A computer-based laparoscopic skills assessment device differentiates experienced from novice laparoscopic surgeons

被引:0
|
作者
S.S. McNatt
C.D. Smith
机构
[1] Department of Surgery,
[2] Emory USSC Endosurgical Unit,undefined
[3] Emory University School of Medicine,undefined
[4] Room H-124B,undefined
[5] 1364 Clifton Road,undefined
[6] NE,undefined
[7] Atlanta,undefined
[8] GA,undefined
[9] 30322,undefined
[10] USA,undefined
来源
Surgical Endoscopy | 2001年 / 15卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The acquisition of laparoscopic skills is difficult to assess. Previously, through the use of a computer-based skills assessment device (SAD), we have shown that assessments of the time needed to perform a task and graded observations of task performance overestimate the speed at which laparoscopic skills can be acquired. The aim of this study was to test the ability of a laparoscopic SAD to differentiate novices from experienced laparoscopic surgeons and thereby further validate its use in surgical education. Methods: Using a laparoscopic simulator platform integrated with task simulation and data collection software (MIST VR), we tested both experienced and novice laparoscopists. Each group performed three tasks with a minimum of seven repetitions. The tasks consisted of target acquisition, target traversal, and target manipulation with diathermy. Within each task, time (T), errors (E), and economy of movement for each hand (EML, EMR) were assessed. Results were reported as mean ± SEM, and comparisons were made using an independent samples t-test. Results: For the target acquisition task, the expert group performed the task faster than the novice group (5.5 ± 0.24 vs 7.6 ± 0.40 sec, p <0.05); the experts also made fewer errors (0.5 ± 0.10 vs 0.8 ± 0.11 errors, p <0.05), and achieved both a better EML (1.8 ± 0.6 vs 2.3 ± 0.9, p <0.05) and a better EMR (2.0 ± 0.1 vs 2.9 ± 0.21, p <0.05). In the target traversal task, the experts made fewer errors than the novices (2.2 ± 0.25 vs 4.6 ± 0.38 errors, p <0.05). For the manipulation and diathermy tasks, the expert group completed the task faster (30.8 ± 1.5 vs 39 ± 1.5 sec, p <0.05), made fewer errors (5.3 ± 0.59 vs 8.1 ± 0.63 errors, p <0.05), and had a better EML (6.0 ± 0.37 vs 7.2 ± 0.45, p <0.05) and EMR (4.3 ± 0.23 vs 5.8 ± 0.36, p <0.05) than the novices. Conclusion: A laparoscopic skills assessment device can discern levels of laparoscopic manipulative skill. This type of device can be used in surgical training to make objective assessments of the acquisition of laparoscopic skills.
引用
收藏
页码:1085 / 1089
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] In vivo assessment of cervical movement in surgeons—results from open and laparoscopic procedures
    Niall P. Hardy
    Jennifer Mannion
    Roisin Johnson
    Garvin Greene
    Dermot J. Hehir
    Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -), 2021, 190 : 269 - 273
  • [42] Developmental Trajectory of Information-Processing Skills in Children: Computer-Based Assessment
    Williams, Jacqueline
    Crowe, Louise M.
    Dooley, Julian
    Collie, Alex
    Davis, Gavin
    McCrory, Paul
    Clausen, Helen
    Maddocks, David
    Anderson, Vicki
    APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY-CHILD, 2016, 5 (01) : 35 - 43
  • [43] Computer-based endoscopy simulation: Emerging roles in teaching and professional skills assessment
    Fitzgerald, Tamara N.
    Duffy, Andrew J.
    Bell, Robert L.
    Berman, Loren
    Longo, Walter E.
    Roberts, Kurt E.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2008, 65 (03) : 229 - 235
  • [44] Clinical outcomes of single incision laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis between well-experienced and novice surgeons
    Tei, Mitsuyoshi
    Suzuki, Yozo
    Ohtsuka, Masahisa
    Iwamoto, Kazuya
    Naito, Atsushi
    Imasato, Mitsunobu
    Mizushima, Tsunekazu
    Akamatsu, Hiroki
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2023, 7 (01): : 102 - 109
  • [45] Educational value of surgical videos on YouTube: quality assessment of laparoscopic appendectomy videos by senior surgeons vs. novice trainees
    Nicola de’Angelis
    Paschalis Gavriilidis
    Aleix Martínez-Pérez
    Pietro Genova
    Margherita Notarnicola
    Elisa Reitano
    Niccolò Petrucciani
    Solafah Abdalla
    Riccardo Memeo
    Francesco Brunetti
    Maria Clotilde Carra
    Salomone Di Saverio
    Valerio Celentano
    World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 14
  • [46] Educational value of surgical videos on YouTube: quality assessment of laparoscopic appendectomy videos by senior surgeons vs. novice trainees
    de'Angelis, Nicola
    Gavriilidis, Paschalis
    Martinez-Perez, Aleix
    Genova, Pietro
    Notarnicola, Margherita
    Reitano, Elisa
    Petrucciani, Niccolo
    Abdalla, Solafah
    Memeo, Riccardo
    Brunetti, Francesco
    Carra, Maria Clotilde
    Di Saverio, Salomone
    Celentano, Valerio
    WORLD JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2019, 14 (1)
  • [47] Erratum to: The effect of a performance-based intra-procedural checklist on a simulated emergency laparoscopic task in novice surgeons
    Michael El Boghdady
    Benjie Tang
    Afshin Alijani
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2017, 31 : 2705 - 2705
  • [48] Erratum to: The effect of a performance-based intra-procedural checklist on a simulated emergency laparoscopic task in novice surgeons
    Michael El Boghdady
    Benjie Tang
    Afshin Alijani
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2017, 31 : 3764 - 3764
  • [49] Construct validation of a novel hybrid virtual-reality simulator for training and assessing laparoscopic colectomy; results from the first course for experienced senior laparoscopic surgeons
    Neary, Paul C.
    Boyle, Emily
    Delaney, Conor P.
    Senagore, Anthony J.
    Keane, Frank B. V.
    Gallagher, Anthony G.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2008, 22 (10): : 2301 - 2309
  • [50] Construct validation of a novel hybrid virtual-reality simulator for training and assessing laparoscopic colectomy; results from the first course for experienced senior laparoscopic surgeons
    Paul C. Neary
    Emily Boyle
    Conor P. Delaney
    Anthony J. Senagore
    Frank B. V. Keane
    Anthony G. Gallagher
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2008, 22 : 2301 - 2309