HUMERAL STEM LOOSENING FOLLOWING REVERSE SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:34
|
作者
Grey, Ben [1 ,2 ]
Rodseth, Reitze N. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Roche, Stephen J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Groote Schuur Hosp, Princess Alice Unit, Cape Town, South Africa
[2] Univ Cape Town, Groote Schuur Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Shoulder & Elbow Unit,Princess Alice Unit, Cape Town, South Africa
[3] Greys Hosp, Dept Anaesthet, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
[4] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Dept Anaesthet, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
关键词
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.00129
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Aseptic stem loosening following reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is an uncommon complication. The timing and the factors contributing to aseptic stem loosening remain poorly understood. Methods: We performed a systematic review that identified 75 articles; 65 of the included articles were case series (Level-IV evidence), 8 were cohort studies (7 Level III, 1 Level II), and 2 were prospective randomized controlled trials (Level I). A meta-analysis of 1,660 cemented and 805 uncemented RSA stems was performed. We compared the rates of aseptic stem loosening, humeral radiolucent lines, and revision for stem loosening (1) between cemented and uncemented stems in cohorts with short and long mean follow-up periods (<5 and >= 5 years) as well as in all cohorts combined, and (2) among different etiological subgroups. Results: Aseptic stem loosening occurred more commonly in the cohort with long compared with short follow-up time (2% versus 0.8%, p = 0.01). When comparing cemented with uncemented stems, there was no significant difference in the rates of aseptic stem loosening or revision for stem loosening in either the short or long-term follow-up groups. Humeral radiolucent lines were more common with cemented compared with uncemented stems (15.9% versus 9.5%, p = 0.002). Analyzed by etiology, the highest rate of aseptic stem loosening occurred in the tumor subgroup (10.8%), followed by RSA as a revision procedure after a failed arthroplasty (3.7%). No stems in the acute fracture or fracture sequelae subgroups developed aseptic stem loosening. Conclusions: Aseptic stem loosening occurred more commonly in cohorts with longer follow-up. There were no differences in the rates of aseptic stem loosening or revision for stem loosening between cemented and uncemented stems. Patients treated with RSA following excision of proximal humeral tumors and RSA as a revision procedure after a failed arthroplasty were at greater risk of aseptic stem loosening.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Lateralized versus nonlateralized glenospheres in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    Nunes, Bernardo
    Linhares, Daniela
    Costa, Francisca
    Neves, Nuno
    Claro, Rui
    Silva, Manuel Ribeiro
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2021, 30 (07) : 1700 - 1713
  • [22] Symptomatic aseptic loosening of a short humeral stem following anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty
    Zmistowski, Benjamin
    Carpenter, Daniel P.
    Chalmers, Peter N.
    Smith, Matthew J.
    Keener, Jay D.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2021, 30 (12) : 2738 - 2744
  • [23] Hemiarthroplasty versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures: a meta-analysis
    Shukla, Dave R.
    McAnany, Steven
    Kim, Jun
    Overley, Sam
    Parsons, Bradford O.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2016, 25 (02) : 330 - 340
  • [24] Acute versus delayed reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly population: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Torchia, Michael T.
    Austin, Daniel C.
    Cozzolino, Niki
    Jacobowitz, Lauren
    Bell, John-Erik
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2019, 28 (04) : 765 - 773
  • [25] Humeral and Glenoid Version in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review
    Berton, Alessandra
    Longo, Umile Giuseppe
    Gulotta, Lawrence V.
    De Salvatore, Sergio
    Piergentili, Ilaria
    Calabrese, Giovanni
    Roberti, Federica
    Warren, Russell F.
    Denaro, Vincenzo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (24)
  • [26] Outcome and Complications Following Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ravi, V.
    Murphy, R.
    Moverley, R.
    Derias, M.
    Phadnis, J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108
  • [27] Whether the Indications for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Should Continue to Be Expanded? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Li, Huankun
    Bao, Hangsheng
    Yang, Zhidong
    Hu, Baijun
    Pan, Yaocheng
    Wang, Yi
    Chen, Jiayi
    Chen, Hongjun
    Shen, Bisheng
    Zou, Yonggen
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2025, 17 (02) : 313 - 332
  • [28] Risk Factors for Dislocation after Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Loucas, Marios
    Loucas, Rafael
    Vetter, Maximilian
    Ernstbrunner, Lukas
    Borbas, Paul
    Wieser, Karl
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2021, 151 : 45S - 45S
  • [29] The effect of subscapularis repair on dislocation rates in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Matthewson, Graeme
    Kooner, Sahil
    Kwapisz, Adam
    Leiter, Jeff
    Old, Jason
    MacDonald, Peter
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2019, 28 (05) : 989 - 997
  • [30] Management of glenoid bone loss in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wilcox, B.
    Campbell, R. J.
    Low, A.
    Yeoh, T.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2022, 104B (12): : 1334 - 1342