection of straw waste reinforced sustainable polymer composite using a multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Singh, Tej
    Fekete, Imre
    Jakab, Sandor Kalman
    Lendvai, Laszlo
    BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY, 2024, 14 (17) : 21007 - 21017
  • [47] Service selection using fuzzy multi-criteria decision making: a comprehensive review
    Mohammad Masdari
    Hemn Khezri
    Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 2021, 12 : 2803 - 2834
  • [48] Selection of sustainable suppliers in the oil and gas industry using fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Jermsittiparsert, K.
    Zahar, M.
    Sumarni, S.
    Voronkova, O. Y.
    Bakhvalov, S. Y.
    Akhmadeev, R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 12 (04): : 253 - 261
  • [49] An integrated multi-criteria decision-making method for hazardous waste disposal site selection
    Feng, Jianghong
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 24 (06) : 8039 - 8070
  • [50] An integrated multi-criteria decision-making method for hazardous waste disposal site selection
    Jianghong Feng
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2022, 24 : 8039 - 8070