SUPREME-COURT RULING ENDS DISPUTE OVER CO-GENERATION FERC REGULATIONS

被引：0

|

作者：

THOMPSON, B

机构：

来源：

SPECIFYING ENGINEER | 1983年 / 50卷 / 02期

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

TU [建筑科学];

学科分类号：

0813 ;

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：23 / &

相关论文

共 50 条

[41] RIGHT TO FEES OF THE ATTENDING PHYSICIAN IN THE FORESEEABLE HINDRANCE TO CARE PROVISION - RULING OF THE HAMM STATE SUPREME-COURT IN MAY-1994
RIEGER, HJ
DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1994, 119 (44) : 1522 - 1523
[42] DEFERRED COMPENSATION - A CASE-STUDY OF PURPOSEFUL NEGATION OF SUPREME-COURT JURISDICTION OVER INCOME-TAX LAWS
ANSPACH, WN
MARLIN, PL
MULLER, CJ
TAXES-THE TAX MAGAZINE, 1981, 59 (10): : 691 - 711
[43] THE JUDGMENT OF THE GERMAN FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF MARCH 18, 2014. ENDS THE DISPUTE OVER THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE EURO AREA
Barcz, Jan
PRZEGLAD SEJMOWY, 2014, (05): : 91 - 107
[44] RELIGIOUS-LIBERTY IN THE SUPREME-COURT - THE CASES THAT DEFINE THE DEBATE OVER CHURCH AND STATE (VOL 120, PG 113, 1995)
SHAW, S
LIBRARY JOURNAL, 1995, 120 (07) : 99 - 99
[45] FORSTER V RJ-REYNOLDS-TOBACCO-CO - MINNESOTA SUPREME-COURT GIVES THE GREEN LIGHT TO CIGARETTE PLAINTIFFS - COMMENT
BRUELEGRIED, C
MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW, 1990, 74 (04) : 839 - 878
[46] Jurisprudence of other courts Gloss to the ruling of the Supreme Court of April 29, 2010 (Act Call No. IV CO 37/09)
Radziewicz, Piotr
PRZEGLAD SEJMOWY, 2011, (02): : 179 - 193
[47] KOENINGS V JOSEPH-SCHLITZ-BREWING-CO - THE WISCONSIN SUPREME-COURT ADDRESSES EXECUTIVE TERMINATION BENEFITS IN A GOLDEN PARACHUTE CONTRACT
HANRAHAN, AM
WISCONSIN LAW REVIEW, 1987, (05) : 823 - 858
[48] Does ability to save a life still equal a duty to have an AED despite Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision over-ruling Atcovitz?
Gilbert, RR
EXERCISE STANDARDS AND MALPRACTICE REPORTER, 2003, 17 (05): : 75 - 77
[49] The natural over-reach of the parliamentary regulations on representation. Comment of Constitutional Court ruling 141/2007, 18th June
Ortega Santiago, Carlos
REVISTA ESPANOLA DE DERECHO CONSTITUCIONAL, 2008, 28 (82): : 319 - 346
[50] SUPREME-COURT RULING COULD STIFLE OPEN DEBATE IN JOURNALS - EDITORS FEAR THAT A RECENT REDEFINITION OF PROTECTED SPEECH COULD FORCE THEM TO QUASH CONTROVERSY IN ORDER TO AVOID LIBEL LAWSUITS
SEARS, C
SCIENTIST, 1990, 4 (19): : 1 - &

← 1 2 3 4 5 →