EXPERT TESTIMONY - SUPREME-COURT TO JUDGES - START THINKING LIKE SCIENTISTS

被引：3

|

作者：

MERVIS, J

机构：

来源：

SCIENCE | 1993年 / 261卷 / 5117期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1126/science.8316850

中图分类号：

O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];

学科分类号：

07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：22 / 22

页数：1

相关论文

共 35 条

[31] EXPLAINING THE TENSION BETWEEN THE SUPREME COURT'S EMBRACE OF VALIDITY AS THE TOUCHSTONE OF ADMISSIBILITY OF EXPERT TESTIMONY AND LOWER COURTS' (SEEMING) REJECTION OF SAME
Saks, Michael J.
EPISTEME-A JOURNAL OF INDIVIDUAL AND SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY, 2008, 5 (03): : 329 - 342
[32] SOCIAL-SCIENCE IN SUPREME-COURT CRIMINAL-CASES AND BRIEFS - THE ACTUAL AND POTENTIAL CONTRIBUTION OF SOCIAL-SCIENTISTS AS AMICI-CURIAE
ACKER, JR
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 1990, 14 (01) : 25 - 42
[33] SCIENCE IN THE COURTROOM - WHAT EVIDENCE IS ADMISSIBLE - AND WHO DECIDES - SOME SCIENTISTS SAY A SUPREME-COURT DECISION TO DEEMPHASIZE PEER-REVIEW HAS LED TO BETTER COURT SCIENCE .1.
HOKE, F
SCIENTIST, 1994, 8 (12): : 1 - &
[34] CONGRATULATIONS - YOU HAVE JUST BEEN APPOINTED JUSTICES TO THE UNITED-STATES SUPREME-COURT - THINKING CRITICALLY ABOUT EQUALITY AND AFFIRMATIVE-ACTION
STORRS, D
FERBER, A
TEACHING SOCIOLOGY, 1992, 20 (04) : 340 - 343
[35] THE FRYE-RULE IS OUT - IS JUNK SCIENCE IN - COMMENTS ON THE RECENT SUPREME-COURT DECISION ON ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE AND ITS IMPLICATION FOR THE EXPERT-WITNESS - A TOXICOLOGISTS PERSPECTIVE
FURST, A
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF TOXICOLOGY, 1995, 14 (01): : 61 - 68

← 1 2 3 4 →