Safety and Pharmacokinetics ofMotesanib in Combination with Panitumumab and Gemcitabine-Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced Cancer

被引:3
|
作者
Burris, Howard [1 ]
Stephenson, Joe [2 ]
Otterson, Gregory A. [3 ]
Stein, Mark [4 ]
McGreivy, Jesse [5 ]
Sun, Yu-Nien [5 ]
Ingram, Megan [6 ]
Ye, Yining [6 ]
Schwartzberg, Lee S. [7 ]
机构
[1] Sarah Cannon Res Inst, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
[2] Canc Ctr Carolinas, Greenville, SC 29605 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[4] UMDNJ, Robert Wood Johnson Univ Hosp, New Brunswick, NJ 08903 USA
[5] Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 USA
[6] Amgen Inc, San Francisco, CA 94080 USA
[7] West Clin, Memphis, TN 38120 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1155/2011/853931
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and tolerability of motesanib (an orally administered small-molecule antagonist of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1, 2, and 3, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and Kit) when administered in combination with panitumumab, gemcitabine, and cisplatin. Methods. This was an open-label, multicenter phase 1b study in patients with advanced solid tumors with an ECOG performance status = 1 and for whom a gemcitabine/cisplatin regimen was indicated. Patients received motesanib (0 mg [control], 50mg once daily [QD], 75mg QD, 100 mg QD, 125 mg QD, or 75 mg twice daily [BID]) with panitumumab (9 mg/kg), gemcitabine (1250 mg/m2) and cisplatin (75mg/m2) in 21-day cycles. The primary endpoint was the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Results. Forty-one patients were enrolled and received treatment (including 8 control patients). One of eight patients in the 50mg QD cohort and 5/11 patients in the 125 mg QD cohort experienced DLTs. The maximum tolerated dose was established as 100 mg QD. Among patients who received motesanib (n = 33), 29 had motesanib-related adverse events. Fourteen patients had serious motesanib-related events. Ten patients had motesanib-related venous thromboembolic events and three had motesanib-related arterial thromboembolic events, two of which were considered serious. One patient had a complete response and nine had partial responses as their best objective response. Conclusions. The combination of motesanib, panitumumab, and gemcitabine/cisplatin could not be administered consistently and, at the described doses and schedule, may be intolerable. However, encouraging antitumor activity was noted in some cases.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Genomic and transcriptomic biomarkers of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine-cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer
    Woo, Seonjeong
    Kang, Beodeul
    Lee, Sung Hwan
    Kim, Jung Sun
    Kang, Haeyoun
    Yang, Seok Jeong
    An, Chansik
    Kim, Gwangil
    Hwang, Sohyun
    Kim, Chan
    Chon, Hong Jae
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (16)
  • [22] Gemcitabine and cisplatin is a highly effective combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced cancer of the gallbladder
    Malik, IA
    Aziz, Z
    Zaidi, SHM
    Sethuraman, G
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2003, 26 (02): : 174 - 177
  • [23] Safety and pharmacokinetics of panitumumab in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors
    Toshihiko Doi
    Atsushi Ohtsu
    Makoto Tahara
    Tomohide Tamura
    Kuniaki Shirao
    Yasuhide Yamada
    Satoru Otani
    Bing-Bing Yang
    Masayuki Ohkura
    Tomoko Ohtsu
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2009, 14 : 307 - 314
  • [24] Safety and activity of masitinib in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer
    Emmanuel Mitry
    Pascal Hammel
    Gaël Deplanque
    Françoise Mornex
    Philippe Levy
    Jean-François Seitz
    Alain Moussy
    Jean-Pierre Kinet
    Olivier Hermine
    Philippe Rougier
    Eric Raymond
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2010, 66 : 395 - 403
  • [25] Safety and activity of masitinib in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer
    Mitry, Emmanuel
    Hammel, Pascal
    Deplanque, Gael
    Mornex, Francoise
    Levy, Philippe
    Seitz, Jean-Francois
    Moussy, Alain
    Kinet, Jean-Pierre
    Hermine, Olivier
    Rougier, Philippe
    Raymond, Eric
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2010, 66 (02) : 395 - 403
  • [26] Folfirinox versus gemcitabine-cisplatin combination as first-line therapy in treatment of pancreaticobiliary cancer
    Kayahan, Neslihan
    Karaca, Mustafa
    Satis, Hasan
    Yapar, Dilek
    Ozet, Ahmet
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 51 (04) : 1727 - 1732
  • [27] A cost minimisation analysis of navelbine-cisplatin versus gemcitabine-cisplatin in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer in Poland
    Skowron, A.
    Polak, S.
    Brandys, J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2006, 9 (06) : A285 - A285
  • [28] SAFETY AND EFFICACY GEMCITABINE-CISPLATIN SPLIT DOSE AS A NEOADUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY FOR MUSCLE INVASIVE BLADDER CANCER
    Abdelhafez, Mohamed
    Williams, Michael
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E1194 - E1194
  • [29] Safety and efficacy of gemcitabine plus cisplatin combination in pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients
    Oliveira Brito, Luiz Gustavo
    de Andrade, Jurandyr Moreira
    Lins-Almeida, Thiago
    Zola, Fabio Eduardo
    Pinheiro, Mariana Novaes
    Cosiski Marana, Heitor Ricardo
    Tiezzi, Daniel Guimaraes
    Peria, Fernanda Maris
    MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 29 (01) : 33 - 38
  • [30] Safety and efficacy of gemcitabine plus cisplatin combination in pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients
    Luiz Gustavo Oliveira Brito
    Jurandyr Moreira de Andrade
    Thiago Lins-Almeida
    Fábio Eduardo Zola
    Mariana Novaes Pinheiro
    Heitor Ricardo Cosiski Marana
    Daniel Guimarães Tiezzi
    Fernanda Maris Peria
    Medical Oncology, 2012, 29 : 33 - 38