Modeling Individual Differences in the Go/No-Go Task With a Diffusion Model

被引:53
|
作者
Ratcliff, Roger [1 ]
Huang-Pollock, Cynthia [2 ]
McKoon, Gail [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Psychol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Psychol, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
来源
DECISION-WASHINGTON | 2018年 / 5卷 / 01期
关键词
diffusion model; reaction time (RT); response accuracy; go/no-go task; CPT task;
D O I
10.1037/dec0000065
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The go/no-go task is one in which there are two choices. but the subject responds only to one of them, waiting out a time-out for the other choice. The task has a long history in psychology and modern applications in the clinical/neuropsychological domain. In this article, we fit a diffusion model to both experimental and simulated data. The model is the same as the two-choice model and assumes that there are two decision boundaries and termination at one of them produces a response, and at the other, the subject waits out the trial. In prior modeling, both two-choice and go/no-go data were fit simultaneously. and only group data were fit. Here the model is fit to just go/no-go data for individual subjects. This allows analyses of individual differences, which is important for clinical applications. First, we fit the standard two-choice model to two-choice data and fit the go/no-go model to reaction times (RTs) from one of the choices and accuracy from the two-choice data. Parameter values were similar between the models and had high correlations. The go/no-go model was also fit to data from a go/no-go version of the task with the same subjects as the two-choice task. A simulation study with ranges of parameter values that are obtained in practice showed similar parameter recovery between the two-choice and go/no-go models. Results show that a diffusion model with an implicit (no response) boundary can be fit to data with almost the same accuracy as fitting the two-choice model to two-choice data.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 62
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A model of the Go/No-Go task
    Gomez, Pablo
    Perea, Manuel
    Ratcliff, Roger
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2007, 136 (03) : 389 - 413
  • [2] The Go/No-go Association Task
    Nosek, BA
    Banaji, MR
    SOCIAL COGNITION, 2001, 19 (06) : 625 - 666
  • [3] Advantage of the go/no-go task over the yes/no lexical decision task: ERP indexes of parameters in the diffusion model
    Lee, Hyeonjin
    Lee, Yoonhyoung
    Tae, Jini
    Kwon, Youan
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (07):
  • [4] Differences in effects of task repetition in three modalities Go/No-go paradigams
    Hirai, Minami
    Ishikura, Keiko
    Sawai, Norie
    Kobayashi, Fumino
    Nakata, Hiroki
    Shibasaki, Manabu
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2020, 34
  • [5] Go or no-go? An assessment of inhibitory control training using the GO/NO-GO task in adolescents
    van Royen, Annelies
    van Malderen, Eva
    Desmeta, Maurane
    Goossens, Lien
    Verbeken, Sandra
    Kemps, Eva
    APPETITE, 2022, 179
  • [6] Modeling the interrelationships between brain activity and trait attention measures to predict individual differences in reaction times in children during a Go/No-Go task
    Taylor, Brittany K.
    Gavin, William J.
    Grimm, Kevin J.
    Passantino, Deborah E.
    Davies, Patricia L.
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2018, 109 : 222 - 231
  • [7] Go/No-Go task performance predicts differences in compulsivity but not in impulsivity personality traits
    Sanchez-Kuhn, Ana
    Juan Leon, Jose
    Gongora, Karinna
    Perez-Fernandez, Cristian
    Sanchez-Santed, Fernando
    Moreno, Margarita
    Flores, Pilar
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2017, 257 : 270 - 275
  • [8] Grading odor similarities in a Go/No-Go task
    Kay, Leslie M.
    Krysiak, Magdalena
    Barlas, Lale
    Bloom Edgerton, Gabrielle
    PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 2006, 88 (4-5) : 339 - 346
  • [9] A formal cognitive model of the Go/No-Go discrimination task: Evaluation and implications
    Yechiam, Eldad
    Goodnight, Jackson
    Bates, John E.
    Busemeyer, Jerome R.
    Dodge, Kenneth A.
    Pettit, Gregory S.
    Newman, Joseph P.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2006, 18 (03) : 239 - 249
  • [10] Sex Differences on the Go/No-Go Test of Inhibition
    Sjoberg, Espen A.
    Cole, Geoff G.
    ARCHIVES OF SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, 2018, 47 (02) : 537 - 542