In vitro evaluation of various bioabsorbable and nonresorbable barrier membranes for guided tissue regeneration

被引:78
|
作者
Kasaj A. [1 ]
Reichert C. [1 ]
Götz H. [2 ]
Röhrig B. [3 ]
Smeets R. [4 ]
Willershausen B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz
[2] Institute of Applied Structure and Microanalysis, Medical Faculty, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz
[3] Institute for Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz
[4] Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Aachen University
关键词
Collagen Membrane; Gingival Fibroblast; Human Gingival Fibroblast; Guide Tissue Regeneration; Alamar Blue Assay;
D O I
10.1186/1746-160X-4-22
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Different types of bioabsorbable and nonresorbable membranes have been widely used for guided tissue regeneration (GTR) with its ultimate goal of regenerating lost periodontal structures. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the biological effects of various bioabsorbable and nonresorbable membranes in cultures of primary human gingival fibroblasts (HGF), periodontal ligament fibroblasts (PDLF) and human osteoblast-like (HOB) cells in vitro. Methods. Three commercially available collagen membranes [TutoDent® (TD), Resodont® (RD) and BioGide® (BG)] as well as three nonresorbable polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membranes [ACE (AC), Cytoplast® (CT) and TefGen-FD® (TG)] were tested. Cells plated on culture dishes (CD) served as positive controls. The effect of the barrier membranes on HGF, PDLF as well as HOB cells was assessed by the Alamar Blue fluorometric proliferation assay after 1, 2.5, 4, 24 and 48 h time periods. The structural and morphological properties of the membranes were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results. The results showed that of the six barriers tested, TD and RD demonstrated the highest rate of HGF proliferation at both earlier (1 h) and later (48 h) time periods (P < 0.001) compared to all other tested barriers and CD. Similarly, TD, RD and BG had significantly higher numbers of cells at all time periods when compared with the positive control in PDLF culture (P ≤; 0.001). In HOB cell culture, the highest rate of cell proliferation was also calculated for TD at all time periods (P < 0.001). SEM observations demonstrated a microporous structure of all collagen membranes, with a compact top surface and a porous bottom surface, whereas the nonresorbable PTFE membranes demonstrated a homogenous structure with a symmetric dense skin layer. Conclusion. Results from the present study suggested that GTR membrane materials, per se, may influence cell proliferation in the process of periodontal tissue/bone regeneration. Among the six membranes examined, the bioabsorbable membranes demonstrated to be more suitable to stimulate cellular proliferation compared to nonresorbable PTFE membranes. © 2008 Kasaj et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Absorbable Guided Tissue Regeneration Membranes
    Ren Tianbin
    Cao Chunhong
    Wang Gang
    Su Jiansheng
    Yuan Weizhong
    Ren Jie
    PROGRESS IN CHEMISTRY, 2010, 22 (01) : 179 - 185
  • [32] Evaluation of a bioabsorbable physical barrier for guided bone regeneration. Part I. Material alone
    Mellonig, JT
    Nevins, M
    Sanchez, R
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 1998, 18 (02) : 129 - 137
  • [33] Preparation and In Vitro Evaluation of Chitosan Bioelectret Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration
    Wang, Yanying
    Qu, Yili
    Gong, Ping
    Wang, Ping
    Man, Yi
    Li, Jidong
    JOURNAL OF BIOACTIVE AND COMPATIBLE POLYMERS, 2010, 25 (06) : 622 - 633
  • [34] Mussel-inspired antimicrobial coating on PTFE barrier membranes for guided tissue regeneration
    Nardo, Tiziana
    Chiono, Valeria
    Carmagnola, Irene
    Fracchia, Letizia
    Ceresa, Chiara
    Tabrizian, Maryam
    Ciardelli, Gianluca
    BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2021, 16 (03)
  • [35] In vitro evaluation of barrier function against oral bacteria of dense and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membranes for guided bone regeneration
    Trobos, Margarita
    Juhlin, Annika
    Shah, Furqan A.
    Hoffman, Maria
    Sahlin, Herman
    Dahlin, Christer
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2018, 20 (05) : 738 - 748
  • [36] In vitro comparison of bioabsorbable and non-resorbable membranes in bone regeneration
    Marinucci, L
    Lilli, C
    Baroni, T
    Becchetti, E
    Belcastro, S
    Balducci, C
    Locci, P
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2001, 72 (06) : 753 - 759
  • [37] Attachment, proliferation and differentiation of periodontal ligament cells on various guided tissue regeneration membranes
    Takata, T
    Wang, HL
    Miyauchi, M
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH, 2001, 36 (05) : 322 - 327
  • [38] An in vitro evaluation of the antibacterial properties of barriers used in guided tissue regeneration
    Chogle, S
    Mickel, AK
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2003, 29 (01) : 1 - 3
  • [39] Guided tissue regeneration in human class II furcations and interproximal infrabony defects after using a bioabsorbable membrane barrier
    Sanz, M
    Zabalegui, I
    Villa, A
    Sicilia, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 1997, 17 (06) : 563 - 573
  • [40] The use of collagen membranes in guided tissue regeneration
    Bubalo, Marija
    Lazic, Zoran
    Tatic, Zoran
    Milovic, Radomir
    Magic, Marko
    VOJNOSANITETSKI PREGLED, 2017, 74 (08) : 767 - 772