Detailed Seismic Hazard, Disaggregation and Sensitivity Analysis for the Indo-Gangetic Basin

被引:0
|
作者
Ketan Bajaj
P. Anbazhagan
机构
[1] Indian Institute of Science,
来源
关键词
Indo-Gangetic basin; seismicity parameters; disaggregation; sensitivity analysis; hazard analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Seismic hazard in terms of peak ground acceleration (PGA) and spectral acceleration (SA) for the seismically active Indo-Gangetic Basin (IGB) has been computed using both a fault model and spatially smoothed-grid seismicity model. Seismicity parameters, viz. minimum magnitude, the maximum regional magnitude Mmax\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${M}_{\mathrm{max}}$$\end{document}, mean seismic activity rate λ\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\lambda $$\end{document}, the slope of the frequency–magnitude Gutenberg–Richter relationship, and the β-value (bln(10)\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$bln(10)$$\end{document}), have been estimated spatially. The layered seismogenic source framework based on hypocentral depth distribution, i.e. 0–25, 25–70, and 70–180 km, for the smoothed-grid seismicity model has also been employed. The lowest λ4\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\lambda }_{4}$$\end{document} and λ5\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\lambda }_{5}$$\end{document} values for the IGB are 0.05 to 0.02 and 0.015 to 0.005, respectively, in the southern part of the IGB for hypocentral depth variation of 0–25 km. The IGB has a significant variation of seismicity in the entire stretch with noteworthy clustering in the northern side, which gradually decreases towards the south, and the spatial variability of the b-value and Mmax\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${M}_{\mathrm{max}}$$\end{document} are 0.65–1.15 and 5.0–8.4 Mw\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${M}_{w}$$\end{document}, respectively. A ground-motion prediction equation has been selected and weighted by carrying out the efficacy test considering the past earthquakes. The disaggregation process is used for determining the spatial contribution of different magnitudes and distances for the whole IGB. Sensitivity analysis is used for examining the effect of various parameters. The PGA for the IGB varies from 0.06 to 0.54 g for 2% and 0.03 to 0.32 g for a 10% probability of exceedance in 50 years at bedrock condition. The developed average uniform hazard spectra in this study match well with the spectra derived from recorded ground motion. Based on the disaggregation process, dominant magnitude and distance are in the range of 4.7 to 6.0 Mw\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${M}_{w}$$\end{document} and 15 to 75 km, respectively, in the case of PGA and change to 5.5–7.2 Mw\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${M}_{w}$$\end{document} and 45 to 150 km in the case of 0.5 s and 5.8–7.5 Mw\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${M}_{w}$$\end{document} and 70 to 250 km in the case of 2.0 s. Sensitivity analysis suggested that increase in maximum magnitude and distance has an impact on hazard level over a longer period. This is the first time a detailed hazard analysis has been presented for the IGB.
引用
收藏
页码:1977 / 1999
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] QUATERNARY SEDIMENTATION IN THE INDO-GANGETIC BASIN - A REVIEW - COMMENT
    GHOSH, DK
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 1994, 66 (09): : 620 - 621
  • [12] INDO-GANGETIC BASIN, RING STRUCTURES AND CONTINENTAL DRIFT
    KOCHHAR, N
    NATURE-PHYSICAL SCIENCE, 1973, 242 (122): : 141 - 142
  • [13] Anthropogenic aerosols in precipitation over the Indo-Gangetic basin
    Sharma, Anshumala
    Khare, Puja
    Singh, Nahar
    Tiwari, Suresh
    Chate, D. M.
    Kumar, Ranjit
    ENVIRONMENTAL GEOCHEMISTRY AND HEALTH, 2023, 45 (03) : 961 - 980
  • [14] QUATERNARY SEDIMENTATION IN THE INDO-GANGETIC BASIN - A REVIEW - REPLY
    PANT, CC
    SHARMA, AK
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 1994, 66 (09): : 621 - 621
  • [15] Seasonal variability of aerosols over the Indo-Gangetic basin
    Jethva, H
    Satheesh, SK
    Srinivasan, J
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2005, 110 (D21) : 1 - 15
  • [16] Seismic risk assessment for central Indo-Gangetic Plains, India
    Raghucharan, Manikya Choudari
    Somala, Surendra Nadh
    Erteleva, Olga
    Rogozhin, Evgenii
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES, 2021, 13 (02): : 77 - 93
  • [17] Is Irrigation Water Free? A Reality Check in the Indo-Gangetic Basin
    Shah, Tushaar
    Hassan, Mehmood Ul
    Khattak, Muhammad Zubair
    Banerjee, Parth Sarthi
    Singh, O. P.
    Rehman, Saeed Ur
    WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2009, 37 (02) : 422 - 434
  • [18] PREDICTION OF SUBSIDENCE IN THE INDO-GANGETIC BASIN CARRIED BY GROUNDWATER WITHDRAWAL
    MISHRA, SK
    SINGH, RP
    CHANDRA, S
    ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 1993, 33 (03) : 227 - 239
  • [19] REMOTE SENSING OF DUST STORMS OVER THE INDO-GANGETIC BASIN
    El-Askary, Hesham
    Gautam, Ritesh
    Kafatos, Menas
    JOURNAL OF THE INDIAN SOCIETY OF REMOTE SENSING, 2004, 32 (02) : 121 - 124
  • [20] Remote sensing of dust storms over the indo-gangetic basin
    Hesham El-Askary
    Ritesh Gautam
    Menas Kafatos
    Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 2004, 32 : 121 - 124