Quality of life after intensity-modulated radiation therapy for anal cancer

被引:4
|
作者
Tang, Yu [1 ,2 ]
Crane, Christopher H. [3 ]
Eng, Cathy [4 ]
Minsky, Bruce D. [3 ]
Delclos, Marc E. [3 ]
Krishnan, Sunil [3 ]
Malatek, Daniel [3 ]
Gould, Morris S. [3 ]
Das, Prajnan [3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Canc Hosp, Peking Union Med Coll, Dept Radiat Oncol, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, 1515 Holcombe Blvd,Unit 97, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gastrointestinal Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Anal cancer; Quality of life; Radiotherapy; Long-term effects;
D O I
10.1007/s13566-015-0209-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate quality of life after intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for anal cancer. Methods Between 2007 and 2011, 63 patients with anal cancer were treated with IMRT and concurrent chemotherapy, and achieved complete response. These patients completed Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) and Medical Outcomes Study Sexual Problems Scale (MOS-SPS) questionnaires during follow-up visits. Results Thirty-four patients (54 %) answered at least one questionnaire. Among them, the median radiation dose was 54 Gy to the tumor and 45 Gy to the pelvis. The median interval between treatment and the latest questionnaire was 33 months. On the latest questionnaires, the median total FACT-C score was 111, out of maximum (best possible) score 136. The median scores on the Physical, Social/Family, Emotional Functional, and Colorectal subscales were 24, 24, 19, 21, and 21, out of maximum (best possible) scores 28, 28, 24, 28 and 28, respectively. The median score on the MOS Sexual Problems Scale was 62, out of maximum (worst possible) score 100. Patients with lymph node involvement reported worse total FACT-C scores (p = 0.048), as well as worse Social/Family (p = 0.026) and Emotional (p = 0.032) subscale scores. A history of depression/anxiety was significantly associated with worse Physical (p = 0.034) and Emotional (p = 0.003) subscale scores. The use of vaginal dilator during treatment significantly improved Social/Family subscale scores (p = 0.031). Conclusion Overall quality of life scores were acceptable, but sexual functioning scores were suboptimal after IMRT for anal cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 298
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Health-related quality-of-life after external beam radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus conformal radiation therapy
    Yoshimura, K.
    Kamoto, T.
    Nakamura, E.
    Segawa, T.
    Kamba, T.
    Takahashi, T.
    Nishiyama, H.
    Ito, N.
    Takayama, K.
    Mizowaki, T.
    Mitsumori, M.
    Hiraoka, M.
    Ogawa, O.
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2007, 10 (03) : 288 - 292
  • [42] A Survey of Quality Assurance in Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy in Japan
    Nakamura, M.
    Ono, T.
    Akimoto, M.
    Mukumoto, N.
    Ishihara, Y.
    Utsunomiya, S.
    Shiinoki, T.
    Miyabe, Y.
    Sato, S.
    Monzen, H.
    Hiraoka, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [43] Differences In Quality Of Live In Patients With Anal Cancer Treated With Either Intensity-Modulated Or 3D-Conformal Radiation Therapy
    Dapper, H.
    Sauter, C.
    Muench, S.
    Combs, S. E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (03): : E651 - E651
  • [44] Toward automated quality assurance for intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Low, DA
    Dempsey, JF
    Markman, J
    Mutic, S
    Klein, EE
    Sohn, JW
    Purdy, JA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 53 (02): : 443 - 452
  • [45] Posttreatment Quality-of-Life Assessment in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Treated With Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy
    O'Neill, Michael
    Heron, Dwight E.
    Flickinger, John C.
    Smith, Ryan
    Ferris, Robert L.
    Gibson, Michael
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2011, 34 (05): : 478 - 482
  • [46] Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Versus Conventional Radiation Therapy for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anal Canal
    Bazan, Jose G.
    Hara, Wendy
    Hsu, Annie
    Kunz, Pamela A.
    Ford, James
    Fisher, George A.
    Welton, Mark L.
    Shelton, Andrew
    Kapp, Daniel S.
    Koong, Albert C.
    Goodman, Karyn A.
    Chang, Daniel T.
    CANCER, 2011, 117 (15) : 3342 - 3351
  • [47] Pelvic Insufficiency Fracture Incidence in Patients Treated With Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Gynecological or Anal Cancer
    Bazire, L.
    Kirova, Y. M.
    Xu, H. P.
    Foy, J. P.
    Malhaire, C.
    Cao, K. I.
    de la Rochefordiere, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 99 (02): : E298 - E298
  • [48] Commentary - Intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Goffman, TE
    Glatstein, E
    RADIATION RESEARCH, 2002, 158 (01) : 115 - 117
  • [49] Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy - Foreword
    Johnstone, PAS
    CURRENT PROBLEMS IN CANCER, 2004, 28 (02) : 46 - 46
  • [50] Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy and Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy-2 Effective Treatment Modalities for Nasopharyngeal Cancer
    Falchook, Aaron
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (06)