Role of Gastric Acid in Stomal Ulcer after Gastric Bypass

被引:0
|
作者
Jakob Hedberg
Hans Hedenström
Sven Nilsson
Magnus Sundbom
Sven Gustavsson
机构
来源
Obesity Surgery | 2005年 / 15卷
关键词
GASTRIC BYPASS; STOMAL ULCER; GASTRIC ACID;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The pathogenetic mechanisms of stomal ulcer after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) are unclear. In order to study the role of gastric acid, we measured acidity in the proximal pouch using a pH-sensitive probe. Methods: 6 patients (5 females, mean age 45 years old at time of operation) with endoscopically confirmed stomal ulcer, were studied 2 to 6 years after RYGBP. All complained of epigastric pain that improved during proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. Control subjects were 6 females (50 years old) who had had RYGBP at least 5 years earlier and denied symptoms of epigastric pain or heartburn. The pH-sensitive probe (Digitrapper-pH, Medtronic) was passed through the nose to the proximal pouch, guided by the calculated distance and pH response. The probe was left in place for 4 hours. The percentage of time with pH <4 was calculated. Results: The probe could be accurately positioned in the proximal pouch both in symptomatic patients and in controls as evidenced by the acid pH reaction. The proximal pouches of patients with stomal ulcer were significantly more exposed to acid compared to controls. The median percentage of time with pH <4 was 69% and 20% in the stomal ulcer and the control group, respectively (P<0.01). Barium follow-through excluded gastro-gastric fistula in stomal ulcer patients. Conclusion: RYGBP patients with stomal ulcer have increased acid production in their proximal pouch in comparison with asymptomatic RYGBP patients. Gastric acid appears to have an important role in the pathogenesis of stomal ulcer.
引用
收藏
页码:1375 / 1378
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Gastric Stomal Ulcers Following Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
    A. Hussain
    S. EL-Hasani
    Obesity Surgery, 2014, 24 : 2171 - 2171
  • [22] STOMAL ULCERATION AFTER GASTRIC SURGERY
    THOMPSON, JE
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1956, 143 (05) : 697 - 707
  • [23] STOMAL COMPLICATIONS OF GASTRIC BYPASS - INCIDENCE AND OUTCOME OF THERAPY
    SANYAL, AJ
    SUGERMAN, HJ
    KELLUM, JM
    ENGLE, KM
    WOLFE, L
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1992, 87 (09): : 1165 - 1169
  • [24] Peptic ulcer/stricture after gastric bypass: A comparison of technique and acid suppression variables
    Pope, GD
    Goodney, PP
    Burchard, KW
    Proia, RR
    Olafsson, A
    Lacy, BE
    Burrows, LJ
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2002, 12 (01) : 30 - 33
  • [25] Peptic Ulcer/Stricture After Gastric Bypass: A Comparison of Technique and Acid Suppression Variables
    G Darby Pope
    Philip P Goodney
    Kenneth W Burchard
    Richard R Proia
    Andri Olafsson
    Brian E Lacy
    Lara J Burrows
    Obesity Surgery, 2002, 12 : 30 - 33
  • [26] Endoscopic management of stomal stenosis after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
    Go, MR
    Muscarella, P
    Needleman, BJ
    Cook, CH
    Melvin, WS
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2004, 18 (01): : 56 - 59
  • [27] Catastrophic Bleeding From a Marginal Ulcer After Gastric Bypass
    Sidani, Shafik
    Akkary, Ehab
    Bell, Robert
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2013, 17 (01) : 148 - 151
  • [28] Linear or circular: Anastomotic ulcer after gastric bypass surgery
    Schaefer, Aline
    Gehwolf, Philipp
    Kienzl-Wagner, Katrin
    Cakar-Beck, Fergul
    Wykypiel, Heinz
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (05): : 3011 - 3018
  • [29] Linear or circular: Anastomotic ulcer after gastric bypass surgery
    Aline Schäfer
    Philipp Gehwolf
    Katrin Kienzl-Wagner
    Fergül Cakar-Beck
    Heinz Wykypiel
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2022, 36 : 3011 - 3018
  • [30] Endoscopic management of stomal stenosis after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
    Kumbhari, Vivek
    Tieu, Alan H.
    Ngamruengphong, Saowanee
    Aguila, Gerard
    Schweitzer, Michael A.
    Khashab, Mouen A.
    Singh, Vikesh K.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 82 (04) : 747 - 747