Arthroscopic Bankart repair associated with subscapularis augmentation (ASA) versus open Latarjet to treat recurrent anterior shoulder instability with moderate glenoid bone loss: clinical comparison of two series

被引:20
|
作者
Russo R. [1 ]
Della Rotonda G. [1 ]
Cautiero F. [1 ]
Ciccarelli M. [1 ]
Maiotti M. [2 ]
Massoni C. [2 ]
Di Pietto F. [3 ]
Zappia M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Orthopedic and Traumatology Unit, Pellegrini Hospital, Naples
[2] Sport Traumatology Unit, San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital, Rome
[3] Diagnostic Imaging Department AORN A. Cardarelli, Naples
[4] Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, Campobasso
关键词
Anterior shoulder instability; Arthroscopic Bankart repair; Arthroscopic subscapularis augmentation; Glenoid bone loss; Open Latarjet–Patte procedure;
D O I
10.1007/s12306-016-0446-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: The treatment of chronic anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss is still debated. The purpose of this study is to compare short-term results of two techniques treating chronic shoulder instability with moderate glenoid bone loss: bone block according to open Latarjet–Patte procedure and arthroscopic Bankart repair in association with subscapularis augmentation. Methods: Ninety-one patients with moderate anterior glenoid bone loss underwent from 2011 to 2015. From these patients, two groups of 20 individuals each have been selected. The groups were homogeneous in terms of age, gender, dominance and glenoid bone loss. In group A, an open Latarjet procedure has been performed, and in group B, an arthroscopic Bankart repair associated with subscapularis augmentation has been performed. The mean follow-up in group A was 21 months (20–39 months), while in group B was 20 months (15–36 months). QuickDash score, Constant and Rowe shoulder scores, were used for evaluations of results. Results: The mean preoperative rate of QuickDash score was 3.6 for group A and 4.0 for group B; Rowe Score was 50.0 for group A and 50.0 for group B. Preoperative mean Constant score was 56.2 for Latarjet–Patte and 55.2 for Bankart plus ASA. Postoperative mean QuickDash score was in group A 1.8 and 1.7 in group B; Rowe Score was 89.8 and 91.6; Constant Score was 93.3 and 93.8. No complications related to surgery have been observed for both procedures. Not statistically significant difference was reported between the two groups (p >.05). Postoperatively, the mean deficit of external rotation in ER1 was −9° in group A and −8 in group B; In ER2, the mean deficit was −5° in both groups (p = .0942). Conclusions: Arthroscopic subscapularis augmentation of Bankart repair is an effective procedure for the treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss without any significant difference in comparison with the well-known open Latarjet procedure. © 2016, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 83
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical Outcomes of Revision Arthroscopic Capsulolabral Repair for Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability With Moderate Glenoid Bone Defects: A Comparison With Primary Surgery
    Jeon, Young Dae
    Kim, Hyong Suk
    Rhee, Sung-Min
    Jeong, Myeong Gon
    Oh, Joo Han
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (12)
  • [22] Correction to: Cost-effectiveness analysis of arthroscopic Bankart repair versus open Latarjet reconstruction in anterior shoulder instability
    Mattia Pugliese
    Mattia Loppini
    Elena Vanni
    Umile Giuseppe Longo
    Alessandro Castagna
    International Orthopaedics, 2023, 47 : 1885 - 1885
  • [23] Comparison of Return to Sports and Competition After the Arthroscopic Bristow-Latarjet Procedure Versus Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in Adolescents With Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability
    Rosello, Olivier
    Barret, Hugo
    Langlais, Tristan
    Boileau, Pascal
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2024, 52 (06): : 1457 - 1463
  • [24] Critical Value of Anterior Glenoid Bone Loss That Leads to Recurrent Glenohumeral Instability After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair
    Shin, Sang-Jin
    Kim, Rag Gyu
    Jeon, Yoon Sang
    Kwon, Tae Hun
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2017, 45 (09): : 1975 - 1981
  • [25] Arthroscopic Versus Open Latarjet in the Treatment of Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Dislocation With Marked Glenoid Bone Loss: A Prospective Comparative Study: Response
    Jiang, Chunyan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2018, 46 (05): : NP10 - NP10
  • [26] Comparison of reconstructive procedures for glenoid bone loss associated with recurrent anterior shoulder instability
    Noonan, Benjamin
    Hollister, Scott J.
    Sekiya, Jon K.
    Bedi, Asheesh
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2014, 23 (08) : 1113 - 1119
  • [27] Arthroscopic Versus Open Latarjet in the Treatment of Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Dislocation With Marked Glenoid Bone Loss: A Prospective Comparative Study: Letter to the Editor
    Ryliskis, Sigitas
    Siomin, Konstantin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2018, 46 (05): : NP9 - NP10
  • [28] Mid-term outcomes of arthroscopic Latarjet procedure in chronic anterior shoulder instability after failed Bankart surgery or with significant glenoid bone loss
    Krajcsovics, N.
    Vajczikov, A. S.
    Svec, A.
    Pasiar, J.
    BRATISLAVA MEDICAL JOURNAL-BRATISLAVSKE LEKARSKE LISTY, 2021, 122 (08): : 559 - 566
  • [29] Long-term Results of the Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability in Patients Older Than 40 Years: A Comparison With the Open Latarjet Procedure
    Ernstbrunner, Lukas
    De Nard, Bianca
    Olthof, Maurits
    Beeler, Silvan
    Bouaicha, Samy
    Gerber, Christian
    Wieser, Karl
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 48 (09): : 2090 - 2096
  • [30] Arthroscopic Autologous Scapular Spine Bone Graft Combined With Bankart Repair for Anterior Shoulder Instability With Subcritical (10%-15%) Glenoid Bone Loss
    Xiang, Ming
    Yang, Jinsong
    Chen, Hang
    Hu, Xiaochuan
    Zhang, Qing
    Li, Yiping
    Jiang, Chunyan
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2021, 37 (07): : 2065 - 2074