4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement

被引:0
|
作者
Petter Dyverfeldt
Malenka Bissell
Alex J. Barker
Ann F. Bolger
Carl-Johan Carlhäll
Tino Ebbers
Christopher J. Francios
Alex Frydrychowicz
Julia Geiger
Daniel Giese
Michael D. Hope
Philip J. Kilner
Sebastian Kozerke
Saul Myerson
Stefan Neubauer
Oliver Wieben
Michael Markl
机构
[1] Linköping University,Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medical and Health Sciences
[2] Linköping University,Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization
[3] University of Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research,Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine
[4] Northwestern University,Department of Radiology
[5] University of California San Francisco,Department of Medicine
[6] Linköping University,Department of Clinical Physiology, Department of Medical and Health Sciences
[7] University of Wisconsin,Department of Radiology
[8] University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein,Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin
[9] University Children’s Hospital Zurich,Department of Radiology
[10] University Hospital of Cologne,Department of Radiology
[11] University of California San Francisco,Department of Radiology
[12] Imperial College,NIHR Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, National Heart and Lung Institute
[13] University and ETH Zurich,Institute for Biomedical Engineering
[14] University of Wisconsin,Department of Medical Physics
[15] Northwestern University,Department of Biomedical Engineering
关键词
4D Flow CMR; 4D Flow MRI; Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging; MR flow imaging; Hemodynamics; Flow visualization; Flow quantification; Recommendations; Clinical; Cardiovascular;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Pulsatile blood flow through the cavities of the heart and great vessels is time-varying and multidirectional. Access to all regions, phases and directions of cardiovascular flows has formerly been limited. Four-dimensional (4D) flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has enabled more comprehensive access to such flows, with typical spatial resolution of 1.5×1.5×1.5 – 3×3×3 mm3, typical temporal resolution of 30–40 ms, and acquisition times in the order of 5 to 25 min. This consensus paper is the work of physicists, physicians and biomedical engineers, active in the development and implementation of 4D Flow CMR, who have repeatedly met to share experience and ideas. The paper aims to assist understanding of acquisition and analysis methods, and their potential clinical applications with a focus on the heart and greater vessels. We describe that 4D Flow CMR can be clinically advantageous because placement of a single acquisition volume is straightforward and enables flow through any plane across it to be calculated retrospectively and with good accuracy. We also specify research and development goals that have yet to be satisfactorily achieved. Derived flow parameters, generally needing further development or validation for clinical use, include measurements of wall shear stress, pressure difference, turbulent kinetic energy, and intracardiac flow components. The dependence of measurement accuracy on acquisition parameters is considered, as are the uses of different visualization strategies for appropriate representation of time-varying multidirectional flow fields. Finally, we offer suggestions for more consistent, user-friendly implementation of 4D Flow CMR acquisition and data handling with a view to multicenter studies and more widespread adoption of the approach in routine clinical investigations.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of different methods for the estimation of aortic pulse wave velocity from 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance
    Sophia Houriez--Gombaud-Saintonge
    Elie Mousseaux
    Ioannis Bargiotas
    Alain De Cesare
    Thomas Dietenbeck
    Kevin Bouaou
    Alban Redheuil
    Gilles Soulat
    Alain Giron
    Umit Gencer
    Damian Craiem
    Emmanuel Messas
    Emilie Bollache
    Yasmina Chenoune
    Nadjia Kachenoura
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 21
  • [32] Test-retest variability of left ventricular 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance measurements in healthy subjects
    Stoll, Victoria M.
    Loudon, Margaret
    Eriksson, Jonatan
    Bissell, Malenka M.
    Dyverfeldt, Petter
    Ebbers, Tino
    Myerson, Saul G.
    Neubauer, Stefan
    Carlhall, Carl-Johan
    Hess, Aaron T.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2018, 20
  • [33] 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance recovery profiles following pulmonary endarterectomy in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
    Dong, Melody L.
    Azarine, Arshid
    Haddad, Francois
    Amsallem, Myriam
    Kim, Young-Wouk
    Yang, Weiguang
    Fadel, Elie
    Aubrege, Laure
    Loecher, Michael
    Ennis, Daniel
    Pavec, Jerome Le
    Vignon-Clementel, Irene
    Feinstein, Jeffrey A.
    Mercier, Olaf
    Marsden, Alison L.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2022, 24 (01)
  • [34] Rationale and clinical applications of 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in assessment of valvular heart disease: a comprehensive review
    Gorecka, Miroslawa
    Bissell, Malenka M.
    Higgins, David M.
    Garg, Pankaj
    Plein, Sven
    Greenwood, John P.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2022, 24 (01)
  • [35] Accelerated aortic 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance using compressed sensing: applicability, validation and clinical integration
    Neuhaus, Elisabeth
    Weiss, Kilian
    Bastkowski, Rene
    Koopmann, Jonas
    Maintz, David
    Giese, Daniel
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2019, 21 (01)
  • [36] Rationale and clinical applications of 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in assessment of valvular heart disease: a comprehensive review
    Miroslawa Gorecka
    Malenka M. Bissell
    David M. Higgins
    Pankaj Garg
    Sven Plein
    John P. Greenwood
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 24
  • [37] 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance recovery profiles following pulmonary endarterectomy in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
    Melody L. Dong
    Arshid Azarine
    Francois Haddad
    Myriam Amsallem
    Young-Wouk Kim
    Weiguang Yang
    Elie Fadel
    Laure Aubrege
    Michael Loecher
    Daniel Ennis
    Jérôme Le Pavec
    Irene Vignon-Clementel
    Jeffrey A. Feinstein
    Olaf Mercier
    Alison L. Marsden
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 24
  • [38] Test-retest variability of left ventricular 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance measurements in healthy subjects
    Victoria M. Stoll
    Margaret Loudon
    Jonatan Eriksson
    Malenka M. Bissell
    Petter Dyverfeldt
    Tino Ebbers
    Saul G. Myerson
    Stefan Neubauer
    Carl- Johan Carlhäll
    Aaron T. Hess
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 20
  • [39] Comparison of different methods for the estimation of aortic pulse wave velocity from 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance
    Houriez-Gombaud-Saintonge, Sophia
    Mousseaux, Elie
    Bargiotas, Ioannis
    De Cesare, Alain
    Dietenbeck, Thomas
    Bouaou, Kevin
    Redheuil, Alban
    Soulat, Gilles
    Giron, Alain
    Gencer, Umit
    Craiem, Damian
    Messas, Emmanuel
    Bollache, Emilie
    Chenoune, Yasmina
    Kachenoura, Nadjia
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2019, 21 (01)
  • [40] Comprehensive 4D velocity mapping of the heart and great vessels by cardiovascular magnetic resonance
    Markl, Michael
    Kilner, Philip J.
    Ebbers, Tino
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2011, 13