Understanding Critically Ill Patients Hemodynamic Response to Mobilization Using the Evidence to Make It Safe and Feasible

被引:24
|
作者
Vollman, Kathleen M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Adv Nursing LLC, 17139 Victor Dr, Northville, MI 48168 USA
关键词
critical care; culture; early mobility; hemodynamic instability; immobility; mobilization;
D O I
10.1097/CNQ.0b013e3182750767
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
In today's critical care environment, we face a difficult but essential task. We must provide comprehensive, compassionate, complex, technological care without causing harm to our patients. To foster a patient-safe environment, we must examine care practices and processes to reduce the chance of error. Successful early mobilization of critically ill patients can reduce several complications including atelectasis and ventilator-associated pneumonia and shorten ventilator time along with cognitive and functional limitations that linger 1 to 5 years after discharge from the intensive care unit. A long-standing challenge to successful mobilization of critically ill patients is the safety concern of hemodynamic instability. An in-depth exploration of what happens to a critically ill patient physiology during mobilization was done to foster a better understanding of strategies that promote adaptation. The article examines the evidence supporting the need to assess readiness for mobilization to reduce the risk of adverse events. Evidence-based tools and techniques to help clinicians prevent hemodynamic instability before, during, and after in-bed or out-of-bed mobilization are discussed. With safety serving as the overriding goal, we can overcome the barriers and succeed in creating and sustaining a culture of early progressive mobility programs within the intensive care unit.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 27
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Hemodynamic and metabolic therapy in critically ill patients.
    Evans, TW
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 345 (19): : 1417 - 1418
  • [32] Hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients in paediatric ICU
    Abdelgawad, Tarek Ahmed
    Magdy, Sondos Mohamed
    Nassef, Marwa Waheed Abd Elhady
    Ebrahim, Beshoy Attaallah
    MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 25 (109) : 696 - 704
  • [33] Early Hemodynamic Management of Critically Ill Burn Patients
    Soussi, Sabri
    Depret, Francois
    Benyamina, Mourad
    Legrand, Matthieu
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2018, 129 (03) : 583 - 589
  • [34] Evolving concepts of hemodynamic monitoring for critically ill patients
    Hamzaoui, Olfa
    Monnet, Xavier
    Teboul, Jean-Louis
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 19 (04) : 220 - 226
  • [35] Less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients
    Jean-Louis Teboul
    Bernd Saugel
    Maurizio Cecconi
    Daniel De Backer
    Christoph K. Hofer
    Xavier Monnet
    Azriel Perel
    Michael R. Pinsky
    Daniel A. Reuter
    Andrew Rhodes
    Pierre Squara
    Jean-Louis Vincent
    Thomas W. Scheeren
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2016, 42 : 1350 - 1359
  • [36] HEMODYNAMIC-EFFECTS OF FENTANYL IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS
    EURIN, B
    ROUBY, JJ
    GLASER, P
    GUESDE, R
    GUILLOSSON, JJ
    VIARS, P
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1980, 8 (04) : 241 - 241
  • [37] HEMODYNAMIC ASSESSMENT OF POOR RISK AND CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS
    COLLINS, FB
    KRAMER, SG
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1971, 122 (04): : 560 - &
  • [38] Predicting adverse hemodynamic events in critically ill patients
    Yoon, Joo H.
    Pinsky, Michael R.
    CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE, 2018, 24 (03) : 196 - 203
  • [39] HEMODYNAMIC PROFILES OF SHOCK IN CRITICALLY ILL COVID PATIENTS
    Hollenberg, Steven M.
    Safi, Lucy
    Parrillo, Joseph
    Fata, Matthew
    Gayed, Noha
    Glotzer, Taya
    Go, Ronaldo
    Gourna-Paleoudis, Elli
    Landers, David
    Jamal, Sameer
    Klinkhammer, Brent
    Shah, Neel
    Shah, Roshan
    Tancredi, Jana
    Turi, Zoltan
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 77 (18) : 3135 - 3135
  • [40] Less or more hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients
    Jozwiak, Mathieu
    Monnet, Xavier
    Teboul, Jean-Louis
    CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE, 2018, 24 (04) : 309 - 315