A Comparative Analysis of Indigenous Research Guidelines to Inform Genomic Research in Indigenous Communities

被引:19
|
作者
Taniguchi, Nicole K. [1 ]
Taualii, Maile [1 ]
Maddock, Jay [2 ]
机构
[1] Papa Ola Lokahi, Native Hawaiian Epidemiol Ctr, Honolulu, HI 96813 USA
[2] Univ Hawaii, Off Publ Hlth Studies, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
genetic research; genomic research; Indigenous communities;
D O I
10.18584/iipj.2012.3.1.6
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Genetic research has potential benefits for improving health, such as identifying molecular characteristics of a disease, understanding disease prevalence and treatment, and developing treatments tailored to patients based on individual genetic characteristics of their disease. Indigenous people are often targeted for genetic research because genes are easier to study in communities that practice endogamy. Therefore, populations perceived to be more homogenous, such as Indigenous peoples, are ideal for genetic studies. While Indigenous communities remain the focal point of many genomic studies, some result in harm and unethical practice. Unfortunately, the harms of poorly formulated and unethical research involving Indigenous people have created barriers to participation that prevent critical and lifesaving research. These harms have led a number of Indigenous communities to develop guidelines for engaging with researchers to assist in safely bridging the gap between genetic research and Indigenous peoples. SPECIFIC AIMS: The specific aims of this study were: (1) to conduct an international review and comparison of Indigenous research guidelines that highlight topics regarding genetics and use of biological samples and identify commonalities and differences among ethical principles of concern to Indigenous peoples; and (2) develop policy recommendations for Indigenous populations interested in creating formal policies around the use of genetic information and protection of biological samples using data from specific aim 1. METHODS: A comparative analysis was performed to identify best research practices and recommendations for Indigenous groups from four countries: Canada, New Zealand, Australia, and the United States. The analysis examined commonalities in political relationships, which support self-determination among these Indigenous communities to control their data. Current international Indigenous guidelines were analyzed to review processes of how genetic research is conducted and the use of biological samples is handled with Indigenous peoples. RESULTS: Results suggest the need for genetic and genomic research policies for the world's Indigenous people. Indigenous groups are most vulnerable to research exploitation and harm; therefore, identifying principles that work for Indigenous people will lead to best practices for all populations. CONCLUSIONS: Development and implementation of best practices informed by research guidelines in Canada, New Zealand, Australia, and the U.S. may be helpful to advise Indigenous leaders, policy makers, and researchers to the proper conduction of genetic research within Indigenous communities. Comparative analyses are a useful tool for identifying areas for further work in developing genetic research policy for Indigenous communities. OUTCOME: The outcomes of this analysis are relevant and useful to Indigenous communities and inform the development of community-based genetic research guidelines. The recommendations can be used in designing appropriate policies for future genomic research with Indigenous peoples.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Data sharing in Indigenous health research: guidelines needed
    Wang, Zhiqiang
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2015, 203 (01) : 12 - +
  • [32] Seeking consent for research with indigenous communities: a systematic review
    Fitzpatrick, Emily F. M.
    Martiniuk, Alexandra L. C.
    D'Antoine, Heather
    Oscar, June
    Carter, Maureen
    Elliott, Elizabeth J.
    BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2016, 17
  • [33] The use of realist approaches for health research in Indigenous communities
    Bergeron, Dave A.
    Tremblay, Marie-Claude
    Dogba, Maman Joyce
    Martin, Debbie
    McGavock, Jonathan
    ALTERNATIVE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES, 2021, 17 (01) : 106 - 110
  • [34] Trust Development in Research with Indigenous Communities in the United States
    Burnette, Catherine E.
    Sanders, Sara
    QUALITATIVE REPORT, 2014, 19 (22)
  • [35] The Imperative for Research to Promote Health Equity in Indigenous Communities
    Stanley, Linda R.
    Swaim, Randall C.
    Kaholokula, Joseph Keawe'aimoku
    Kelly, Kathleen J.
    Belcourt, Annie
    Allen, James
    PREVENTION SCIENCE, 2020, 21 (Suppl 1) : S13 - S21
  • [36] Humanistic Research in Latin America: Experiences with Indigenous Communities
    Leal Rodrigues, Deborah
    Vega Garcia, Heidy
    REVISTA COMUNICACION, 2014, 23 (02): : 4 - 14
  • [37] Principles Relevant to Health Research among Indigenous Communities
    O'Donahoo, Francis J.
    Ross, Kirstin E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 12 (05): : 5304 - 5309
  • [38] A framework to guide future farming research with Indigenous communities
    Hayden, Daniel
    Hayden, Amber
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SYSTEMS AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, 2025, 14 (01) : 59 - 73
  • [39] Applying Indigenous Research Methods: Storying with Peoples and Communities
    Bhakat, Sujan
    SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH ONLINE, 2022, 27 (03): : 790 - 792
  • [40] The Imperative for Research to Promote Health Equity in Indigenous Communities
    Linda R. Stanley
    Randall C. Swaim
    Joseph Keawe’aimoku Kaholokula
    Kathleen J. Kelly
    Annie Belcourt
    James Allen
    Prevention Science, 2020, 21 : 13 - 21