Adenoma detection at colonoscopy by polypectomy in withdrawal only versus both insertion and withdrawal: a randomized controlled trial

被引:0
|
作者
Madhusudhan R. Sanaka
Mansour A. Parsi
Carol A. Burke
David Barnes
James Church
Maged Rizk
Nizar Zein
Rajesh Joseph
Prashanthi N. Thota
Rocio Lopez
Ravi P. Kiran
机构
[1] Cleveland Clinic,Departments of Gastroenterology, Desk Q3
[2] Cleveland Clinic,1
[3] Cleveland Clinic,Colorectal Surgery
来源
Surgical Endoscopy | 2015年 / 29卷
关键词
Colonoscopy; Adenoma detection rate; Adenomas; Colon polyps; Insertion time; Withdrawal time;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Colonic configuration during insertion phase (IP) and withdrawal phase (WP) is different and some polyps seen during IP are difficult to find during WP and vice versa. To determine if polypectomy performed during both IP and WP of colonoscopy (study arm) increases adenoma detection rate (ADR) compared to WP only (control arm). In this prospective randomized controlled trial, adults undergoing out-patient colonoscopy were enrolled. The primary outcome was mean number of adenomas detected per patient. Secondary outcomes were ADR, defined as the proportion of colonoscopies with at least one adenoma, polyp detection rates (PDR), number of patients classified as high-risk group (presence of ≥3 adenomas of any size, any adenoma ≥1 cm in size, or adenoma with villous component, or high grade dysplasia), procedural times, patients discomfort, and ease of procedure. Among 772 patients enrolled, 610 were included (329 in study arm and 281 in control arm). In both arms, mean number of adenomas detected per patient were similar, 0.78 ± 1.4 vs. 0.74 ± 1.5, P = 0.75. Also, ADR (39.2 vs. 38.1 %, P = 0.77) and PDR (57.1 and 54.1 %, P = 0.45) were similar. Mean insertion time was significantly higher in study arm (10.2 ± 5.8 vs. 9.3 ± 5.6 min, p = 0.046). Proportion of patients identified as high-risk group were significantly higher in study arm (18.8 vs. 11.7 %, P = 0.016). Conclusions: Polypectomy performed during both IP and WP compared to the WP only, did not improve ADR or mean number of adenomas detected per patient. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, #NCT01025960.
引用
收藏
页码:692 / 699
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Detection of colonic polyps according to insertion/withdrawal phases of colonoscopy
    Morini, Sergio
    Hassan, Cesare
    Zullo, Angelo
    Lorenzetti, Roberto
    de Matthaeis, Marina
    Stella, Francesca
    Campo, Salvatore M. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2009, 24 (05) : 527 - 530
  • [32] Total Underwater Colonoscopy versus Standard CO2 for Adenoma Detection: A Randomized Controlled Tandem Colonoscopy Trial
    Anderson, Joseph
    Kahi, Charles J.
    Garcia, Jonathan R.
    Sullivan, Andrew W.
    Rex, Douglas K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 113 : S274 - S274
  • [33] Adenoma detection with Endocuff colonoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy: a multicentre randomised controlled trial
    van Doorn, S. C.
    van der Vlugt, M.
    Depla, A. C. T. M.
    Wientjes, C. A.
    Mallant-Hent, R. C.
    Siersema, P. D.
    Tytgat, K. M. A. J.
    Tuynman, H.
    Kuiken, S. D.
    Houben, G. M. P.
    Stokkers, P. C. F.
    Moons, L. M. G.
    Bossuyt, P. M. M.
    Fockens, P.
    Mundt, M. W.
    Dekker, E.
    GUT, 2017, 66 (03) : 438 - 445
  • [34] A randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of prescribed patient position changes during colonoscope withdrawal on adenoma detection
    Ou, George
    Kim, Edward
    Lakzadeh, Pardis
    Tong, Jessica
    Enns, Robert
    Ramji, Alnoor
    Whittaker, Scott
    Ko, Hin Hin
    Bressler, Brian
    Halparin, Lawrence
    Lam, Eric
    Amar, Jack
    Telford, Jennifer
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2014, 80 (02) : 277 - +
  • [35] The Impact of Timed Colonoscopy Withdrawal on Adenoma Detection Rates at a Community Hospital
    Valencia, Diego
    Metwally, Mark
    Ciofoaia, Victor
    Gaudioso, Annie
    Hale, William
    Meighan, Dennis
    Gross, Seth
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 105 : S568 - S568
  • [36] Colonoscopy Withdrawal Time and Adenoma Detection Rate: a Japanese Multicenter Analysis
    Kawamura, Takuji
    Oda, Yasushi
    Kobayashi, Kiyonori
    Matsuda, Koji
    Tanaka, Kiyohito
    Kida, Mitsuhiro
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 81 (05) : AB291 - AB292
  • [37] Adenoma miss rates associated with a 3-minute versus 6-minute colonoscopy withdrawal time: a prospective, randomized trial
    Kumar, Sheila
    Thosani, Nirav
    Ladabaum, Uri
    Friedland, Shai
    Chen, Ann M.
    Kochar, Rajan
    Banerjee, Subhas
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 85 (06) : 1273 - 1280
  • [38] Acupuncture for alcohol withdrawal:: A randomized controlled trial
    Trümpler, F
    Oez, S
    Stähli, P
    Brenner, HD
    Jüni, P
    ALCOHOL AND ALCOHOLISM, 2003, 38 (04): : 369 - 375
  • [39] Adenoma detection with cap-assisted colonoscopy versus regular colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial
    de Wijkerslooth, Thomas R.
    Stoop, Esther M.
    Bossuyt, Patrick M.
    Mathus-Vliegen, Elisabeth M. H.
    Dees, Jan
    Tytgat, Kristien M. A. J.
    van Leerdam, Monique E.
    Fockens, Paul
    Kuipers, Ernst J.
    Dekker, Evelien
    GUT, 2012, 61 (10) : 1426 - 1434
  • [40] Association between cecal insertion to withdrawal time ratio and adenoma detection rate: the longer insertion time, the longer withdrawal time
    Lee, Jeonghun
    Park, Woo Kyung
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 36 : 82 - 82