The newly developed three-dimensional (3D) and two-dimensional (2D) thyroid ultrasound are strongly correlated, but 2D overestimates thyroid volume in the presence of nodules

被引:0
|
作者
T. Rago
W. Bencivelli
M. Scutari
C. Di Cosmo
C. Rizzo
P. Berti
P. Miccoli
A. Pinchera
P. Vitti
机构
[1] University of Pisa,Department of Endocrinology
[2] University of Pisa,Department of Internal Medicine
[3] University of Pisa,Department of Surgery
[4] University of Pisa,Department of Chemical Engineering
来源
Journal of Endocrinological Investigation | 2006年 / 29卷
关键词
Thyroid ultrasonography; three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound; two-dimensional (2D); thyroid nodules;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The newly developed three-dimensional (3D) and two-dimensional (2D) thyroid ultrasound (US) were compared in assessing thyroid volume (TV) in 104 patients: 53 had an isolated thyroid nodule, 32 toxic diffuse goiter, 17 non-toxic multi-nodular goiter, 1 toxic multinodular goiter and 1 a toxic adenoma. A real-time Technos apparatus (Esaote SpA, Italy) with a 7,5 MHz linear transducer was used. The volume of thyroid lobes by 2D was calculated according to the ellipsoid formula. In the same session, TV by 3D US was calculated using a probe tracking system (in vivo ScanNT Esaote 3.4 MedCom. Darmasdt) and software to reconstruct 3D images, directly giving the lobe volume. There was a very good agreement between 2D and 3D, but in 94/208 lobes with nodular lesions 2D showed a 10% systematic overestimation compared to 3D, the percentage error being higher in lobes with lower volumes. A possible explanation for this result is the inadequacy of the ellipsoid formula in forecasting the correct lobe profile in the presence of nodules. This intrinsic defect of 2D US should be taken into account when evaluating TV in patients with nodular goiter.
引用
收藏
页码:423 / 426
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Linear Tunability of the Band Gap and Two-Dimensional (2D) to Three-Dimensional (3D) Isostructural Transition in WSe2 under high Pressure
    Shen, Pengfei
    Ma, Xin
    Guan, Zhou
    Li, Quanjun
    Zhang, Huafang
    Liu, Ran
    Liu, Bo
    Dong, Qing
    Cui, Tian
    Liu, Bingbing
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C, 2017, 121 (46): : 26019 - 26026
  • [32] WTe2 as a Two-Dimensional (2D) Metallic Contact for 2D Semiconductors
    McClellan, Connor J.
    Mleczko, Michal J.
    Smithe, Kirby K. H.
    Nishi, Yoshio
    Pop, Eric
    2016 74TH ANNUAL DEVICE RESEARCH CONFERENCE (DRC), 2016,
  • [33] Two-dimensional (2D) versus three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy for vaginal cuff closure by surgeons-in-training: a randomized controlled trial
    Mobolaji O. Ajao
    Christian R. Larsen
    Elmira Manoucheri
    Emily R. Goggins
    Maja T. Rask
    Mary K. B. Cox
    Avery Mushinski
    Xiangmei Gu
    Sarah L. Cohen
    Martin Rudnicki
    Jon I. Einarsson
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2020, 34 : 1237 - 1243
  • [34] Testicular volumetry using a calliper, two-dimensional (2D)-, and three-dimensional (3D) sonography to determine Daily Sperm Output (DSO) in the stallion
    Pricking, S.
    Spilker, K.
    Martinsson, G.
    Burger, D.
    Bollwein, H.
    Sieme, H.
    REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS, 2017, 52 : 41 - 41
  • [35] Three-Dimensional (3D) Versus Two-Dimensional (2D) Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: a Single-Surgeon Prospective Randomized Comparative Study
    Giuseppe Currò
    Giuseppe La Malfa
    Antonio Caizzone
    Valentina Rampulla
    Giuseppe Navarra
    Obesity Surgery, 2015, 25 : 2120 - 2124
  • [36] Three-dimensional (3D) system versus two-dimensional (2D) system for laparoscopic resection of adrenal tumors: a case-control study
    Rodriguez-Hermosa, Jose Ignacio
    Ranea, Alejandro
    Delisau, Olga
    Planellas-Gine, Pere
    Cornejo, Lidia
    Pujadas, Marcel
    Codony, Clara
    Girones, Jordi
    Codina-Cazador, Antoni
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2020, 405 (08) : 1163 - 1173
  • [37] Two-dimensional (2D) versus three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy for vaginal cuff closure by surgeons-in-training: a randomized controlled trial
    Ajao, Mobolaji O.
    Larsen, Christian R.
    Manoucheri, Elmira
    Goggins, Emily R.
    Rask, Maja T.
    Cox, Mary K. B.
    Mushinski, Avery
    Gu, Xiangmei
    Cohen, Sarah L.
    Rudnicki, Martin
    Einarsson, Jon, I
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (03): : 1237 - 1243
  • [38] Different Expression of Thyroid-Specific Proteins in Thyroid Cancer Cells between 2-Dimensional (2D) and 3-Dimensional (3D) Culture Environment
    Oh, Ji Min
    Gangadaran, Prakash
    Rajendran, Ramya Lakshmi
    Hong, Chae Moon
    Lee, Jaetae
    Ahn, Byeong-Cheol
    CELLS, 2022, 11 (22)
  • [39] Three-Dimensional (3D) Versus Two-Dimensional (2D) Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: a Single-Surgeon Prospective Randomized Comparative Study
    Curro, Giuseppe
    La Malfa, Giuseppe
    Caizzone, Antonio
    Rampulla, Valentina
    Navarra, Giuseppe
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2015, 25 (11) : 2120 - 2124
  • [40] Three-dimensional (3D) system versus two-dimensional (2D) system for laparoscopic resection of adrenal tumors: a case-control study
    José Ignacio Rodríguez-Hermosa
    Alejandro Ranea
    Olga Delisau
    Pere Planellas-Giné
    Lídia Cornejo
    Marcel Pujadas
    Clara Codony
    Jordi Gironès
    Antoni Codina-Cazador
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2020, 405 : 1163 - 1173