High media multitasking habit influences self-referential emotional memory

被引:0
|
作者
Shanu Shukla
机构
[1] Indian Institute of Management Indore,
来源
Cognitive Processing | 2023年 / 24卷
关键词
Emotional processing; Media multitaskers; Self-referential emotional stimuli;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Previous research (Ophir et al. in Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(37):15583–15587, 10.1073/pnas.0903620106, 2009; Uncapher and Wagner in Proc Natl Acad Sci 115(40):9889-9896, 10.1073/pnas.1611612115, 2018; Wiradhany and Koerts in Media Psychol 24(2):276–303, 10.1080/15213269.2019.1685393, 2021) suggested that different groups (high, low, and moderate) of habitual media multitaskers process information differently. Most of these studies focused on comprehending the cognitive differences among them. But there is considerably less information on their differences in processing emotional stimuli. In this article, using self-referential emotional stimuli (‘positive/likeable’ and ‘negative/dislikeable’ words), we aim to examine whether there is any difference in the self-referential emotional memory among different groups of media multitaskers (HMM, MMM, and LMM) using a recall and recognition paradigm. We also investigate whether HMM, MMM, and LMM vary in an emotional categorization task. A total of 120 students (mean age = 20.9 years; males = 84) voluntarily participated and self-reported their preferences for media multitasking using a questionnaire (Ophir et al. 2009). A total of 50 self-referenced words (positive/likeable and negative/dislikeable) were presented to them on a computerized screen for an emotional categorization task. Afterward, they performed a surprise free recall and a recognition task of the same words. Results suggested that HMM were faster in liking ‘positive/likeable’ words over ‘negative/dislikeable’ words in emotional categorization tasks in comparison with LMM and MMM. HMM and MMM performed poorly in both the recall and recognition of ‘positive/likeable’ emotional words compared to LMM. No significant difference was observed in recall and recognition between HMM and MMM. The three groups did not differ significantly in the recall and recognition tasks related to ‘negative/dislikeable’ emotional words. These findings help understand the differences in processing self-related emotional stimuli among different groups of media multitaskers.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 81
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Disrupted network switching in euthymic bipolar disorder: Working memory and self-referential paradigms
    Porta-Casteras, D.
    Cano, M.
    Navarra-Ventura, G.
    Serra-Blasco, M.
    Vicent-Gil, M.
    Sole, B.
    Montejo, L.
    Torrent, C.
    Martinez-Aran, A.
    Harrison, B. J.
    Palao, D.
    Vieta, E.
    Cardoner, N.
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2023, 320 : 552 - 560
  • [42] Self-referential encoding does not benefit memory for prior remembering across changing contexts
    Leppanen, Marcus L.
    Navangul, Anaya S.
    Feder, Gabriella I.
    Jones, Dominoe A.
    Kim, Kyungmi
    MEMORY, 2021, 29 (09) : 1176 - 1185
  • [43] Delineating self-referential processing from episodic memory retrieval: Common and dissociable networks
    Sajonz, Bastian
    Kahnt, Thorsten
    Margulies, Daniel S.
    Park, Soyoung Q.
    Wittmann, Andre
    Stoy, Meline
    Stroehle, Andreas
    Heinz, Andreas
    Northoff, Georg
    Bermpohl, Felix
    NEUROIMAGE, 2010, 50 (04) : 1606 - 1617
  • [44] The effects of cognitive defusion and thought distraction on emotional discomfort and believability of negative self-referential thoughts
    Masud, Akihiko
    Twohig, Michael P.
    Stormo, Analia R.
    Feinstein, Amanda B.
    Chou, Ying-Yi
    Wendell, Johanna W.
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOR THERAPY AND EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 41 (01) : 11 - 17
  • [45] Neural mechanisms supporting emotional and self-referential information processing and encoding in older and younger adults
    Daley, Ryan T.
    Bowen, Holly J.
    Fields, Eric C.
    Parisi, Katelyn R.
    Gutchess, Angela
    Kensinger, Elizabeth A.
    SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 15 (04) : 405 - 421
  • [46] Advertising self-referential of Diario Gaucho: mise en scene of media product and the reader
    Depexe, Sandra Dalcul
    Amaral, Marcia Franz
    EM QUESTAO, 2010, 16 (01): : 209 - 222
  • [47] Survival processing versus self-reference: A memory advantage following descriptive self-referential encoding
    Dewhurst, Stephen A.
    Anderson, Rachel J.
    Grace, Lydia
    Boland, Jennifer
    JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2017, 94 : 291 - 304
  • [48] Preferences of high- and low-hope people for self-referential input
    Snyder, CR
    LaPointe, AB
    Crowson, JJ
    Early, S
    COGNITION & EMOTION, 1998, 12 (06) : 807 - 823
  • [49] The role of medial prefrontal cortex in processing emotional self-referential information: a combined TMS/fMRI study
    Nicola De Pisapia
    Guido Barchiesi
    Jorge Jovicich
    Luigi Cattaneo
    Brain Imaging and Behavior, 2019, 13 : 603 - 614
  • [50] Reduced self-referential source memory performance is associated with interpersonal dysfunction in borderline personality disorder
    Minzenberg, MJ
    Fisher-Irving, M
    Poole, JH
    Vinogradov, S
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 2006, 20 (01) : 42 - 54