Experimental maxillary sinus augmentation using a highly bioactive glass ceramic

被引:0
|
作者
Rodrigo Ricci Vivan
Carlos Eduardo Mecca
Claudia Cristina Biguetti
Ana Claudia Muniz Rennó
Roberta Okamoto
Bruno Cavalini Cavenago
Marco Húngaro Duarte
Mariza Akemi Matsumoto
机构
[1] University of São Paulo – FOB/USP,Department of Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru School of Dentistry
[2] Sagrado Coração University – USC,Oral Biology Master’s Program
[3] University of São Paulo – FOB/USP,Oral Biology Doctoral’s Program, Bauru School of Dentistry
[4] Federal University of Sao Paulo,Department of Bioscience
[5] São Paulo State University,Department of Basic Sciences, Araçatuba School of Dentistry
[6] FOA/UNESP,Oral Biology Doctoral’s Program
[7] Sagrado Coração University,undefined
[8] USC,undefined
[9] CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico),undefined
关键词
Bone Graft; Maxillary Sinus; Bioactive Glass; Foreign Body Reaction; Autogenous Bone Graft;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Physicochemical characteristics of a biomaterial directly influence its biological behavior and fate. However, anatomical and physiological particularities of the recipient site also seem to contribute with this process. The present study aimed to evaluate bone healing of maxillary sinus augmentation using a novel bioactive glass ceramic in comparison with a bovine hydroxyapatite. Bilateral sinus augmentation was performed in adult male rabbits, divided into 4 groups according to the biomaterial used: BO—particulate bovine HA Bio-Oss® (BO), BO+G—particulate bovine HA + particulate autogenous bone graft (G), BS—particulate glass ceramic (180–212 μm) Biosilicate® (BS), and BS+G—particulate glass ceramic + G. After 45 and 90 days, animals were euthanized and the specimens prepared to be analyzed under light and polarized microscopy, immunohistochemistry, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and micro-computed tomography (μCT). Results revealed different degradation pattern between both biomaterials, despite the association with bone graft. BS caused a more intense chronic inflammation with foreign body reaction, which led to a difficulty in bone formation. Besides this evidence, SEM and μCT confirmed direct contact between newly formed bone and biomaterial, along with osteopontin and osteocalcin immunolabeling. Bone matrix mineralization was late in BS group but became similar to BO at day 90. These results clearly indicate that further studies about Biosilicate® are necessary to identify the factors that resulted in an unfavorable healing response when used in maxillary sinus augmentation.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Histologic changes in the sinus membrane after maxillary sinus augmentation in goats
    Bravetti, P
    Membre, H
    Marchal, L
    Jankowski, R
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1998, 56 (10) : 1170 - 1176
  • [42] Clinical Study of Graft Materials Using Autogenous Teeth in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation
    Jeong, Kyung-In
    Kim, Su-Gwan
    Kim, Young-Kyun
    Oh, Ji-Su
    Jeong, Mi-Ae
    Park, Jin-Ju
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2011, 20 (06) : 471 - 475
  • [43] Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation Using Xenograft: Gene Expression and Histologic Analysis
    Suwanwela, Jaijam
    Puangchaipruk, Dollaya
    Wattanasirmkit, Kamolporn
    Kamolratanakul, Paksinee
    Jansisyanont, Pornchai
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2017, 32 (03) : 611 - 616
  • [44] Bioactive glass and glass-ceramic-coated hip endoprosthesis: Experimental study in rabbit
    Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
    J. MATER. SCI. MATER. MED., 1 (14-18):
  • [45] Successful Management of Apically Exposed Implants in the Maxillary Sinus and Associated Sinus Pathologies Via Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation
    Park, Won-Bae
    Park, Wonhee
    Han, Ji-Young
    Kang, Philip
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2022, 48 (06) : 491 - 499
  • [46] A Guide to Recognizing Maxillary Sinus Pathology and for Deciding on Further Preoperative Assessment Prior to Maxillary Sinus Augmentation
    Friedland, Bernard
    Metson, Ralph
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2014, 34 (06) : 807 - 815
  • [47] Bioactive Glass for Alveolar Ridge Augmentation
    Margonar, Rogerio
    Queiroz, Thallita P.
    Luvizuto, Eloa R.
    Marcantonio, Elcio
    Comelli Lia, Raphael Carlos
    Holzhausen, Marinela
    Marcantonio-Junior, Elcio
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 23 (03) : E220 - E222
  • [48] Titanium Granules for Augmentation of the Maxillary Sinus - A Multicenter Study
    Lyngstadaas, Stale Petter
    Verket, Anders
    Pinholt, Else Marie
    Mertens, Christian
    Haanaes, Hans Reidar
    Wall, Gert
    Wallstrom, Mats
    Rasmusson, Lars
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2015, 17 : E594 - E600
  • [49] Prevalence of Sinus Augmentation Associated With Maxillary Posterior Implants
    Seong, Wook-Jin
    Barczak, Michael
    Jung, Jae
    Basu, Saonli
    Olin, Paul S.
    Conrad, Heather J.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2013, 39 (06) : 680 - 688
  • [50] Effect of augmentation of the maxillary sinusfloor on sinus physiology.
    Timmenga, NM
    Raghoebar, GM
    Vissink, A
    von Weissenbruch, R
    Liem, RSB
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 : 511 - 511