Modeling Individual Differences in the Go/No-Go Task With a Diffusion Model

被引:53
|
作者
Ratcliff, Roger [1 ]
Huang-Pollock, Cynthia [2 ]
McKoon, Gail [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Psychol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Psychol, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
来源
DECISION-WASHINGTON | 2018年 / 5卷 / 01期
关键词
diffusion model; reaction time (RT); response accuracy; go/no-go task; CPT task;
D O I
10.1037/dec0000065
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The go/no-go task is one in which there are two choices. but the subject responds only to one of them, waiting out a time-out for the other choice. The task has a long history in psychology and modern applications in the clinical/neuropsychological domain. In this article, we fit a diffusion model to both experimental and simulated data. The model is the same as the two-choice model and assumes that there are two decision boundaries and termination at one of them produces a response, and at the other, the subject waits out the trial. In prior modeling, both two-choice and go/no-go data were fit simultaneously. and only group data were fit. Here the model is fit to just go/no-go data for individual subjects. This allows analyses of individual differences, which is important for clinical applications. First, we fit the standard two-choice model to two-choice data and fit the go/no-go model to reaction times (RTs) from one of the choices and accuracy from the two-choice data. Parameter values were similar between the models and had high correlations. The go/no-go model was also fit to data from a go/no-go version of the task with the same subjects as the two-choice task. A simulation study with ranges of parameter values that are obtained in practice showed similar parameter recovery between the two-choice and go/no-go models. Results show that a diffusion model with an implicit (no response) boundary can be fit to data with almost the same accuracy as fitting the two-choice model to two-choice data.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 62
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Is the go/no-go lexical decision task preferable to the yes/no task with developing readers?
    Moret-Tatay, Carmen
    Perea, Manuel
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 110 (01) : 125 - 132
  • [32] The effect of monetary punishment on error evaluation in a Go/No-go task
    Maruo, Yuya
    Sommer, Werner
    Masaki, Hiroaki
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 120 : 54 - 59
  • [33] Response retrieval in a go/no-go priming-of-popout task
    Burnham, Bryan R.
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2013, 20 (06) : 1187 - 1194
  • [34] Response inhibition in the parametric Go/No-Go task in psychopathic offenders
    Weidacker, Kathrin
    Snowden, Robert J.
    Boy, Frederic
    Johnston, Stephen J.
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2017, 250 : 256 - 263
  • [35] Is the go/no-go lexical decision task an alternative to the yes/no lexical decision task?
    Perea, M
    Rosa, E
    Gómez, C
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2002, 30 (01) : 34 - 45
  • [36] Is the go/no-go lexical decision task an alternative to the yes/no lexical decision task?
    Manuel Perea
    Eva Rosa
    Consolación Gómez
    Memory & Cognition, 2002, 30 : 34 - 45
  • [37] Response retrieval in a go/no-go priming-of-popout task
    Bryan R. Burnham
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2013, 20 : 1187 - 1194
  • [38] Neural correlates of a default response in a delayed Go/No-Go task
    Kalenscher, T
    Güntürkün, O
    Calabrese, P
    Gehlen, W
    Kalt, T
    Diekamp, B
    JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 2005, 84 (03) : 521 - 535
  • [39] Methods for "go/no-go" modeling of compounds in the development pipeline
    Thompson, D
    O'Sullivan, A
    Weinstein, MC
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2004, 7 (03) : 379 - 380
  • [40] Strain Differences in Behavioral Inhibition in a Go/No-go Task Demonstrated Using 15 Inbred Mouse Strains
    Gubner, Noah R.
    Wilhelm, Clare J.
    Phillips, Tamara J.
    Mitchell, Suzanne H.
    ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2010, 34 (08) : 1353 - 1362