Safety and Pharmacokinetics ofMotesanib in Combination with Panitumumab and Gemcitabine-Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced Cancer

被引:3
|
作者
Burris, Howard [1 ]
Stephenson, Joe [2 ]
Otterson, Gregory A. [3 ]
Stein, Mark [4 ]
McGreivy, Jesse [5 ]
Sun, Yu-Nien [5 ]
Ingram, Megan [6 ]
Ye, Yining [6 ]
Schwartzberg, Lee S. [7 ]
机构
[1] Sarah Cannon Res Inst, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
[2] Canc Ctr Carolinas, Greenville, SC 29605 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[4] UMDNJ, Robert Wood Johnson Univ Hosp, New Brunswick, NJ 08903 USA
[5] Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 USA
[6] Amgen Inc, San Francisco, CA 94080 USA
[7] West Clin, Memphis, TN 38120 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1155/2011/853931
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and tolerability of motesanib (an orally administered small-molecule antagonist of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1, 2, and 3, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and Kit) when administered in combination with panitumumab, gemcitabine, and cisplatin. Methods. This was an open-label, multicenter phase 1b study in patients with advanced solid tumors with an ECOG performance status = 1 and for whom a gemcitabine/cisplatin regimen was indicated. Patients received motesanib (0 mg [control], 50mg once daily [QD], 75mg QD, 100 mg QD, 125 mg QD, or 75 mg twice daily [BID]) with panitumumab (9 mg/kg), gemcitabine (1250 mg/m2) and cisplatin (75mg/m2) in 21-day cycles. The primary endpoint was the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Results. Forty-one patients were enrolled and received treatment (including 8 control patients). One of eight patients in the 50mg QD cohort and 5/11 patients in the 125 mg QD cohort experienced DLTs. The maximum tolerated dose was established as 100 mg QD. Among patients who received motesanib (n = 33), 29 had motesanib-related adverse events. Fourteen patients had serious motesanib-related events. Ten patients had motesanib-related venous thromboembolic events and three had motesanib-related arterial thromboembolic events, two of which were considered serious. One patient had a complete response and nine had partial responses as their best objective response. Conclusions. The combination of motesanib, panitumumab, and gemcitabine/cisplatin could not be administered consistently and, at the described doses and schedule, may be intolerable. However, encouraging antitumor activity was noted in some cases.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of AMG 706 in combination with panitumumab and gemcitabine-cisplatin in patients (pts) with advanced cancer
    Crawford, J.
    Burris, H.
    Stephenson, J., Jr.
    Otterson, G.
    Stein, M.
    McGreivy, J.
    Sun, Y.
    Ingram, M.
    Yang, L.
    Schwartzberg, L. S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (18)
  • [2] Pembrolizumab in combination with first-line chemotherapy with gemcitabine-cisplatin for advanced biliary tract cancer
    d'Abrigeon, Constance
    Cindy, Neuzillet
    BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2024, 111 (06) : 541 - 542
  • [3] Comparison of the Efficacy between Gemcitabine-Cisplatin and Capecitabine-Cisplatin Combination Chemotherapy for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer
    Lee, Jieun
    Hong, Tae Ho
    Lee, In Seok
    You, Young Kyoung
    Lee, Myung Ah
    CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2015, 47 (02): : 259 - 265
  • [4] Phase 1 dose escalation study of copanlisib (BAY 80-6946) in combination with gemcitabine or gemcitabine-cisplatin in advanced cancer patients.
    Kim, Richard D.
    Alberts, Steven R.
    Renshaw, Frank Gary
    Genvresse, Isabelle
    Reif, Stefanie
    Kaplan, Jennifer
    Grilley-Olson, Juneko E.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (15)
  • [5] Treatment of advanced gallbladder cancer with gemcitabine (gem) or gemcitabine-cisplatin (gem-cispl)
    Jorge, G.
    Betzabe, R.
    Olga, B.
    Luis, V.
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2005, 3 (02): : 220 - 220
  • [6] Phase I study of gemcitabine-cisplatin versus pemetrexed-cisplatin for patients with advanced or metastatic bladder cancer
    Cao, Yifang
    He, Yi
    Chen, Hao
    He, Shunliang
    Gu, Yanqin
    Wang, Xueping
    Chen, Bin
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2018, 23 (02): : 475 - 481
  • [7] Toxicity profile of the gemcitabine-cisplatin in elderly patients with bladder cancer
    Gomes, FMR
    Marques, AMS
    Costa, FAO
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, : 364 - 364
  • [8] Comparison of Vinorelbine-Cisplatin with Gemcitabine-Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Ozkaya, Sevket
    Findik, Serhat
    Uzun, Oguz
    Atici, Atilla Guven
    Erkan, Levent
    CLINICAL MEDICINE INSIGHTS-CIRCULATORY RESPIRATORY AND PULMONARY MEDICINE, 2008, 2
  • [9] Gemcitabine or gemcitabine-cisplatin in advanced multiple myeloma: An ongoing study.
    Offidani, M
    Mele, A
    Corvatta, L
    Rupoli, S
    Olivieri, A
    Malerba, L
    Marconi, M
    Alesiani, F
    Leoni, P
    BLOOD, 2000, 96 (11) : 291B - 291B
  • [10] Magrolimab and gemcitabine-cisplatin combination enhance phagocytic elimination of bladder cancer.
    Kiss, Bernhard
    Volkmer, Anne Kathrin
    Feng, Dongdong
    McKenna, Kelly Marie
    Mihardja, Shirley
    Chao, Mark
    Takimoto, Chris H. M.
    Liao, Joseph C.
    Volkmer, Jens-Peter
    Weissman, Irving L.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (15)