Extending constraint logic programming for temporal reasoning

被引:0
|
作者
Evelina Lamma
Michela Milano
Paola Mello
机构
[1] Università di Bologna,DEIS
[2] Viale Risorgimento 2,Dipartimento di Ingegneria
[3] Università di Ferrara Via Saragat 1,undefined
关键词
Logic Program; Constraint Solver; Constraint Graph; Temporal Reasoning; Binary Constraint;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In recent years, several constraint‐based temporal reasoning frameworks have been proposed. They consider temporal points or intervals as domain elements linked by temporal constraints. Temporal reasoning in these systems is based on constraint propagation. In this paper, we argue that a language based on constraint propagation can be a suitable tool for expressing and reasoning about temporal problems. We concentrate on Constraint Logic Programming (CLP) which is a powerful programming paradigm combining the advantages of Logic Programming and the efficiency of constraint solving. However, CLP presents some limitations in dealing with temporal reasoning. First, it uses an “arc consistency” propagation algorithm which is embedded in the inference engine, cannot be changed by the user, and is too weak in many temporal frameworks. Second, CLP is not able to deal with qualitative temporal constraints. We present a general meta CLP architecture which maintains the advantages of CLP, but overcomes these two main limitations. Each architectural level is a finite domain constraint solver(CLP(FD)) that reasons about constraints of the underlying level. Based on this conceptual architecture, we extend the CLP(FD)language and we specialize the extension proposed on Vilain and Kautz’sPoint Algebra, on Allen’s Interval Algebra and on the STP framework by Dechter, Meiri and Pearl. In particular, we show that we can cope effectively with disjunctive constraints even in an interval‐based framework.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 158
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] NONMONOTONIC REASONING WITH LOGIC PROGRAMMING
    PEREIRA, LM
    APARICIO, JN
    ALFERES, JJ
    JOURNAL OF LOGIC PROGRAMMING, 1993, 17 (2-4): : 227 - 263
  • [32] CONSTRAINT SATISFACTION USING CONSTRAINT LOGIC PROGRAMMING
    VANHENTENRYCK, P
    SIMONIS, H
    DINCBAS, M
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1992, 58 (1-3) : 113 - 159
  • [33] NEGATION AND CONSTRAINT LOGIC PROGRAMMING
    STUCKEY, PJ
    INFORMATION AND COMPUTATION, 1995, 118 (01) : 12 - 33
  • [34] CONSTRAINT LOGIC PROGRAMMING - A SURVEY
    JAFFAR, J
    MAHER, MJ
    JOURNAL OF LOGIC PROGRAMMING, 1994, 20 : 503 - 581
  • [35] Conditional reasoning in logic programming
    Gabbay, D
    Giordano, L
    Martelli, A
    Olivetti, N
    Sapino, ML
    JOURNAL OF LOGIC PROGRAMMING, 2000, 44 (1-3): : 37 - 74
  • [36] A CONSTRAINT LOGIC PROGRAMMING SHELL
    LIM, P
    STUCKEY, PJ
    LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, 1990, 456 : 75 - 88
  • [37] AN INTRODUCTION TO CONSTRAINT LOGIC PROGRAMMING
    KRIWACZEK, F
    LECTURE NOTES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1992, 617 : 82 - 94
  • [38] Coinductive Constraint Logic Programming
    Saeedloei, Neda
    Gupta, Gopal
    FUNCTIONAL AND LOGIC PROGRAMMING (FLOPS 2012), 2012, 7294 : 243 - 259
  • [39] Functional and (Constraint) Logic Programming
    Escobar, Santiago
    Falaschi, Moreno
    INFORMATION AND COMPUTATION, 2014, 235 : 1 - 2
  • [40] Sets and constraint logic programming
    Dovier, A
    Piazza, C
    Pontelli, E
    Rossi, G
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES AND SYSTEMS, 2000, 22 (05): : 861 - 931