Are private banks the better banks? An insight into the principal–agent structure and risk-taking behavior of German banks

被引:0
|
作者
Schmielewski F. [1 ]
Wein T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leuphana University of Lüneburg, Lüneburg
关键词
Capital and ownership structure; Capital asset ratio; Distance-to-default; Efficient portfolios; Financial crises; Government policy and regulation; Information asymmetries and market efficiency; Monitoring capabilities; Return on assets; Risk aversion; Risk pooling; Risk-taking behavior; Seeking for high returns;
D O I
10.1007/s12197-013-9266-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this study, we hypothesize that the distinguishable principal–agent relationships of German banks significantly influence the risk-taking attitudes of bank managers. In particular, we substantiate the theory that banks owned by dispersed shareholders, or federal state authorities, face a higher relevance of principal–agent problems than other banking sectors due to the lack of monitoring bank managers. Our results show that lack of accountability allows bank managers the liberty to participate in risk-taking behavior. First we present, from the bank owners’ viewpoint, a theoretical model to explain three factors of principal–agent relationships used to determine the highest probability of choosing an optimal portfolio of risky assets. The three factors are: the ability to control bank managers, the risk pooling capabilities of bank owners and bank managers, and the incentive of seeking high returns. To support our hypothesis, we apply an empirical study to the distance-to-default of different German banking sectors. This demonstrates that the risk-taking attitudes of banks are closely related to banks’ ownership structures. Consequent to our findings, we suggest legislative and regulatory authorities increase vigilance in terms of principal–agent problems within certain sectors of the banking industry. © 2013, © European Union.
引用
收藏
页码:518 / 540
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Incentive pay and bank risk-taking: Evidence from Austrian, German, and Swiss banks
    Efing, Matthias
    Hau, Harald
    Kampkoetter, Patrick
    Steinbrecher, Johannes
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 96 : S123 - S140
  • [42] Investment deposits, risk-taking and capital decisions in Islamic banks
    Hamza, Hichem
    Saadaoui, Zied
    STUDIES IN ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2013, 30 (03) : 244 - +
  • [43] Research on the Impact of Financing Liquidity on Risk-taking of Commercial Banks
    Bu, Yumeng
    2018 2ND AASRI INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS AND CONTROL (ISC 2018), 2019, 267
  • [44] The Impact of Competition on the Profitability and Risk-Taking of Commercial Banks in India
    Rastogi, Shailesh
    Kanoujiya, Jagjeevan
    Bhimavarapu, Venkata Mrudula
    Gautam, Rahul Singh
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN FINANCE ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2022, 9 (05): : 377 - 388
  • [45] Efficiency and Risk-Taking in Pre-Crisis Investment Banks
    Radic, Nemanja
    Fiordelisi, Franco
    Girardone, Claudia
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH, 2012, 41 (1-2) : 81 - 101
  • [46] The effects of regulation and supervision on the risk-taking behaviour of Islamic banks
    Asutay, Mehmet
    Ayturk, Yusuf
    Aksak, Ercument
    JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC ACCOUNTING AND BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2020, 11 (10) : 1953 - 1967
  • [47] Political institutions and foreign banks' risk-taking in emerging markets
    Wang, Rui
    Sui, Yubing
    JOURNAL OF MULTINATIONAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 51 : 45 - 60
  • [48] Research on the impact of financial technology on risk-taking of commercial banks
    Li, Chengyou
    Li, Yuxin
    Xu, Yun
    Sun, Guanglin
    RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2025, 76
  • [49] The relationship between competition and risk-taking behaviour of Indian banks
    Sarkar, Sanjukta
    Sensarma, Rudra
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMIC POLICY, 2016, 8 (01) : 95 - 119
  • [50] The Role of Capital Regulation and Risk-Taking by Banks in Monetary Policy
    Olszak, Malgorzata
    OECONOMIA COPERNICANA, 2014, 5 (01) : 7 - 26