CYTOPATHOLOGY OF MALIGNANT MESOTHELIOMA - A STEPWISE LOGISTIC-REGRESSION ANALYSIS

被引:31
|
作者
STEVENS, MW [1 ]
LEONG, ASY [1 ]
FAZZALARI, NL [1 ]
DOWLING, KD [1 ]
HENDERSON, DW [1 ]
机构
[1] INST MED & VET SCI,DIV TISSUE PATHOL,POB 14,RUNDLE MALL,ADELAIDE,SA 5000,AUSTRALIA
关键词
ADENOCARCINOMA; BENIGN MESOTHELIAL PROLIFERATION; CYTOLOGY; LOGISTIC MODEL; SEROUS EFFUSIONS;
D O I
10.1002/dc.2840080405
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Twenty-four cytologic features, previously reported to be useful in the distinction of malignant mesothelioma, adenocarcinoma, and benign mesothelial proliferation in serous effusions were assessed. Forty-four cases of malignant mesotheliomas, 46 cases of metastatic adenocarcinomas, and 30 cases of benign mesothelial proliferations were examined for these parameters. When these cytologic features were subjected to a stepwise logistic regression analysis, five features were selected to distinguish malignant mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma. These were true papillary aggregates, multinucleation with atypia, cell-to-cell apposition, acinus-like structures, and balloon-like vacuolation, the latter two features being characteristic of adenocarcinoma. The four variables selected to distinguish malignant mesothelioma from benign mesothelial proliferations were nuclear pleomorphism, macronucleoli, cell-in-cell engulfment, and monolayer cell groups, the latter being a feature of benign proliferations. Using these selected variables, the logistic model correctly predicted 95.4 % of cases of malignant mesothelioma versus 100% of adenocarcinoma and 100% of malignant mesotheliomas versus 90% of benign mesothelial proliferations. The results of regression analysis suggest that many of the previously described cytologic features are not important diagnostic discriminators.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 341
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] NONMONOTONIC RELATIONSHIPS IN LOGISTIC-REGRESSION
    RHODES, P
    MCGEE, D
    BAUGHMAN, A
    BIOMETRICS, 1985, 41 (01) : 323 - 323
  • [32] RIDGE ESTIMATORS IN LOGISTIC-REGRESSION
    LECESSIE, S
    VANHOUWELINGEN, JC
    APPLIED STATISTICS-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C, 1992, 41 (01): : 191 - 201
  • [33] BEST SUBSETS LOGISTIC-REGRESSION
    HOSMER, DW
    JOVANOVIC, B
    LEMESHOW, S
    BIOMETRICS, 1989, 45 (04) : 1265 - 1270
  • [34] MULTINOMIAL LOGISTIC-REGRESSION ALGORITHM
    BOHNING, D
    ANNALS OF THE INSTITUTE OF STATISTICAL MATHEMATICS, 1992, 44 (01) : 197 - 200
  • [35] AN ALGORITHM FOR EXACT LOGISTIC-REGRESSION
    TRITCHLER, D
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1984, 79 (387) : 709 - 711
  • [36] LOGISTIC-REGRESSION AND MODEL FIT
    WALSH, A
    TEACHING SOCIOLOGY, 1989, 17 (03) : 419 - 420
  • [37] DETERMINING THE MOST VALUABLE CLINICAL-VARIABLES - STEPWISE MULTIPLE LOGISTIC-REGRESSION PROGRAM
    COLES, LS
    BROWN, BW
    ENGELHARD, C
    HALPERN, J
    FRIES, JF
    METHODS OF INFORMATION IN MEDICINE, 1980, 19 (01) : 42 - 49
  • [38] STEPWISE LOGISTIC-REGRESSION - A MODEL FOR PREDICTING SUCCESS OF FEMORAL-POPLITEAL BYPASS GRAFTS
    RAVIOLA, C
    WHEELER, N
    NICHTER, L
    BAKER, J
    MOORE, WS
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIV FUR CHIRURGIE, 1982, 357 (03): : 174 - 174
  • [39] LOGISTIC-REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF EPIDEMIOLOGIC DATA - THEORY AND PRACTICE
    KLEINBAUM, DG
    KUPPER, LL
    CHAMBLESS, LE
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS PART A-THEORY AND METHODS, 1982, 11 (05): : 485 - 547
  • [40] LOGISTIC-REGRESSION - EXPLANATION AND USE
    HALL, GH
    ROUND, AP
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS OF LONDON, 1994, 28 (03): : 242 - 246