Evaluation of a Multi-Goal Solver for Use in a Blackboard Architecture

被引:8
|
作者
Straub, Jeremy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Dakota, Dept Comp Sci, Grand Forks, ND 58202 USA
关键词
Autonomous System; Blackboard Architecture; Cyber-Physical System Control; Multi-Goal Solver; Robotic Control;
D O I
10.4018/ijdsst.2014010101
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This article presents a multi-goal solver for problems that can be modeled using a Blackboard Architecture. The Blackboard Architecture can be used for data fusion, robotic control and other applications. It combines the rule-based problem analysis of an expert system with a mechanism for interacting with its operating environment. In this context, numerous control or domain (system-subject) problems may exist which can be solved through reaching one of multiple outcomes. For these problems which have multiple solutions, any of which constitutes an end-goal, a solving mechanism which is solution-choice-agnostic and finds the lowest-cost path to the lowest-cost solution is required. Such a solver mechanism is presented and characterized herein. The performance of the solver (including both the computational time required to ascertain a solution and execute it) is compared to the naive Blackboard approach. This performance characterization is performed across multiple levels of rule counts and rule connectivity. The naive approach is shown to generate a solution faster, but the solutions generated by this approach, in most cases, are inferior to those generated by the solver.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Combining Hindsight with Goal-enhanced Prediction for Multi-goal Reinforcement Learning
    Yang, Rui
    Luo, Feng
    Li, Xiu
    2021 IEEE 33RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TOOLS WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (ICTAI 2021), 2021, : 314 - 321
  • [32] Multi-goal economic search using dynamic search structures
    David Sarne
    Efrat Manisterski
    Sarit Kraus
    Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 2010, 21 : 204 - 236
  • [33] Space-filling forest for multi-goal path planning
    Vonasek, Vojtech
    Penicka, Robert
    2019 24TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES AND FACTORY AUTOMATION (ETFA), 2019, : 1587 - 1590
  • [34] Maximum Entropy-Regularized Multi-Goal Reinforcement Learning
    Zhao, Rui
    Sun, Xudong
    Tresp, Volker
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING, VOL 97, 2019, 97
  • [35] A MULTI-GOAL HEURISTIC FOR FACILITIES DESIGN-PROBLEMS - MUGHAL
    DUTTA, KN
    SAHU, S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 1982, 20 (02) : 147 - 154
  • [36] A Fuzzy Control Strategy for Multi-Goal Autonomous Robot Navigation
    Stavrinidis, Stavros
    Zacharia, Paraskevi
    Xidias, Elias
    SENSORS, 2025, 25 (02)
  • [37] Comparative multi-goal tradeoffs in systems engineering of microbial metabolism
    Byrne, David
    Dumitriu, Alexandra
    Segre, Daniel
    BMC SYSTEMS BIOLOGY, 2012, 6
  • [38] Hindsight Curriculum Generation Based Multi-Goal Experience Replay
    Feng, Xiaoyun
    IMAGE AND GRAPHICS (ICIG 2021), PT III, 2021, 12890 : 182 - 194
  • [39] Multi-Goal Multi-Agent Path Finding via Decoupled and Integrated Goal Vertex Ordering
    Surynek, Pavel
    THIRTY-FIFTH AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, THIRTY-THIRD CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE ELEVENTH SYMPOSIUM ON EDUCATIONAL ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 35 : 12409 - 12417
  • [40] Multi-goal Reinforcement Learning via Exploring Successor Matching
    Feng, Xiaoyun
    2022 IEEE CONFERENCE ON GAMES, COG, 2022, : 401 - 408