Approaches to auditing standards and their possible impact on auditor behavior

被引:11
|
作者
Burns, Jennifer [1 ]
Fogarty, John [2 ]
机构
[1] Deloitte LLP, New York, NY USA
[2] Deloitte & Touche LLP, New York, NY USA
关键词
audit; quality; standards; IAASB; ASB; PCAOB;
D O I
10.1057/jdg.2010.21
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The development and existence of appropriate, high quality auditing standards is the first step in the road to quality audits. Auditing standards serve several important purposes including defining what an audit is, promoting consistency, facilitating education, providing a means to judge performance, and, most of all, influencing auditor behavior. Standards also affect many of the other factors that impact auditor behavior such as inspections, enforcement and firm methodologies. Effective audit standards take account of the complex environment that influences auditor behavior and are designed to promote the sound exercise of professional judgment. However, standard setters take different approaches to the development of standards and significant issues related to the role of judgment and to the level of prescription in the auditing standards remain. Audit standard setters have different views of the interplay between the role of standards and how they influence auditor behavior, and this influences the emphasis of the standards themselves. This article discusses the role of audit standards, various approaches used by current standard setters, the advantages and disadvantages of different approaches, and how such approaches may impact audit quality over time. The insights provided are based on professional experience and participation in the standard-setting process. Those involved in activities related to financial reporting, auditing and standard-setting will be interested in reading this article.
引用
收藏
页码:310 / 319
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MUNICIPAL AUDITING STANDARDS
    Beights, David Miers
    ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 1955, 30 (03): : 421 - 427
  • [32] AUDITING STANDARDS AND THE LAW
    BERRYMAN, RG
    ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 1960, 35 (01): : 70 - 80
  • [33] Privacy Auditing Standards
    Toy, Alan
    Hay, David C.
    AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2015, 34 (03): : 181 - 199
  • [34] UNIFORMITY OF AUDITING STANDARDS
    WARREN, CS
    JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 1975, 13 (01) : 162 - 176
  • [35] AUDITING STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES
    Blough, Carman G.
    ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 1949, 24 (03): : 265 - 271
  • [36] THE MEANING OF AUDITING STANDARDS
    BARDEN, HG
    JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTANCY, 1958, 105 (04): : 50 - 56
  • [37] Standards of Innovation in Auditing
    Curtis, Emer
    Humphrey, Christopher
    Turley, W. Stuart
    AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2016, 35 (03): : 75 - 98
  • [38] ENVIRONMENTAL AUDITING STANDARDS
    PRATT, MS
    CHEMISTRY & INDUSTRY, 1993, (19) : 770 - 770
  • [39] Comments by the Auditing Standards Committee of the Auditing Section of the American Accounting Association on the IAASB Proposal: Improving the Auditor's Report Participating Committee Members and Other Contributors
    chen, Long
    Jones, Keith L.
    Lisic, Ling Lei
    Michas, Paul
    Pawlewicz, Robert
    Pevzner, Mikhail B.
    CURRENT ISSUES IN AUDITING, 2013, 7 (01): : C11 - C20
  • [40] Auditor Lobbying on Accounting Standards
    Allen, Abigail
    Ramanna, Karthik
    Roychowdhury, Sugata
    JOURNAL OF LAW FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING, 2018, 3 (02): : 291 - 331