Biofumigation potential of brassicas

被引:0
|
作者
M. Sarwar
J.A. Kirkegaard
机构
[1] CSIRO,Division of Plant Industry
关键词
Brassica; disease; environment; glucosinolate; isothiocyanate;
D O I
10.1023/A:1004333230899
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Biofumigation refers to the suppression of soil-borne pests and pathogens by biocidal compounds released by Brassicaceous green manure and rotation crops when glucosinolates (GSLs) in their tissues are hydrolysed. We investigated the effect of environment and ontogeny on the GSL production, and thus biofumigation potential, of eight entries from five Brassica species. The environments included autumn and spring sown field plots (FA and FS) and potted plants grown under ambient conditions (PAM) or in a temperature controlled glasshouse at 20 °C/12 °C (PTC). GSL concentration was measured in the root and shoot tissue at buds-raised, flowering and maturity. Of particular interest was the suitability of the pot-grown plants for screening large numbers of brassicas for GSL production. The type of GSLs present in the tissues and their relative proportions remained relatively constant across environments and at different growth stages, with the exception of an increase in indolyl GSLs in the FS environment suspected of being induced by insect attack. Total GSL concentration generally declined from buds-raised to flowering in all environments, and was lowest at maturity. The exceptions were B. campestris, which had higher GSL concentration at flowering than at buds-raised, and the PTC environment in which most species also showed an increase at flowering. Despite GSL types and their proportions remaining relatively constant, the total GSL concentration in the root and shoot tissue of all entries varied significantly with environment (3–10-fold) and was generally ranked FS>PAM>FA>PTC. Interactions between species and environments meant that the ranking of the Brassica entries for total shoot and root GSL concentration changed with environment. However within three entries from B. napus, the ranking was consistent across the environments. The added effect of environment on phenological development and biomass production further influenced GSL production (the product of GSL concentration and biomass) on a ground area basis. The results suggest that glasshouse environments can be used to determine the types and proportions of GSLs present, and to rank entries within, but not between species for the total concentration in the tissues. However the influence of the environment on both GSL concentration and biomass production suggests that an accurate estimate of GSL production on a ground area basis to assess biofumigation potential will require measurement in the target environment.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 101
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Response of brassicas to sulphur for yield
    Singh, B
    Singh, J
    Kumar, A
    Yadav, YP
    Singh, S
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 1999, 69 (06): : 427 - 429
  • [42] CONSERVATION TILLAGE FOR FORAGE BRASSICAS
    JUNG, GA
    MCCLELLAN, WL
    BYERS, RA
    KOCHER, RE
    HOFFMAN, LD
    DONLEY, HJ
    JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 1983, 38 (03) : 227 - 230
  • [43] Biofumigation and nematode control in the Mediterranean region
    Bello, Antonio
    Lopez-Perez, Jose A.
    Garcia-Alvarez, Avelino
    Sanz, Rafael
    LaCasa, Alfredo
    PROCEEDING OF THE FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF NEMATOLOGY, 2004, 2 : 133 - 149
  • [44] Antagonism between biofumigation and biocontrol in the soil
    Riga, E.
    Henderson, D.
    Snyder, W.
    Ramirez, R.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2008, 98 (06) : S132 - S133
  • [45] VEGETABLE BRASSICAS AND RELATED CRUCIFERS
    Lebeda, Ales
    Dixon, Geoffrey R.
    Wells, Rachel
    PLANT PROTECTION SCIENCE, 2024,
  • [46] Profiling glucosinolates in vegetative and reproductive tissues of four Brassica species of the U-triangle for their biofumigation potential
    Bellostas, Natalia
    Sorensen, Jens C.
    Sorensen, Hilmer
    JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 2007, 87 (08) : 1586 - 1594
  • [47] Mustard Suppression of Cucurbits without Biofumigation
    Bjoerkman, Thomas
    Shail, Joseph W.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2010, 45 (08) : S76 - S76
  • [48] BIOFUMIGATION AS AN ALTERNATIVE METHOD OF CROP PROTECTION
    Piekarska, Anna
    Bartoszek, Agnieszka
    Namiesnik, Jacek
    ECOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY AND ENGINEERING S-CHEMIA I INZYNIERIA EKOLOGICZNA S, 2010, 17 (04): : 527 - 547
  • [49] Biocidal plant dried pellets for biofumigation
    Lazzeri, L
    Leoni, O
    Manici, LM
    INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2004, 20 (01) : 59 - 65
  • [50] Limits to the Biofortification of Leafy Brassicas with Zinc
    White, Philip J.
    Pongrac, Paula
    Sneddon, Claire C.
    Thompson, Jacqueline A.
    Wright, Gladys
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2018, 8 (03):