Comparison of manual compression and vascular hemostasis devices after coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention through femoral artery access: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:17
|
作者
Dahal, Khagendra [1 ]
Rijal, Jharendra [2 ]
Shahukhal, Ravi [3 ]
Sharma, Sharan [3 ]
Watti, Hussam [1 ]
Azrin, Michael [4 ]
Katikaneni, Pavan [1 ]
Jimenez, Enrique [5 ]
Tandon, Neeraj [5 ]
Modi, Kalgi [1 ]
Lee, Juyong [4 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Shreveport, LA USA
[2] Brown Univ, Miriam Hosp, Alpert Sch, Div Cardiol,Dept Med, Providence, RI USA
[3] Univ New England, LRG Healthcare, Dept Med, Laconia, NH USA
[4] Univ Connecticut, Hlth Ctr, Calhoun Cardiol Ctr, Farmington, CT USA
[5] Overton Brooks Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Shreveport, LA USA
关键词
Manual compression; Vascular hemostasis device; Time-to-hemostasis; Time-to-ambulation;
D O I
10.1016/j.carrev.2017.08.009
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of manual compression (MC) with vascular hemostasis devices (VHD) in patients undergoing coronary angiography (CA) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) through femoral artery access. Introduction: The use of femoral artery access for coronary procedures may result in access-related complications, prolonged immobility and discomfort for the patients. MC results in longer time-to-hemostasis (TTH) and time-to-ambulation (TTA) compared to VHDs but its role in access-related complications remains unclear in patients undergoing coronary procedures. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL and relevant references for English language randomized controlled trials (RCT) from inception through September 30, 2016. We performed the meta-analysis using random effects model. The outcomes were time-to-hemostasis, time-to-ambulation, major bleeding, large hematoma >5 cm, pseudoaneurysm and other adverse events. Results: The electronic database search resulted in a total of 44 RCTs with a total of 18,802 patients for analysis. MC, compared to VHD resulted in longer TTH [mean difference (MD): 11.21 min; 95% confidence interval (CI) 8.13-14.29; P < 0.00001] and TTA [standardized mean difference: 1.2 (0.79-1.62); P < 0.00001] along with excess risk of hematoma >5 cm formation [risk ratio (RR): 1.38 (1.15-1.67); P = 0.0008]. MC resulted in similar risk of major bleeding [1.01 (0.64-1.60); P = 0.95] pseudoaneurysm [0.99 (0.75-1.29); P = 0.92], infections [0.52 (0.25-1.10); P = 0.09], need of surgery [0.60 (0.29-1.22); P = 0.16), AV fistula [0.93 (0.68-1.27); P = 0.63] and ipsilateral leg ischemia [0.95 (0.57-1.60); P = 0.86] compared to VHD. Conclusion: Manual compression increase time-to-hemostasis, time-to-ambulation and risk of hematoma formation compared vascular hemostasis devices. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 162
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION FROM FEMORAL APPROACH BY RADIAL EXPERTS IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES: A META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Shah, Rahman
    Khan, Sajjad
    Gardner, Jonathan
    Hwang, Inyong
    Leah, John A.
    Goswami, Rohan
    Ramanathan, Kodangudi
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 67 (13) : 59 - 59
  • [22] Chinese Herbal Medicines for Restenosis After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Wu, Jiaming
    Zhao, Lixian
    Lin, Kaixuan
    Lu, Liming
    Luo, Chuanjin
    JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE, 2019, 25 (10) : 983 - 992
  • [23] Percutaneous coronary intervention vs coronary artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Sharma, Sharan P.
    Dahal, Khagendra
    Khatra, Jaspreet
    Rosenfeld, Alan
    Lee, Juyong
    CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 35 (03)
  • [24] Percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery for left main coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Kuno, Toshiki
    Ueyama, Hiroki
    Rao, Sunil V.
    Cohen, Mauricio G.
    Tamis-Holland, Jacqueline E.
    Thompson, Craig
    Takagi, Hisato
    Bangalore, Sripal
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 227 : 9 - 10
  • [25] COMPARISON OF TRANSRADIAL VERSUS TRANSFEMORAL ACCESS FOR PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION IN STEMI PATIENTS: A META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS
    Jhand, Aravdeep
    Atti, Varunsiri
    Dhawan, Rahul
    Turagam, Mohit
    Mamas, A. Mamas
    Brilakis, Emmanouil
    Kumar, Arnav
    Katta, Natraj
    Chatzizisis, Yiannis S.
    Abbott, J.
    Kirtane, Ajay
    Bhatt, Deepak
    Velagapudi, Poonam
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 75 (11) : 1281 - 1281
  • [26] Distal vs Conventional Radial Access for Coronary Angiography and/or Intervention A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
    Ferrante, Giuseppe
    Condello, Francesco
    Rao, Sunil V.
    Maurina, Matteo
    Jolly, Sanjit
    Stefanini, Giulio G.
    Reimers, Bernhard
    Condorelli, Gianluigi
    Lefevre, Thierry
    Pancholy, Samir B.
    Bertrand, Olivier
    Valgimigli, Marco
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2022, 15 (22) : 2297 - 2311
  • [27] Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting - Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
    Yetgin, Tuncay
    Manintveld, Olivier C.
    Boersma, Eric
    Kappetein, Arie P.
    van Geuns, Robert-Jan
    Zijlstra, Felix
    Duncker, Dirk J.
    van der Giessen, Wim J.
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2012, 76 (10) : 2392 - 2404
  • [28] Ultrasound Guidance for Vascular Access for Coronary Angiogram: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Fishkin, Tzvi
    Isath, Ameesh
    Virk, Hafeez Ul Hassan
    Bandyopadhyay, Dhrubajyoti
    Wang, Zhen
    Naidu, Srihari S.
    Jneid, Hani
    Krittanawong, Chayakrit
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 206 : 70 - 72
  • [29] Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients withmultivessel coronary artery disease: Meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials
    Fanari, Zaher
    Weiss, Sandra A.
    Zhang, Wei
    Sonnad, Seema S.
    Weintraub, William S.
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2015, 16 (02) : 70 - 77
  • [30] Effects on Mortality and Major Bleeding of Radial Versus Femoral Artery Access for Coronary Angiography or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data From 7 Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trials
    Gargiulo, Giuseppe
    Giacoppo, Daniele
    Jolly, Sanjit S.
    Cairns, John
    Le May, Michel
    Bernat, Ivo
    Romagnoli, Enrico
    Rao, Sunil, V
    van Leeuwen, Maarten A. H.
    Mehta, Shamir R.
    Bertrand, Olivier F.
    Wells, George A.
    Meijers, Thomas A.
    Siontis, George C. M.
    Esposito, Giovanni
    Windecker, Stephan
    Juni, Peter
    Valgimigli, Marco
    CIRCULATION, 2022, 146 (18) : 1329 - 1343