A computer-based laparoscopic skills assessment device differentiates experienced from novice laparoscopic surgeons

被引:0
|
作者
S.S. McNatt
C.D. Smith
机构
[1] Department of Surgery,
[2] Emory USSC Endosurgical Unit,undefined
[3] Emory University School of Medicine,undefined
[4] Room H-124B,undefined
[5] 1364 Clifton Road,undefined
[6] NE,undefined
[7] Atlanta,undefined
[8] GA,undefined
[9] 30322,undefined
[10] USA,undefined
来源
Surgical Endoscopy | 2001年 / 15卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The acquisition of laparoscopic skills is difficult to assess. Previously, through the use of a computer-based skills assessment device (SAD), we have shown that assessments of the time needed to perform a task and graded observations of task performance overestimate the speed at which laparoscopic skills can be acquired. The aim of this study was to test the ability of a laparoscopic SAD to differentiate novices from experienced laparoscopic surgeons and thereby further validate its use in surgical education. Methods: Using a laparoscopic simulator platform integrated with task simulation and data collection software (MIST VR), we tested both experienced and novice laparoscopists. Each group performed three tasks with a minimum of seven repetitions. The tasks consisted of target acquisition, target traversal, and target manipulation with diathermy. Within each task, time (T), errors (E), and economy of movement for each hand (EML, EMR) were assessed. Results were reported as mean ± SEM, and comparisons were made using an independent samples t-test. Results: For the target acquisition task, the expert group performed the task faster than the novice group (5.5 ± 0.24 vs 7.6 ± 0.40 sec, p <0.05); the experts also made fewer errors (0.5 ± 0.10 vs 0.8 ± 0.11 errors, p <0.05), and achieved both a better EML (1.8 ± 0.6 vs 2.3 ± 0.9, p <0.05) and a better EMR (2.0 ± 0.1 vs 2.9 ± 0.21, p <0.05). In the target traversal task, the experts made fewer errors than the novices (2.2 ± 0.25 vs 4.6 ± 0.38 errors, p <0.05). For the manipulation and diathermy tasks, the expert group completed the task faster (30.8 ± 1.5 vs 39 ± 1.5 sec, p <0.05), made fewer errors (5.3 ± 0.59 vs 8.1 ± 0.63 errors, p <0.05), and had a better EML (6.0 ± 0.37 vs 7.2 ± 0.45, p <0.05) and EMR (4.3 ± 0.23 vs 5.8 ± 0.36, p <0.05) than the novices. Conclusion: A laparoscopic skills assessment device can discern levels of laparoscopic manipulative skill. This type of device can be used in surgical training to make objective assessments of the acquisition of laparoscopic skills.
引用
收藏
页码:1085 / 1089
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A computer-based laparoscopic skills assessment device differentiates experienced from novice laparoscopic surgeons
    McNatt, SS
    Smith, CD
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2001, 15 (10): : 1085 - 1089
  • [2] Psychomotor skills assessment in practicing surgeons experienced in performing advanced laparoscopic procedures
    Gallagher, AG
    Smith, CD
    Bowers, SP
    Seymour, NE
    Pearson, A
    McNatt, S
    Hananel, D
    Satava, RM
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2003, 197 (03) : 479 - 488
  • [3] Simulation-based deliberate practice improves performance in laparoscopic skills in novice surgeons
    Browne, G.
    O'Connor, D.
    McVeigh, T. P.
    O'Connor, P.
    Kerin, M. J.
    Byrne, D.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 184 : S158 - S158
  • [4] Comparison of Surgical Skills in Laparoscopic and Robotic Tasks Between Experienced Surgeons and Novices in Laparoscopic Surgery: An Experimental Study
    Kim, Hye Jin
    Choi, Gyu-Seog
    Park, Jun Seok
    Park, Soo Yeun
    ANNALS OF COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2014, 30 (02) : 71 - 76
  • [5] Three-dimensional imaging improves surgical skill performance in a laparoscopic test model for both experienced and novice laparoscopic surgeons
    Roy Mashiach
    Vadym Mezhybovsky
    Avinoam Nevler
    Mordechai Gutman
    Amitai Ziv
    Marat Khaikin
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2014, 28 : 3489 - 3493
  • [6] Three-dimensional imaging improves surgical skill performance in a laparoscopic test model for both experienced and novice laparoscopic surgeons
    Mashiach, Roy
    Mezhybovsky, Vadym
    Nevler, Avinoam
    Gutman, Mordechai
    Ziv, Amitai
    Khaikin, Marat
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2014, 28 (12): : 3489 - 3493
  • [7] Virtual reality training followed by box training improves the laparoscopic skills of novice surgeons
    Sumitani, Daisuke
    Egi, Hiroyuki
    Tokunaga, Masakazu
    Hattori, Minoru
    Yoshimitsu, Masanori
    Kawahara, Tomohiro
    Okajima, Masazumi
    Ohdan, Hideki
    MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 2013, 22 (03) : 150 - 156
  • [8] Objective ergonomic risk assessment of wrist and spine with motion analysis technique during simulated laparoscopic cholecystectomy in experienced and novice surgeons
    Dabholkar, Twinkle Yogesh
    Yardi, Sujata Sudhir
    Oak, Sanjay Narahari
    Ramchandani, Sneha
    JOURNAL OF MINIMAL ACCESS SURGERY, 2017, 13 (02) : 124 - 130
  • [9] Validity and Reliability of Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) in Novice Trainees Performing a Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
    Kramp, Kelvin H.
    van Det, Marc J.
    Hoff, Christiaan
    Lamme, Bas
    Veeger, Nic J. G. M.
    Pierie, Jean-Pierre E. N.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2015, 72 (02) : 351 - 358
  • [10] Experienced surgeons can do more than one thing at a time: effect of distraction on performance of a simple laparoscopic and cognitive task by experienced and novice surgeons
    K. E. Hsu
    F.-Y. Man
    R. A. Gizicki
    L. S. Feldman
    G. M. Fried
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2008, 22 : 196 - 201