Estimation and uncertainty analysis of groundwater quality parameters in a coastal aquifer under seawater intrusion: a comparative study of deep learning and classic machine learning methods

被引:0
|
作者
Mehmet Taşan
Sevda Taşan
Yusuf Demir
机构
[1] Black Sea Agricultural Research Institute,Department of Soil and Water Resources
[2] Ondokuz Mayis University,Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Structures and Irrigation
关键词
Alaçam; Coastal aquifer; Chloride; Groundwater salinization; Irrigation water quality; Machine learning algorithms;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Excessive withdrawal of groundwater for agricultural irrigation can cause seawater intrusion into coastal aquifers. Such a case will in turn results in deterioration of irrigation water quality. Determination of irrigation water quality with traditional methods is a time-consuming and costly process. However, machine learning algorithms can be useful tools for modeling and estimating groundwater quality used for irrigation water purposes. In this study, TDS, PS, SAR, and Cl parameters of groundwater were estimated with models based on EC and pH variables. For this purpose, prediction performances of two different deep learning methods (convolutional neural network (CNN) and deep neural network (DNN)) and two different classical machine learning (Random Forest (RF) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)) methods were compared. In addition, predictive uncertainty of the models was determined by quantile regression (QR) analysis. Performance criteria and results of uncertainty analysis revealed that CNN (in testing phase, NSE = 0.95 for TDS, NSE = 0.96 for PS, NSE = 0.67 for SAR and NSE = 0.93 for CI) and DNN (in testing phase, NSE = 0.91 for TDS, NSE = 0.91 for PS, NSE = 0.57 for SAR and NSE = 0.94 for Cl) models had quite a close performance in estimation of TDS, PS, SAR, and Cl parameters and higher than the other two classical machine learning methods. As a result, the CNN model can be considered the best performing model in estimating all quality parameters due to the highest NSE and lowest RMSE values. In addition, the Taylor diagram showed that the values estimated using the CNN model had the highest correlation with the measured data. It was determined that the model with the lowest uncertainty based on the PICP statistics was DNN, followed by the CNN model. However, the CNN model has predicted outliers more accurately. Present findings proved that deep learning models could offer efficient tools for predicting irrigation water quality parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:2866 / 2890
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Intrusion Detection System Based on Machine and Deep Learning Models: A Comparative and Exhaustive Study
    Pandey, Hemlatha
    Karnavat, Tejal Lalitkumar
    Sandilya, Mandadapu Naga Sai
    Katiyar, Shashwat
    Rathore, Hemant
    HYBRID INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, HIS 2021, 2022, 420 : 407 - 418
  • [22] A Comparative Study of CIPN Symptom Estimation Methods Based on Machine Learning
    Hamanaka, Satoki
    Sasaki, Wataru
    Okoshi, Tadashi
    Nakazawa, Jin
    Yagasaki, Kaori
    Komatsu, Hiroko
    UBICOMP/ISWC '21 ADJUNCT: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 ACM INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON PERVASIVE AND UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING AND PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 ACM INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON WEARABLE COMPUTERS, 2021, : 117 - 120
  • [23] Comparative Analysis of Classical Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods for Fruit Image Recognition and Classification
    Salim, Nareen O. M.
    Mohammed, Ahmed Khorsheed
    TRAITEMENT DU SIGNAL, 2024, 41 (03) : 1331 - 1343
  • [24] Comparative Study on Deep Learning Methods for Apple Ripeness Estimation on Tree
    Hamza, Raja
    Chtourou, Mohamed
    INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS DESIGN AND APPLICATIONS, ISDA 2021, 2022, 418 : 1325 - 1340
  • [25] Deep learning-based surrogates for multi-objective optimization of the groundwater abstraction schemes to manage seawater intrusion into coastal aquifers
    Roy, Dilip Kumar
    Datta, Bithin
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2025, 377
  • [26] Predicting groundwater depth fluctuations using deep learning, extreme learning machine and Gaussian process: a comparative study
    Deepak Kumar
    Thendiyath Roshni
    Anshuman Singh
    Madan Kumar Jha
    Pijush Samui
    Earth Science Informatics, 2020, 13 : 1237 - 1250
  • [27] Predicting groundwater depth fluctuations using deep learning, extreme learning machine and Gaussian process: a comparative study
    Kumar, Deepak
    Roshni, Thendiyath
    Singh, Anshuman
    Jha, Madan Kumar
    Samui, Pijush
    EARTH SCIENCE INFORMATICS, 2020, 13 (04) : 1237 - 1250
  • [28] Machine and Deep Learning Based Comparative Analysis Using Hybrid Approaches for Intrusion Detection System
    Rashid, Azam
    Siddique, Muhammad Jawaid
    Ahmed, Shahid Munir
    2020 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCEMENTS IN COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCES (ICACS), 2020,
  • [29] Unsupervised machine and deep learning methods for structural damage detection: A comparative study
    Wang, Zilong
    Cha, Young-Jin
    ENGINEERING REPORTS, 2022,
  • [30] A comparative study of breast cancer tumor classification by classical machine learning methods and deep learning method
    Satish Yadavendra
    Machine Vision and Applications, 2020, 31