共 33 条
- [21] DISQUALIFYING DISPOSITIONS OF INCENTIVE STOCK-OPTIONS - TAX BENEFITS VERSUS FINANCIAL-REPORTING COSTSJOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 1992, 30 : 37 - 68MATSUNAGA, SSHEVLIN, TSHORES, D
- [22] INCENTIVE STOCK-OPTIONS AFTER TRA 86 - NEW OPPORTUNITIES FOR LONG-TERM BENEFITSTAXES, 1988, 66 (03): : 207 - 212LAVELLE, JHWELSH, JJ
- [23] EXECUTIVE-COMPENSATION REVISITED - INCENTIVE COMPENSATION AND STOCK-OPTIONS PLAY AN INCREASINGLY IMPORTANT ROLETAXES, 1982, 60 (12): : 863 - 875SOLLEE, WL
- [25] QUALIFIED STOCK-OPTIONS - SOME DEVELOPING PROBLEMS UNDER THE 1964 REVENUE ACTJOURNAL OF TAXATION, 1964, 21 (03): : 140 - 142RUBENFELD, SI
- [26] INCENTIVE STOCK-OPTIONS AND OTHER BUSINESS RELATED PROVISIONS OF THE ECONOMIC-RECOVERY TAX ACT OF 1981ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1982, 183 (MAR): : 12 - SCHBCHULICK, R
- [27] PROPOSED REGULATIONS PROVIDE SOME CLARIFICATION IN COMPUTING THE ACE ADJUSTMENTJOURNAL OF TAXATION, 1990, 73 (03): : 150 - 156STARR, SPGREEN, DC
- [28] Proposed regulations on noncompensatory partnership options: No gain, some painJOURNAL OF TAXATION, 2003, 98 (04): : 197 - 225Carman, PBanoff, SI
- [29] STOCK-OPTIONS DONT WORK - IF CEOS WANT SHARES, LET EM BUY SOMEFORTUNE, 1995, 132 (06) : 230 - 232MONKS, RAG
- [30] PROFESSIONAL-ASSOCIATIONS AND THE KINTNER REGULATIONS - SOME ANSWERS, MORE QUESTIONS, AND FURTHER COMMENTSTAX LAW REVIEW, 1962, 17 (04): : 469 - 489GRAYCK, MD