Remote Monitoring for Implantable Defibrillators: A Nationwide Survey in Italy

被引:9
|
作者
Luzi, Mario [1 ]
De Simone, Antonio [2 ]
Leoni, Loira [3 ]
Amellone, Claudia [4 ]
Pisano, Ennio [5 ]
Favale, Stefano [6 ]
Iacoviello, Massimo [6 ]
Luise, Raffaele [7 ]
Bongiorni, Maria Grazia [8 ]
Stabile, Giuseppe [9 ]
La Rocca, Vincenzo [2 ]
Folino, Franco [3 ]
Capucci, Alessandro [1 ]
D'Onofrio, Antonio [10 ]
Accardi, Francesco [11 ]
Valsecchi, Sergio [11 ]
Buia, Gianfranco [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ospedali Riuniti, Azienda Osped, Cardiol Clin, Via Conca,71, I-60126 Ancona, Italy
[2] Clin San Michele, Maddaloni, Italy
[3] Univ Padua, Azienda Osped, Padua, Italy
[4] Osped Civile Cirie, Cirie, Italy
[5] Vito Fazzi Hosp, Lecce, Italy
[6] Univ Bari, Bari, Italy
[7] Osped San Salvatore, Coppito, Italy
[8] Univ Hosp Pisa, Pisa, Italy
[9] Clin Mediterranea, Naples, Italy
[10] Azienda Osped Colli Monaldi, Naples, Italy
[11] Boston Sci, Milan, Italy
来源
关键词
implantable defibrillator; remote monitoring; follow-up;
D O I
10.2196/ijmr.2824
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Remote monitoring (RM) permits home interrogation of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and provides an alternative option to frequent in-person visits. Objective: The Italia-RM survey aimed to investigate the current practice of ICD follow-up in Italy and to evaluate the adoption and routine use of RM. Methods: An ad hoc questionnaire on RM adoption and resource use during in-clinic and remote follow-up sessions was completed in 206 Italian implanting centers. Results: The frequency of routine in-clinic ICD visits was 2 per year in 158/206 (76.7%) centers, 3 per year in 37/206 (18.0%) centers, and 4 per year in 10/206 (4.9%) centers. Follow-up examinations were performed by a cardiologist in 203/206 (98.5%) centers, and by more than one health care worker in 184/206 (89.3%) centers. There were 137/206 (66.5%) responding centers that had already adopted an RM system, the proportion of ICD patients remotely monitored being 15% for single-and dual-chamber ICD and 20% for cardiac resynchronization therapy ICD. Remote ICD interrogations were scheduled every 3 months, and were performed by a cardiologist in 124/137 (90.5%) centers. After the adoption of RM, the mean time between in-clinic visits increased from 5 (SD 1) to 8 (SD 3) months (P<.001). Conclusions: In current clinical practice, in-clinic ICD follow-up visits consume a large amount of health care resources. The results of this survey show that RM has only partially been adopted in Italy and, although many centers have begun to implement RM in their clinical practice, the majority of their patients continue to be routinely followed-up by means of in-clinic visits.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 89
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reply to: Clinical utility of remote monitoring using multiparametric implantable defibrillators algorithm
    Guerra, Federico
    Stronati, Giulia
    Campari, Monica
    Valsecchi, Sergio
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 46 (02) : 236 - 237
  • [22] Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: Aligning patient preferences and provider recommendations
    Rosman, Lindsey
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 42 (02): : 130 - 131
  • [23] Patient and Provider Perspectives on Remote Monitoring of Pacemakers and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators
    Fraiche, Ariane M.
    Matlock, Daniel D.
    Gabriel, Wilanda
    Rapley, Faith-Anne
    Kramer, Daniel B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 149 : 42 - 46
  • [24] Is it feasible to outsource the remote monitoring of implantable cardiac defibrillators in a large tertiary hospital?
    Lapage, Liesbeth
    Foulon, Stefaan
    Poels, Patricia
    Hoekman, Boukje
    Vermeulen, Jonas
    Dorrestijn, Axel
    Ector, Joris
    Haemers, Peter
    Voros, Gabor
    Garweg, Christophe
    Willems, Rik
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA, 2023, 78 (06) : 687 - 698
  • [25] Patient perspective and safety of remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in the Polish Nationwide Multicenter Registry: the Medtronic CareLink network evaluation
    Maciag, Aleksander
    Mitkowski, Przemyslaw
    Mazurek, Michal
    Kazmierczak, Jaroslaw
    Nowak, Krzysztof
    Grabowski, Marcin
    Oreziak, Artur
    Kempa, Maciej
    Bacior, Bogumila
    Gepner, Katarzyna
    Chmielewska-Michalak, Lidia
    Lenarczyk, Radoslaw
    Kiedrowicz, Radoslaw
    Fuglewicz, Artur
    Cacko, Andrzej
    Szwed, Hanna
    KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2020, 78 (11) : 1115 - 1121
  • [26] Heart failure monitoring with implantable defibrillators
    Kirchner, J.
    Arnold, M.
    Beckendorf, C.
    Paule, S.
    Czygan, G.
    BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING-BIOMEDIZINISCHE TECHNIK, 2012, 57 : 1079 - +
  • [27] Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators Problems and implications using a telemonitoring system
    Siebermair, J.
    Clauss, S.
    Martens, E.
    Schuessler, F.
    Oversohl, N.
    Haserueck, N.
    Estner, H. L.
    Kaeaeb, S.
    Wakili, R.
    HERZ, 2015, 40 : 110 - 118
  • [28] Perception of remote monitoring in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in the Czech Republic environment
    Safarikova, I.
    Bulava, A.
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA, 2017, 72 (05) : 589 - 589
  • [29] Advances in remote monitoring of implantable pacemakers, cardioverter defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy systems
    Werner Jung
    Andreas Rillig
    Ralf Birkemeyer
    Tomislav Miljak
    Udo Meyerfeldt
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2008, 23 : 73 - 85
  • [30] Importance of education in the care of patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators with the possibility of remote monitoring
    Safarikova, I.
    Bulava, A.
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA, 2022, 77 : 5 - 5