CONVEYOR BELT DESIGN: A COMPUTATIONAL STUDY OF COMPARISON BETWEEN PRACTICAL AND CEMA METHODS

被引:0
|
作者
Santos, D. A. [1 ]
Malagoni, R. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Uberlandia, Fac Engenharia Quim, Uberlandia, MG, Brazil
关键词
belt conveyor; cema method; practical method;
D O I
10.15628/holos.2014.1780
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
There are two main methods used for designing belt conveyors: Practical and CEMA (Conveyor Equipment Manufacture Association). The Practical Method is applicable for systems which convey materials at low to moderate capacities over medium distances. This method first determines the power needed for the drive and finally the stress distribution along the belt conveyor. On the other hand, the CEMA Method, considered more accurate than the Practical Method, first determines the stress distribution before the determination of the power needed for the drive. Higher capacity can be handled by this method and it is applicable to more complex systems. In this work, the two methods cited above were implemented in a computer program which was used to carry out a comparison study taking into account the materials: phosphate rock and itabirite iron ore for different belt conveyor configurations. Both methods have proven to be very useful for designing belt conveyors. The Practical method is suitable for the initial design estimate while the CEMA method is the most recommended for the final design.
引用
收藏
页码:358 / 369
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Design of a laboratory scale Automatic Optical Inspection prototype system for scanning of conveyor belt surfaces-A case study
    Banerjee, Prosenjit
    Chakravarty, Debashish
    Samanta, Biswajit
    MEASUREMENT, 2023, 220
  • [22] Field sampling methods on seismic lines: a comparison between circular plots and belt transects
    Jones, Caren
    Van Dongen, Angeline
    Harvey, Jill
    Degenhardt, Dani
    RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2022, 30 (07)
  • [23] Conceptual design of novel IP-conveyor-belt Weissenberg mode data collection system with multi readers for macromolecular crystallography. A comparison between Galaxy and Super Galaxy
    Sakabe, N
    Sakabe, K
    Sasaki, K
    JOURNAL OF SYNCHROTRON RADIATION, 2004, 11 : 12 - 16
  • [24] Comparison between two computational fluid dynamics methods for gust response predictions
    Wu, Zhenlong
    Gao, Yuan
    He, Xiaoming
    Fu, Weizhe
    Shi, Jianqiang
    Zhang, Zhibo
    Zhou, Ruitao
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART G-JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2023, 237 (12) : 2833 - 2843
  • [25] Comparison between the shifted-Laplacian preconditioning and the controllability methods for computational acoustics
    Airaksinen, Tuomas
    Monkola, Sanna
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2010, 234 (06) : 1796 - 1802
  • [26] COMPUTATIONAL SIMULATIONS IN THE FIELD OF ROBOTIC NEUROREHABILITATION: A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE TRACKING AND PREDICTIVE METHODS
    Mosconi, D.
    Siqueira, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2023, 18 (03) : 251 - 251
  • [27] Rotational barriers of methyl fluorosulfonate and chlorosulfonate: Comparison between computational methods and experiment
    Schmiedekamp, A
    Schmiedekamp, M
    Nair, KPR
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUANTUM CHEMISTRY, 2003, 95 (06) : 719 - 730
  • [28] Comparison between Design Methods Applied to Segmental Tunnel Linings
    Do, N. A.
    Dias, D.
    Oreste, P. P.
    Djeran-Maigre, I.
    GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 45 (03): : 64 - 70
  • [29] Comparison study of seismic design methods for subway structures
    Tao, Lian-Jin
    Wang, Wen-Pei
    Zhang, Bo
    Li, Wen-Bo
    Xu, You-Jun
    2011 International Conference on Multimedia Technology, ICMT 2011, 2011, : 1484 - 1487
  • [30] Comparison of Rosetta flexible-backbone computational protein design methods on binding interactions
    Loshbaugh, Amanda L.
    Kortemme, Tanja
    PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2020, 88 (01) : 206 - 226