What is the time course of working memory attentional refreshing?

被引:0
|
作者
Benoît Lemaire
Aurore Pageot
Gaën Plancher
Sophie Portrat
机构
[1] Univ. Grenoble Alpes,
[2] CNRS,undefined
[3] LPNC UMR 5105,undefined
[4] Univ. Lyon 2,undefined
[5] EMC,undefined
来源
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review | 2018年 / 25卷
关键词
Working memory; Computational modeling; Attentional refreshing;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
One way of maintaining information in working memory is through attentional refreshing, a process that was recently shown to be independent from verbal rehearsal. In the classical working memory complex span task, the usual assumption is that memoranda are refreshed in a cumulative fashion, starting from the first item, going in a forward order until the latest one, and cycling until there is no time to continue the process. However, there is no evidence that refreshing operates in that way. The present study proposes a computational modelling study, which constitutes a powerful method to investigate alternative hypotheses. Different refreshing schedules are investigated within computational implementation of the time-based resource sharing model. Their ability to fit three sets of behavioral data and to reproduce the major time-based resource sharing predictions were evaluated using standard model selection criteria. Besides an already published schedule in which the attentional focus is expanded, it appeared that one schedule, the least-activated-first, outperforms the classical cumulative one. The memory trace refreshed at a given time is the one that is the least activated in working memory at that time. These findings characterized the time course of attentional refreshing in working memory and specified the contribution of refreshing to primacy and recency effects. Moreover, in the light of various fields of cognitive psychology, we propose that such refreshing schedules can operate without a homunculus within a general framework including cognitive control and strategic considerations.
引用
收藏
页码:370 / 385
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The time course of attentional focusing
    Benso, F
    Turatto, M
    Mascetti, GG
    Umilta, C
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 10 (04): : 373 - 388
  • [42] Time-course of cortical networks involved in working memory
    Phan Luu
    Caggiano, Daniel M.
    Geyer, Alexandra
    Lewis, Jenn
    Cohn, Joseph
    Tucker, Don M.
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 8
  • [43] Neural systems and time course of proactive interference in working memory
    Du, Yingchun
    Zhang, John X.
    Xiao, Zhuangwei
    Wu, Renhua
    2007 ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-16, 2007, : 1136 - +
  • [44] REFRESHING MEMORY
    NEWARK, M
    SAMUELS, A
    CRIMINAL LAW REVIEW, 1978, (JUL): : 408 - 416
  • [45] Refreshing memory traces: thinking of an item improves retrieval from visual working memory
    Souza, Alessandra S.
    Rerko, Laura
    Oberauer, Klaus
    COMPETITIVE VISUAL PROCESSING ACROSS SPACE AND TIME: ATTENTION, MEMORY, AND PREDICTION, 2015, 1339 : 20 - 31
  • [46] Does Semantic Long-Term Memory Impact Refreshing in Verbal Working Memory?
    Camos, Valerie
    Mora, Gerome
    Oftinger, Anne-Laure
    Elsig, Stephanie Mariz
    Schneider, Philippe
    Vergauwe, Evie
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2019, 45 (09) : 1664 - 1682
  • [47] Pruning representations in a distributed model of working memory: a mechanism for refreshing and removal?
    Shepherdson, Peter
    Oberauer, Klaus
    ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 2018, 1424 (01) : 221 - 238
  • [48] A (further) test of spontaneous serial refreshing in verbal and spatial working memory
    Evie Vergauwe
    Naomi Langerock
    Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2023, 85 : 1600 - 1611
  • [49] Long-term semantic representations moderate the effect of attentional refreshing on episodic memory
    Loaiza, Vanessa M.
    Duperreault, Kayla A.
    Rhodes, Matthew G.
    McCabe, David P.
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2015, 22 (01) : 274 - 280
  • [50] Refreshing and removing items in working memory: Different approaches to equivalent processes?
    Lintz, Evan N.
    Johnson, Matthew R.
    COGNITION, 2021, 211